Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is "Austrian" In Trouble?  
User currently offlineAviationbuff From India, joined Mar 2008, 1432 posts, RR: 3
Posted (8 years 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3412 times:

Austrian CEO rejects new Saudi investor's allegations


Austrian CEO Alfred Otsch has struck out at Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber’s threat to pull his new investment, labelling the move as incomprehensible and rejecting all allegations of deception.

Saudi investor Al Jaber is due to take 20% of Austrian but, through his lawyers, he is now threatening to withdraw from the agreement claiming the airline provided misleading information over its position.

Otsch says: “The exit that is now in the air and the reasons given for this are not comprehensible for us in any way. Also, I am personally deeply disappointed. Despite this development, we expect that Sheikh Al Jaber will comply with the contract.

“If this should not take place, we shall undertake appropriate steps in order to preserve our rights. I again emphatically reject the allegation of deception, it is completely unfounded.

“Constructing this as a reason for exist is astonishing, as the investor still intended to increase his commitment by a further 4.9%, taking advantage of the low share price, in the knowledge of the already disclosed results of the first quarter of 2008.”

Despite the brewing rift, Otsch insists that Austrian will stick by its ownership-neutral strategy. The airline will continue to focus on its core markets in central and eastern Europe and push forward with its Middle East growth plan.

Otsch says: “Even without the investment of Al Jaber, we will find ways in the future to sustainably occupy this market successfully.

“We also have the financial strength to do this, the lion’s shares of economic losses were eliminated last year, we have a good strategic positioning and capitalise on our competitive advantages. Due to the difficult industry situation, we will undertake measures to secure profitability.”

Would like to know from Austrian ANetters the impact on the airline on the above.

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAustrianZRH From Austria, joined Aug 2007, 1429 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3387 times:

Well, the main problem with OS is that everything is political. That goes as far as sometimes in the past, defeated candidates of presidential elections got some jobs on the board... Due to the ÖIAG (partly state-owned Austrian industry holding) owning the majority of OS shares, everything needs to be balanced - not on the bank account but concerning the equilibrium between social-democratic and conservative board members. All that leads to a massively overgrown administration and management who partly have no real qualification.

So, to your question,

Quoting Aviationbuff (Thread starter):
Is "Austrian" In Trouble?

yes, they are, but I can't believe the Austrian government will allow the airline to go down, even if they have to inject the taxpayer's money. However, I'd much prefer a qualified management not needing any government money...

It's all a pity, as I read many trip reports on OS's high quality on A.net. Unfortunately, I've never been able to fly them as I live in ZRH and have always lived closer to ZRH and MUC than to VIE. Definitely want to try them someday, though!

WARNING! The post above should be taken with a grain of salt! Furthermore, it may be slightly biased towards A.
User currently offlineAviationbuff From India, joined Mar 2008, 1432 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3043 times:

Austrian Airlines extends Jaber funds deadline


Austrian Airlines said it had extended to May 21 a deadline for investor Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa al Jaber to provide a bank guarantee for his plan to take a major stake.

The guarantee had been due by the end of Monday.

In a deal announced in March, the Saudi-Austrian investor was to take a 20 percent stake in the airline via a capital increase for about 150 million euros ($230 million) but the deal had run into trouble.

The statement appeared to open the way for further talks after the airline's main stakeholder, state holding company OeIAG, said on Monday night talks had broken up over "conditions that were impossible to fulfil."

Tuesday's statement from the airline still accused al Jaber of maliciously claiming to have been misled. It rejected the allegations.

Al Jaber threatened to pull out after the airline posted a first-quarter EBIT loss of 50.1 million euros in April, much worse than expected, sending the shares sliding.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
No Wonder DL Is In Trouble-Ron Allen's "contract" posted Wed Jul 27 2005 14:57:43 by 767Lover
Where In The World Is "The Spirit Of Delta" 772LR? posted Thu Mar 13 2008 10:55:39 by WindowSeat
Why Is "Bandit" In DEN? posted Fri Jan 18 2008 20:08:19 by Transpac787
How Is "Delta Connection" Doing In New England? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 00:27:32 by Cs03
What Is "flat Bulkhead" In 737-900ER posted Mon Aug 7 2006 01:14:41 by Lahaina
What Is "su" & "se" In The E-170? posted Sat Dec 24 2005 22:23:48 by NY-JFK-LGA
"How Safe Is It To Fly In Africa?" (BBC) posted Wed Dec 14 2005 00:51:46 by Varig767
Why Is The Letter "I" Omitted In Seat No's? posted Tue Apr 19 2005 14:05:12 by Bluepoole
What Is The Point Of "check-in?" posted Thu Aug 26 2004 21:31:34 by Mats
Qantas Proposal For B777 Is Still "Up In The Air" posted Thu Aug 12 2004 19:13:58 by Kalakaua