Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Go To Top | Help | Search 
139 Orders Of Upgrade-Package For 777 Classics  
User currently offlineAviationbuff From India, joined Mar 2008, 309 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 11266 times:

Boeing secures over 130 orders for upgrade package for older-model 777s

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...grade-package-for-older-model.html

Quote:
A quarter of operators of older Boeing 777s have purchased a new performance improvement package that should boost the widebody airliner's fuel efficiency by 1%.

Boeing has officially launched the package for 777-200/200ER/300 models (dubbed "Classics") with orders for 139 aircraft from "at least seven" carriers, including launch customers Air New Zealand, Continental Airlines and Delta Air Lines. Boeing also confirms that Austrian Airlines, El Al and KLM have ordered upgrades for their 777 Classics.

Entry into service is targeted for early 2009 after Boeing completes a certification programme.


[Edited 2008-05-13 03:38:55]

37 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineSAN787 From United States, joined Jun 2007, 489 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 11259 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

If it saves the airline $300,000 annually, I wonder how much the upgrade costs initially...


those who don't get carried away should be.
User currently offlineCHRISBA777ER From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 4254 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 11230 times:

I wonder if this includes raked wingtip retrofits?

Anyone know?


"REJOICE! Bush is (bad) history! - GO OBAMA! Make the World love the USA again!"
User currently offlineCricket From India, joined Aug 2005, 2055 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (3 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 10959 times:

139 orders from 7 carriers - NZ, CO, LY, DL, KL, OS don't operate 139 777's between them... who is the seventh? AF or SQ?


Have you flown the A380 yet? I have. TWICE!
User currently offlineRamzi From Lebanon, joined Oct 2006, 211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (3 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 10869 times:



Quoting Cricket (Reply 3):
who is the seventh?

EK?


Yes.
User currently offlineStitch From United States, joined Jul 2005, 12103 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (3 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 10822 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

GE also offers their own PiP for the earlier GE90 engines found on these planes.

User currently offlineCricket From India, joined Aug 2005, 2055 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (3 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 10812 times:



Quoting Stitch (Reply 5):
GE also offers their own PiP for the earlier GE90 engines found on these planes.

Did GE ever power any -300 model? I don't think EK, SQ, KE, TG or CX have GE's on their -300's.


Have you flown the A380 yet? I have. TWICE!
User currently offlineRscaife1682 From United States, joined Feb 2008, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 10778 times:

It just seems weird to me to here 777 classics  Smile


RYAN

User currently offlineStitch From United States, joined Jul 2005, 12103 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (3 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 10627 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Cricket (Reply 6):
Did GE ever power any -300 model?

No. The bulk were Rolls-Royce with a handful of Pratt's.

Of course, GE has sold about 11 times as many GE90-115Bs on the -300ER program, so I expect they don't feel too bad. Big grin

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From United States, joined Feb 2001, 18128 posts, RR: 76
Reply 9, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 10243 times:



Quoting CHRISBA777ER (Reply 2):
I wonder if this includes raked wingtip retrofits?

Doubtful, as APB has twice tried (and thankfully, thusfar failed) to attract a customer commitment for 777 blended winglets.

Quoting Cricket (Reply 6):
Did GE ever power any -300 model?

just the -300ER

Quoting Rscaife1682 (Reply 7):
It just seems weird to me to here 777 classics

...indeed. Might even sound weird to "hear" it too.


Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
User currently offlineKrisYYZ From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 999 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 10021 times:

Most of KL 's B777 are only one to three years old.
I was under the impression that Boeing continuously upgrades their designs as they are manufactured so every aircraft that rolls of the assembly line is up-to-date.

KrisYYZ

User currently offlineLemurs From United States, joined Mar 2005, 1406 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 9235 times:



Quoting Stitch (Reply 5):
GE also offers their own PiP for the earlier GE90 engines found on these planes

CO has already rolled the GE PiP improvements across their whole 772ER fleet, so this is additional benefit on top of it.

(From what I can tell, the GE90 PiP involves bringing all older GE90-90s, 84s, etc...up to GE90-94Bs, and then some improvements that went out about a year after the 94B itself was certified.)


There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those that don't.
User currently offlineRheinbote From Germany, joined May 2006, 1185 posts, RR: 19
Reply 12, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 9088 times:



Quoting CHRISBA777ER (Reply 2):
I wonder if this includes raked wingtip retrofits?

Anyone know?

The answers are no and yes.

User currently offlineSRT75 From United States, joined Jul 2005, 196 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 9089 times:



Quoting Cricket (Reply 3):
who is the seventh? AF or SQ?

Any chance UA will update their 777 fleet? If any T7s deserve the label "classic," it's UAs!

User currently offlineTdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 3156 posts, RR: 24
Reply 14, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 8993 times:



Quoting KrisYYZ (Reply 10):
I was under the impression that Boeing continuously upgrades their designs as they are manufactured so every aircraft that rolls of the assembly line is up-to-date.

That's true. Any time any of the OEM's releases a service bulletin to correct something in the fleet, they usually roll the correction into production as well. There are also some upgrades that some in at production that aren't retrofitable. Both kinds of upgrades happen throughout the life of a program.

Tom.

User currently offlineFlyDreamliner From United States, joined Jan 2006, 2103 posts, RR: 10
Reply 15, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 7659 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting SRT75 (Reply 13):


Quoting Cricket (Reply 3):
who is the seventh? AF or SQ?

Any chance UA will update their 777 fleet? If any T7s deserve the label "classic," it's UAs!

I would hope so... they have so many of them. Maybe they could get the MTOW numbers on their 772ER's taken up too (no mechanical changes needed)... no good reason for them not to.

Some of their 777-200s are old, but some are fairly new as well. In terms of the shape they are in, they are far from the least modern and pleasant 777-200s flying around.


"Let the world change you, and you can change the world"
User currently offlineGlom From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 1980 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 7573 times:

Upgrade package? What have I missed? Is this the next big thing from Boeing? What other new aircraft have come out lately?


£37 Aberdeen to Birmingham, £38 Birmingham to Watford => trains are rubbish!
User currently offlineNighthawk From United Kingdom (Scotland), joined Sep 2001, 3695 posts, RR: 28
Reply 17, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 7153 times:

Ah yes - Boeing 777 SP1. Ive been waiting for this to come out for a while now, I think ill download it tonight! lol!


"Thats why you need people like me in the secret service" Random Drunk. Manchester. 01/08
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From United States, joined Feb 2001, 18128 posts, RR: 76
Reply 18, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 6906 times:



Quoting Lemurs (Reply 11):
From what I can tell, the GE90 PiP involves bringing all older GE90-90s, 84s, etc...up to GE90-94Bs

No it doesn't... it "just" involves installing the 3D-Aero and equivalent support infrastructure. The airline is still free to choose the thrust output, and for a while, CO continued to op its PiPed engines at 90K before bringing them up.


Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
User currently offlineSiren From United States, joined Aug 2006, 233 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6396 times:



Quoting FlyDreamliner (Reply 15):
Maybe they could get the MTOW numbers on their 772ER's taken up too (no mechanical changes needed)... no good reason for them not to.

Airport landing fees charge based on the rated weight of a given aircraft. I'm guessing UA is saving money by going this route.

User currently offlineGkyip From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 155 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6288 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I guess CX could be a big potential customer for these upgrades. 17 777 classics and a load of 77Ws on order.

Gary


The strength of the turbulence is directly proportional to the temperature of your coffee
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From United States, joined Feb 2001, 18128 posts, RR: 76
Reply 21, posted (3 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6288 times:



Quoting FlyDreamliner (Reply 15):
Maybe they could get the MTOW numbers on their 772ER's taken up too (no mechanical changes needed)...

No, they cannot

Quoting FlyDreamliner (Reply 15):
no good reason for them not to.

Actually, there's a very good reason:
a PW4090-powered 777 cannot op with higher than a 648K.lb MTOW

Quoting Siren (Reply 19):
I'm guessing UA is saving money by going this route.

No.