Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
British Air Says No To A380, To Phase Out 747?  
User currently offlineSm92 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 131 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3241 times:

Is it true? Anyonw have more info? on this article?

Defeat for Airbus jumbo jet

British Airways endorses Boeing view that smaller airliners are the future

Thursday, February 22, 2001

By JAMES WALLACE
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER

In what amounts to an important endorsement of The Boeing Co.'s
commercial market outlook and strategy, British Airways has decided it is not
interested in the Airbus A380 superjumbo.

An executive with the airline said yesterday that its studies over the past
several months concluded the 555-passenger jet does not make economic
sense, at least for the British Airways fleet.

"There are very few routes that suit large aircraft and we believe markets will
continue to fragment," Dick Wyatt, head of fleet planning for British Airways,
said in a speech to aircraft finance bankers in Geneva.

That's the same argument Boeing has been making in defending why it decided
not to develop its own all-new superjumbo to compete with the A380.

"This has got to represent a huge moral victory for Boeing," said Peter Jacobs,
a financial analyst who closely follows Boeing for Ragen MacKenzie.

"I'm sure there is some high-fiveing going on over at Boeing's commercial
headquarters."

Even though Airbus has officially launched the development of the A380 with
60 firm orders from some very important blue-chip airlines, including
Singapore and Qantas, the announcement that British Airways will not join in
the rush to buy the A380 is an important development, Jacobs said.

"This represents an endorsement of Boeing's market outlook in the face of
what has been a lot of fanfare and publicity over the recent Airbus order wins
for the A380," he said.

Boeing has long argued that in an era of deregulation and open-sky
agreements between countries, market fragmentation over the next 20 years
means airlines will need more planes the size of the 777 or smaller -- not the
A380 or even a bigger 747.

As routes fragment, airlines are flying their passengers directly to cities
previously served from large hub airports. Typically, the world's biggest
jetliner, Boeing's 747, carried passengers to these hub airports, where they
changed to smaller planes to fly to the city of their choice. Now, those
passengers can bypass the big hub airports.

This is known in the industry as point-to-point service.

As a result of this fragmentation, Boeing believes that even though there is a
market for the 555-passenger A380, it is too limited to justify the jet's
development cost. Airbus, which has said the A380 will cost $12 billion to
build, believes the market for its plane is substantially bigger than Boeing has
forecast.

In his speech at the aircraft finance conference, Wyatt said "point-to-point
frequency is what the customer wants, particularly business customers."

His comments indicated British Airways agrees more with Boeing about the
size of the market for a superjumbo.

"We don't believe there will be a market for second-hand sale of A380s,"
Wyatt was quoted by Bloomberg News as saying in his speech.

"It's going to be a very small market, very limited market. It's not a plane you
can buy and then say 'Oops, we shouldn't have done that, let's sell them.'
We'd be stuck with them."

British Airways announced a couple of years ago that it would gradually phase
out its fleet of 747s in favor of the 777.

"If we could have a dozen less 747s than we currently have and a dozen more
777s, we'd like to," Wyatt told several hundred aircraft finance bankers at the
conference. "That's the base line we ought to be at."

Boeing does plan to introduce new models of its 747 to counter the A380
threat.

Known as the 747X, these derivatives would cost about $4 billion to develop.

But Boeing has yet to land any orders for the 747X. Given the 60 firm orders
that Airbus already has for the A380, questions have been raised by aviation
experts whether Boeing made the right decision in not building an all-new
superjumbo.

"The key for Boeing is (to) land some orders for the 747X sometime this
year," Jacobs, the industry analyst, said.

Boeing has been shopping both passenger and freighter versions of the 747X
to potential customers, and program executives have said they could develop
the freighter version first since that is where most of the early customer interest
has been.

Korean Air Lines may order as many as 16 of the 747X freighters, according
to the latest issue of the respected trade magazine Flight International. The
magazine reported the airline is in advanced talks with Boeing on the deal,
which would include about $200 million in financing from Boeing.

Boeing declined comment on the report.

The company has said before that it is talking to Lufthansa, Atlas Air and other
cargo carriers about the 747X freighter.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWatewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (13 years 8 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3207 times:

Wow. KE thinking of 16 747X freighters? They're already one of the biggest cargo airlines in the world.

User currently offlineFlying lsd From Belgium, joined Feb 2001, 291 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 8 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3199 times:

THe future ,i agree ,is point-to-point service .

But point-to-point service between cities like LHR-JFK,
LHR-LAX,JFK-HKG etc will maybe need somme A380 for BA!



They prefer operate multiple frequencies a day such as
8 times a dayto New-York but don't forget the number of slot at LHR is restricted ...then they need maybe in 7 or 8 years , 8 A380 to New-york daily...

Neversay never and don't forget Virgin where A380 will be the new Flagship of the fleet.

THe 747 'll lose is status of the biggest airliner and that is maybe very important in the commercial war between the different company.


User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5351 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (13 years 8 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3170 times:

BA won't phase out all its 747's, just the -200's for now to replace 71 it could take years although they have expressed interest in the 773 though to operate probably to some US cities so they may sell 10-12 744's.
Off the original question is there any plan for BA to return to AKL with their own aircraft, I know they codeshare with QF to AKL from LAX, SYD, MEL and BNE but it would be awsome to see them flying their own aircraft here again.

Scott


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8018 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (13 years 8 months 1 day ago) and read 3149 times:

BA is definitely NOT completely phasing out 747 operations. They may phase out the 747-200 and sell a small number of 747-400's, but BA will still keep about 40 744's, mostly because of the heavy investment in the upgraded First Class and the installation of Club World and World Traveller class seating on the 744's.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Atlas/Polar To Phase Out 747 Classic posted Thu May 25 2006 15:42:00 by Viasa
FAA Says No Room To Grow At Newark posted Sat Jun 26 2004 06:37:04 by STT757
Boeing Says No Head To Head Between 747X And A3XX posted Fri Oct 13 2000 23:46:21 by Delta777-XXX
Accc Says NO To Qantas/Air New Zealand posted Tue Sep 9 2003 02:41:07 by AJ
Gulf Air And Garuda To Phase Out Aircraft posted Mon Oct 15 2001 16:50:56 by Airmale
Iran Says "No" To ECO-Air posted Fri Feb 23 2001 04:29:33 by Brissie_lions
Fabric Out, But Air NZ Uniform Colours To Stay posted Sun Oct 22 2006 22:00:14 by NZ560
FAA Says No To JAT For U.S And Canada Flights. posted Tue Apr 25 2006 16:59:16 by Wolsingerjet
Californian Woman To Build House Out Of 747 posted Thu Apr 20 2006 16:26:57 by Cloudyapple
LX Timetable Changes Due To Erj-145 Phase Out posted Sun Dec 11 2005 12:57:03 by RJ100