Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Takeoff Speeds.  
User currently offlineThom@s From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 11953 posts, RR: 46
Posted (13 years 6 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 4056 times:

Hi.

What are the takeoff speeds of the following aircrafts?
1. SAAB-340
2. Boeing 737-500
3. MD-82
4. Embraer EMB 120 Brasillia
5. BAe Jetstream 31

Taken into concideration that all aircrafts are fully loaded.

Thom@s


"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFP_v2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 6 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3981 times:

Around 140-150 knots for the 737 with 5 deg flaps.

User currently offlineRaggi From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 998 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (13 years 6 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3967 times:

Thom@s, I think you`do wise in posting your question in the tech-ops forum...
I cant`t help you more than that....
ta det roligt i kvell.....

raggi



Stick & Rudder
User currently offlineCritter_592 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 279 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 6 months 2 days ago) and read 3957 times:

MD-82 is about the same as the 737. To get the exact Vr speed, you'd have to ask a pilot and they'll figure it by weather. Roughly between 135-145 knots.

User currently offlineAAR90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3471 posts, RR: 47
Reply 4, posted (13 years 6 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3942 times:

>MD-82 is about the same as the 737. To get the exact Vr speed,
>you'd have to ask a pilot and they'll figure it by weather.
>Roughly between 135-145 knots.

MD90 speeds are very similar if not the same. Range is anywhere from 119 - 149 kias.



*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
User currently offlineIFF/7000 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 6 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3914 times:

Dear Thomas,
It's a little more complicated;
The 3 most importand speeds on TO are v1, vr, v2.
1. V1: The highest speed during TO at which the crew has a choice between continuing TO or abort TO. So if you decide to stop when passed v1 you will not be able to stop the ac at the end of the RWY.
2. vr: The speed at which the pilot rotates in order to reach v2 at an altitude of 35 feet at latest after an engine failure.
3. v2: Is the speed that the ac has to maintain during initial climb after an engine failure.Minimum v2 is equal to 1.2x the stalling speed. For fly by wire ac 1.13x vs.

A lot of parameters are needed to compute these speeds. EX. weight, configuration, winds, RWY condition (wet,iced,snow), airport characteristics (elevation , temp,...),brake energy,tire speed,etc

Also when you have very long RWY's we use improved climb speeds, this means that because of the length of the RWY you can take a higher v1, vr, v2.
On A321 I've seen rotation speeds from 120Kts up to 165Kts.

I hope this is what you asked for
See you


User currently offlineAmbasaid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 6 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3908 times:

IFF/7000

I thought that V1 had evolved into an action speed rather than a decision speed. Therefore you dont have a choice, once you reach V1 you are going.

I think that you will also find that the 1.13Vs value applies to aircraft certified after a certain date rather than fly by wire versus non-FBW, this change also incorporates the use of a 1g factor in the stall.


User currently offlineIFF/7000 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 6 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3906 times:

Ambasaid,

I tried to keep it simple but you're right.

V1 : One common and misleading way to think of v1 is to say "v1 is the decision speed." This is misleading because v1 is not the point to begin making operational Go/No Go decision. The decision must have been made by the time the airplane reaches v1 or the pilot will not have initiated the RTO procedure at v1. Therefore, by definition, the airplane will be traveling at a speed higher than v1 when stopping action is initiated, and if the airplane is at a field length limit weight, an overrun is virtually assured. ( 1 sec is the min time that will exist between the engine failure and the first pilot stopping action).Boeing's Pilot guide to TO safety.

For a conventional ac, the ref. stall speed, VSmin, is based on a load factor that is less than 1g. This gives a stall speed that is lower than the stall speed at 1g. All operating speeds are expressed as functions of this speed (ex. vref = 1.3 VSmin). Because ac of the A320 family have a low-speed protection feature that the flight crew cannot override, the airworthiness authorities have reconsidered the def. of stall speed for these ac. All the operating speeds must be ref. to a speed that can be demonstrated by flight test. This speed is designated VS1g. Airworthiness authorities have agreed that a factor of 0.94 represents the relationship between VS1g A320 and VSmin for conventional ac.
RESULT A320
v2 = 1.2x0.94 VS1g = 1.13 VS1g
Vref = 1.3x0.94 VS1g = 1.23 VS 1g
These speeds are identical to those that the conventional 94% rule would have defined for these ac. The A320 family have exactly the same maneuver margin that a conventional ac would have at its ref speeds. (Airbus FCOM 3.04.10)


User currently offlineIFF/7000 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 6 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3899 times:

The only other fly by wire ac I know is the F16. But there you fly AOA instead of Vref. All the pilot need to do is set the chosen AOA on the HUD and fly down to the RWY.13° AOA gives good tail clearance, 16° AOA gives a very slow approach but a good chance to scrape the ventrals.

User currently offlineThom@s From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 11953 posts, RR: 46
Reply 9, posted (13 years 6 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3890 times:

Thanks for answering. I realise now that this was kind of a bad question.  Smile

Thom@s



"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"
User currently offlineIFF/7000 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 6 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3889 times:

Let me just add this. United Airlines Perfo:

Airbus certified the A320 with Optimized V-Speeds. It literally throws Balanced Field out the window. Basically, SFO Engineering has identified a ' typical' runway for each flap setting, and then optimize V1 to take advantage of the full length of that 'typical' runway.
Some airlines have made these calculations for Boeing also.


User currently offlineAmbasaid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (13 years 6 months 17 hours ago) and read 3863 times:

Thanks IFF,

The VS1g applies to non-FBW aircraft as well and is used by Boeing.

The reason that i heard for its introduction was to level the playing field between the FBW and non-FBW aircraft, rather than having a test pilot declare the "stall", they got a bit more scientific about it and therefore removed the human error.

Airbus has always used Optimized V-speeds, we have them in the A300. Boeing also have the option, but not many operators use it.


User currently offlineIFF/7000 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (13 years 6 months 13 hours ago) and read 3851 times:

Thanks Ambasaid
Did'nt know about vs1g for Boeing


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Romanian Plane Hits Horse On Takeoff posted Wed Dec 6 2006 17:17:42 by BALandorLivery
SkyValue USA Just Two Weeks Away From GYY Takeoff posted Thu Nov 30 2006 02:10:30 by KarlB737
IAH Ops - 777 To The EU + Low Level Takeoff posted Mon Nov 27 2006 04:51:38 by Ikramerica
Bizarre Takeoff Scenario...UAL From JFK posted Mon Nov 27 2006 02:14:00 by Dmanmtl
A380 Crosswind Testing Video (Landing & Takeoff) posted Wed Nov 15 2006 20:02:09 by Leelaw
MH 772 Lost Engine Parts At Takeoff @ ARN posted Fri Nov 3 2006 15:02:34 by Bjornstrom
Is There A Fee At Airports To Land And Takeoff posted Thu Nov 2 2006 01:04:55 by Fll2993
Aircraft Going In Circles Shortly After Takeoff posted Thu Oct 26 2006 20:18:49 by Quickmover
Cleared For Takeoff, Irish Aviation Thread 17 posted Sun Oct 22 2006 14:22:38 by Kaitak
Small Plane Explodes After Takeoff posted Thu Oct 19 2006 12:02:34 by BoeingOnFinal
Beautiful 727 Takeoff Video - Neat Perspective! posted Wed Sep 22 2010 14:26:23 by EA772LR
Passengers Attempt To Halt BA 777 Takeoff... posted Wed Sep 1 2010 20:48:02 by JoeCanuck
9W2032 At A Aborted Takeoff Incident At BOM. posted Fri Aug 27 2010 10:02:17 by jayeshrulz
Finnair Flight Struck Runway Lights In Takeoff posted Sun Dec 5 2010 06:58:18 by FFlyer
Inside Cockpit Video Of Niki Lauda On Takeoff posted Wed Dec 1 2010 19:14:00 by Nudlaug
QF 744 Engine Trouble After SIN Takeoff posted Fri Nov 5 2010 07:17:22 by BA174
Alrosa Tu-154 Ready To Takeoff From Izhma Airport posted Mon Nov 1 2010 07:31:50 by Severnaya
Strange Takeoff Proceedings At LAX posted Wed Oct 27 2010 14:00:41 by DLATL777
Beautiful 727 Takeoff Video - Neat Perspective! posted Wed Sep 22 2010 14:26:23 by EA772LR
Passengers Attempt To Halt BA 777 Takeoff... posted Wed Sep 1 2010 20:48:02 by JoeCanuck
9W2032 At A Aborted Takeoff Incident At BOM. posted Fri Aug 27 2010 10:02:17 by jayeshrulz