Revelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12450 posts, RR: 25
Reply 1, posted
Mon May 5 2008 05:33:06 UTC (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2338 times:
I'm interested too. Call the BBC!
Inspiration, move me brightly!
Babybus From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted
Mon May 5 2008 05:45:16 UTC (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2319 times:
I wouldn't mind buying it either, depends how much.
Something tells me MAN buying LGW isn't a good idea. Might be better if LGW is bought by an independant company.
We need more cut throat competition between the London airports not between north south airports.
BMIFlyer From UK - England, joined Feb 2004, 8810 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted
Mon May 5 2008 06:31:02 UTC (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2258 times:
Quoting Babybus ( Reply 2): Something tells me MAN buying LGW isn't a good idea. Might be better if LGW is bought by an independant company.
MAG is a very good company in respect of the way it manages, runs and invests in the airports that it owns.
I'm sure they would do a lot better with LGW thatn the shoddily run BAA has!
Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own
GCT64 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 1389 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted
Mon May 5 2008 08:07:21 UTC (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2186 times:
Does this mean we will have incessant "MAG should be renamed London Airports Group" to replace the "BA is now London Airways" and "Why won't
BA fly from MAN?" threads?
And I look forward to: "Why is MAG allowing LGW-XXX flights when they should be making them fly MAN-XXX?"
And, yes, before the hate mail from oop North starts, I am joking ...
I really don't care who owns / operates LGW so long as BAA doesn't have a monopoly.
Flown in: A30B,A306,A310,A319,A320,A321,A332,A333,A343,A346,BA11,BU31,B190, B461,B462,B463,(..50 types..),VC10,WESX
Kaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12432 posts, RR: 37
Reply 5, posted
Mon May 5 2008 08:24:45 UTC (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2164 times:
I'm sure they won't be the only ones interested; we're likely to see Schiphol, FRAPORT and a number of other airports expressing an interest in
LGW. It will be very healthy for London to have two competing major international gateways; it should have happened years ago.
Of course, as an aircraft enthusiast, I'd be delighted to see MAG take over; it would be great if they can provide the same facilities at LGW as they do at MAN!
Bennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7566 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted
Sat May 10 2008 03:45:18 UTC (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 1994 times:
I'm with Kaitak all the way.