Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ONE BIG Problem With The 757-300 IN The U.S  
User currently offlineATA L1011 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1379 posts, RR: 6
Posted (13 years 5 months 1 week ago) and read 2553 times:

I THINK ONE OF THE BIG PROBLEMS WITH THE 757-300 IS THAT IT IS TOO LONG FOR ALOT OF ITS INTENDED MISSIONS GATE SPACE. THE EXTRA LENGTH IS POSING A PROBLEM AT MANY AIRPORTS WITH 757 AND SMALLER AIRCRAFT ALLOCATED GATE SPACE. IT WILL STICK OUT INTO THE TAXI WAY IN MANY CASES, I BELIEVE THAT IS ONE OF THE PROBLEM WE ARE RUNNING ACROSS DOES ANYONE ELSE AGREE?


Treat others as you expect to be treated!
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 7993 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week ago) and read 2489 times:

No.

The reason is simple: it the gates can handle the DC-10, L1011, and 777-200 series, it can handle the 757-300 easily.

Fortunately, most of the major airports in the USA are already 753 compatible.  Smile


User currently offline456 From Netherlands, joined Feb 2001, 328 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week ago) and read 2466 times:

Is the new upcoming a340-600 not the longest airplane there will be?

User currently offlineJuul From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week ago) and read 2435 times:

Don't think it'll be a problem, many aircraft are longer than 753!

Oh, ATA L1011: stop writing in capatals man, it's REALLY annoying.

Welcome to the forums.


User currently offlineSEVEN_FIFTY7 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 957 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (13 years 5 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2415 times:

I agree, Juul. My ears are still ringing from reading that post.




User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8062 posts, RR: 54
Reply 5, posted (13 years 5 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2411 times:

The 757-300 can fit at gates, but if it's a widebody gate it'll cost the airline more to park there, and that cost has to be recouped by less pax than on a 747 or DC10.

One of the perceived problems when the 777 was introduced was the same as above, namely that it's wingspan is the same as the 747 and would need the widest gates, but with less pax this would cost the airlines more per pax. Don't know if it turned out to be a problem in practice though.



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineLewis From Greece, joined Jul 1999, 3623 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (13 years 5 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2410 times:

Although i do not live in USA:

The fact is that the 753 is the longest single-aisle, not compareable with longer two-aisled aircraft. Maybe in some cases the aircraft wont fit parking spaces provided for regional jets or other single-aisle planes in domestic terminals. Might be wrong, don't know exactly.
Another thing that came up is that fast loading and unloading(passengers) will not be a reality as passengers will have to cross all the aisle from the far end to reach the only jetway(most airports have only one per gate) attached to a front door. Such problems were found by lufthansa during evaluation use.


User currently offlineKiwi dave From New Zealand, joined Aug 2000, 895 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (13 years 5 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2402 times:

You could say the same thing about the Boeing 777-300 and when they enter service the A340-500/600 and the longer range 777's.

User currently offline777gk From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1641 posts, RR: 18
Reply 8, posted (13 years 5 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2384 times:

The 757-300 can use the same gates at the Boeing 767-300, so with the widespread use of that type, it shouldn't be that much of a problem. The 753, at least at EWR, will always use the 2L door for boarding at most gates, but the taxiway problem shouldn't be that big of an issue due to the angle of most of the 757 gates, especially at EWR.

User currently offlineNwa747-400 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1337 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (13 years 5 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2364 times:

I think the biggest problem will not be fitting at the gate.
Rather, it will be the loading and unloading process of passengers that will take forever. The 757-200 is already pretty slow and adding all those pax and still only one door will be horrible.

Maybe in the NW case at DTW some of the gates are going to be equipped with 2 jetways in the new terminal and they might plug a 757-300 into one of those. Otherwise...yuck boarding and deplaning will take forever.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why The Secrecy With The 757-300 Tour? posted Wed Feb 9 2000 02:51:05 by Brick
NW 757-300 In BIL posted Sat Oct 7 2006 00:11:22 by GQfluffy
ATA 757-300 In BOS Tonight/Tomorrow Morning posted Sun Apr 24 2005 03:10:09 by Jjbiv
Why NWA 757-300 In SGF Today? posted Sun Mar 9 2003 05:49:32 by Big777jet
Northwest 757-300 In Honolulu posted Tue Mar 26 2002 07:54:51 by T prop
First 757-300 In Fao posted Sat May 8 1999 21:13:50 by Mirage
If The 757-300 Were Offered Earlier... posted Mon Sep 11 2006 01:02:57 by 1337Delta764
Has El Al Ever Operated The 757-300? posted Thu Sep 7 2006 14:16:13 by LY777
What's The Big Deal With Jet Blue posted Fri Mar 17 2006 04:21:49 by 9252fly
Why Did The 757-300 Fail? posted Thu Jan 5 2006 23:32:34 by 1337Delta764