Revelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 10575 posts, RR: 21 Reply 1, posted (5 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1545 times:
GCT64 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 1128 posts, RR: 1 Reply 4, posted (5 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1393 times:
Does this mean we will have incessant "MAG should be renamed London Airports Group" to replace the "BA is now London Airways" and "Why won't BA fly from MAN?" threads?
And I look forward to: "Why is MAG allowing LGW-XXX flights when they should be making them fly MAN-XXX?"
And, yes, before the hate mail from oop North starts, I am joking ...
I really don't care who owns / operates LGW so long as BAA doesn't have a monopoly.
Kaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 11999 posts, RR: 36 Reply 5, posted (5 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1371 times:
I'm sure they won't be the only ones interested; we're likely to see Schiphol, FRAPORT and a number of other airports expressing an interest in LGW. It will be very healthy for London to have two competing major international gateways; it should have happened years ago.
Of course, as an aircraft enthusiast, I'd be delighted to see MAG take over; it would be great if they can provide the same facilities at LGW as they do at MAN!
Sponsor Message: 
From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 291 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 10575 posts, 
From UK - England, joined Feb 2004, 8810 posts, 
From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 11999 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
