Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing 717.. Prolly Not In Midex Fleet  
User currently offlineBoeing757fan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 10 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1486 times:

Well... As Midwest Express Airlines is getting ready to choose between Boeing 717 and Airbus equipment, an incident with a TWA 717 at MKE might mean a new customer for Airbus Industries. It has been reported to me that a TWA 717 on take off out of MKE bound for STL. on Monday had a MAJOR PROBLEM and BARELY made it back to MKE. The THRUST REVERSERS opened on TAKEOFF! MidEx is very interested in this as you can imagine. What a blow for Boeing... Especially in the backyard of an airline that was strongly considering the aircraft. I know Airbus has had problems with the A320 family, and I am sure if it was an Airbus that had a major problem at MKE like that, MidEx would be looking towards the 717. This in my opinion is a bad break for Boeing. That impression might be the one that turns them away. I love the 717, and am not bashing it, I just think this happened at the wrong place at the wrong time and you can almost guarantee youll see MidEx colors on some Airbus int he near future. I may be wrong. This has been kept from the press in MKE, so if you havent heard about it, this might be why.


14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBlatantEcho From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1922 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (13 years 10 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1410 times:

Just curious what your source is.

The 717 would be a snap choice for them if it was assured it would grow into the 713. Because that is not a sure bet, the 318 has the growth potential that they are looking for.

BlatantEcho



They're not handing trophies out today
User currently offlineBoeing757fan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 10 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1383 times:

an airline worker at BAX out of MKE told me. He got the scoop.



User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8913 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (13 years 10 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1369 times:

I would think they would still go 717, as I feel it is better suited for their ops compared to an A318/A319.

Jeff


User currently offlineKALB From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 573 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 10 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1371 times:

And I don't think an airline is going to make a judgement based on one adverse event, even if it did occur in their back yard. The economics of the 717 are very good, so don't count it out.

User currently offlineCactusA319 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2918 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (13 years 10 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1359 times:


Don't jump to conclusions.

First an investigation will have to be conducted to see what made the thrust reversers deploy on that plane. If it is found to have been a flaw on that airplane, then an inspection will probably be made on all 717's to see if they have a similar problem that could compromise the aircraft's safety. My guess is that this is just an isolated even that MidEx is not going to jump on the Airbus bandwagon because of it. At least not until there is an explanation as to what happened. So for now nothing's guaranteed.



User currently offlineBoeing757fan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 10 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1346 times:

Cactus, thanks for the constructive comments. I figured out most of that myself. I was just stating that 1st impression is the important one. I dont think theyll base it alone on this, but, it might have an effect.


User currently offlineBlatantEcho From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1922 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (13 years 10 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1329 times:

Thanks for the info 757fan, I think it is just one more piece of the crazy puzzle that will lead to a big order and boost for either the 717 or the A320 family.

cheers,
BlatantEcho



They're not handing trophies out today
User currently offlineKing767 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 10 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1320 times:

Please, this will have no effect on a 717 order. Small incidents like this do not turn away orders.
-Tom


User currently offlineFalcon Flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1332 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (13 years 10 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1303 times:

767 customers weren't detered when a Lauda -300 was lost over Thailand with an airborne TR deployment. Southwest wasn't detered with the well publicized 737 rudder issue. Isolated incidents do not make or break orders.


My definition of cool ? Not trying so hard to be cool.
User currently offlineRepublic From Canada, joined Dec 2012, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 10 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1274 times:

Hi,

When is Midwest Express expected to announce their fleet decision?

Rgds,
Joe


User currently offlineDC-9CAPT From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (13 years 10 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1243 times:

You are reading entirely too much into an incident. In early 1994, a MIDEX -930 blew a reverser and lost an engine at V1 departing out of Stapleton. 3 minutes later the aircraft was able to land safely (albeit veering off the runway). During the subsequent 3 years, MIDEX dramatically increased its fleet size with numerous DC-930s--so an incident such as the one you are reporting will not have any effect.

Before I left the company last month, there was a huge rumor that Hoeksema had gone out and inked a deal for the 717. They were just waiting for the best time to make the announcement.

However, the issue has come up about the long term viability of the 717 and its stretch variant. While the 717 is the perfect replacement for the 10s/30s, without a replacement for the MD80s, the company could be left holding the bag. Expensive lessons were learned with the Skyway fiasco over the 428, and now they are looking to bring in the Jungle Jet.

A 320 was brought in last month to the MIDEX showroom lot with the 2*3 configuration. A focus group of frequent fliers was given a grip and grin/dog and pony session to find out how they liked the dreaded middle seat. That middle seat is going to be a risk, believe it or not, but the company will only fill the seat once they book above 80% and will fold down into a desk--which is a pretty good deal, if you ask me. The middle seat didn't turn off people like you might think.

The 318/319/320 could be the answer for long term growth. A lot of Jetways will have to be re-done as they won't reach right now. Once the announcement is made, the new planes will show up in 2003 if it's the airbus and sooner if the 717.

Interestingly, there has also been a lot of talk on the 717/MD80 being around. Before I left, MIDEX was supposedly going to purchase full motion sims and become an outsource for maintenance and training on the -9/md-80 much like DL has done with the L1011. And there could be some 717s showing up on the market (on the cheap) if TWA/AA goes through.

At any rate, it will be interesting to see what the decision is next month. Based on what my old friends are telling me, the Airbus has the inside track.


User currently offlineBoeing757fan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (13 years 10 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1211 times:

Well, you can downplay a reverser engagement shortly after takeoff if you want. If it was mechanical, I sure hope they figure out what caused it.



User currently offlineHlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (13 years 10 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1193 times:

Whose to say that MidEx isn't going to get a 737-600 or 700?

User currently offlineAeroGlobeAir7 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 586 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (13 years 10 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1190 times:

I don't really mind which aircraft they choose either way. I would benefit from it if they chose 717 more though, because I'm DYING to get a 717 here at MCI. If Midwest Express bought 717s they would certainly be coming to MCI since we are a secondary hub for them. Although I wouldn't mind getting some Airbus shots finally  Smile. So either way it benefits me! Although I would have to say my favorite of the two is the 717!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing 717 To Stay In Production! posted Wed Dec 12 2001 01:50:25 by Boeing in pdx
AirTran 717 & 737 In Boeing's 7E7 Colors posted Sun Jan 9 2005 23:53:35 by 717-200
Why Not A Big 767 Fleet In Am? posted Thu Sep 16 2004 02:08:01 by RCS763av
CO Is First W/ Boeing Electronic Flight Bag In US posted Fri May 4 2007 01:37:09 by RoseFlyer
Boeing's McNerney: Doesn't Exult In Airbus Trouble posted Thu May 3 2007 13:59:41 by VC10DC10
Coventry Airport Not In OAG Guides? posted Fri Apr 20 2007 13:27:47 by Kaitak
Hydraulics Problems In A320 Fleet? posted Thu Mar 8 2007 17:14:21 by Pygmalion
Delta Not In Talks With Northwest posted Wed Jan 24 2007 15:30:28 by D L X
A340F In DHL Fleet 10 Or 20 Years From Now? posted Tue Dec 5 2006 20:37:10 by 747400sp
Mayrhuber: LH "Not In A Hurry" To Decide On 748I posted Tue Nov 14 2006 08:55:38 by Leelaw