Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A340-600s To Cathay  
User currently offlineMt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6886 posts, RR: 6
Posted (15 years 3 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2396 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thursday March 1 11:51 AM ET
Cathay To Add Airbus Jets

HONG KONG (AP) - Cathay Pacific Airways said Thursday it will add seven Airbus Industrie jets to its fleet, and noted it would have the capability to compete with U.S. rivals on long-haul routes into New York.

Cathay said it will lease three Airbus A340-600s for delivery in 2002-2003, while leasing three A340-300s and buying one A330-300 for delivery this year.

Cathay said in a statement that the A340-600s could fly long-haul nonstop services such as Hong Kong-Chicago and Hong Kong-New York.

Cathay now flies to New York via Vancouver but faces increased competition over the next few weeks as two U.S. carriers, Continental Airlines and United Airlines, launch nonstop services to New York.

Cathay has not said whether it will offer similar flights, but its chairman, James Hughes-Hallett, called the carrier ``a pioneer of ultra long-range flights.''

Step into my office, baby
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 13267 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (15 years 3 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2234 times:

Great news, although the A340-600 deal had been expected for some time. This is a trickle which I'm sure will ultimately become a flow. Cathay could well choose, in due course, to order the -500, in which case it would become the only airline to operate all four 340 models (remember they had four A340-200s back in '94/95, before the -300s joined the fleet).

Anyway, there is a thread on PPRuNET running on this; there is (as far as I can see) a slight disagreement, in that the PPRuNER states that there are 4 A340s coming. I'll have another look. The 3 A340s being leased from Boeing are to replace 3 ex Air China 340s, the departure of which is long awaited. They had no PTVs and were generally substandard, relative to the rest of the fleet. The "new" aircraft are, of course, ex SIA.

User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 13267 posts, RR: 34
Reply 2, posted (15 years 3 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2216 times:

Looking at the other report, I'd go with this one; i.e. it is an A330-300. Either way great news for CX.

By my reckoning, the fleet by the end of 02 should look like this (Airbus only):

2 A340-600 (+ one due in 03)

15 A340-300E

23 (!) A330-300.

I wonder if this makes CX the largest A330 operator. Can't think of any larger operator, not even TG/KE?

There's an airline on the move!

As to nonstops, I had heard that CX was looking at a nonstop to JFK; although no competitor should be ignored, I'd imagine CO is seen as a greater threat than UA (well, which would you choose?). It was rumoured that CX would keep the 744 one stop, but operate nonstop with a 340 as well . . .

User currently offlineGerardo From Spain, joined May 2000, 3481 posts, RR: 27
Reply 3, posted (15 years 3 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2203 times:

This would indeed make CX the biggest A330 operator, although I don't know, how EK's and KE's fleet will develop until then.


dominguez(dash)online(dot)ch ... Pushing the limits of my equipment
User currently offlineRed Panda From Hong Kong, joined Jun 2000, 1521 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (15 years 3 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2190 times:

Great news! As CX ordered A346, it's not very likely that they will order 772/773LR in the near future. Tho I still can't rule out this possibility since CX is now operating both 773/773 and A330/340. But just one question, would A346 be able to fly from HKG to JFK, EWR, YYZ or ORD w/o stop in both direction and in all seasons? I thought CX would buy A345 instead of A346 since AC is buying A345 for its pacific service as well. Furthermore A345 has more range.

r panda

User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (15 years 3 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2171 times:

CX should sell off those CFM56 powered A340-300s in favor of new powerful RR Trent powered A340-500s.

User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1896 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (15 years 3 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2159 times:

More powerful, but also much heavier! You don't want to carry those dead weight on shorter routes. The A343 and 345 are intended for different markets.

User currently offlineCathay pacific From Australia, joined May 2000, 1864 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (15 years 3 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2132 times:

can't wait to see those A346 in CX color......also they have ordered couple of Learjet45 for pilot training....it would be interesting to them in CX color too.....  Smile

cathay pacific, now you're really flying
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8361 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (15 years 3 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2107 times:

It'll be VERY interesting to see if CX assigns the A340-600's to the HKG-JFK non-stop run.

I think it can be done, but CX may have to order a higher-weight version that can carry enough fuel to fly HKG-JFK non-stop with the standard load of the A346.

User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (15 years 3 months 20 hours ago) and read 2053 times:

Does anyone know if CFM International is working on a higher thrust version (more than 34,000lbs), of the CFM56-5C engine for the A340-300E?

User currently offlineCX flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6811 posts, RR: 55
Reply 10, posted (15 years 3 months 19 hours ago) and read 2035 times:

Yes, it is good to see CX buy more aircraft. The company have said that they are seeing how CO's HKG-NY service goes before we launch our own. At the moment, if we fly, it would be with the A340, which would be weight restricted, and not all that desireable for us to do. This is why we are seeing how it all goes before we launch our own. The current YVR-JFK 744 would continue, as the loading is very good on that short sector. I have been told that only CX and AA fly YVR-JFK. Perhaps some of our Canadian members could confirm this?

User currently offlineAp305 From India, joined Jan 2000, 903 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (15 years 3 months 18 hours ago) and read 2026 times:

The a340-600 has a range of 13900kms in it's 365tmtow guise.It was reprted recently that this was further increased(by 4t?).This would take the range above the 298t 777-200er that Co is using on the jfk-hkg route.Cx would easily be able to fly hkg-jfk nonstop once the big bus is in servive with them.


User currently offlineRindt From Germany, joined May 2000, 930 posts, RR: 11
Reply 12, posted (15 years 3 months 16 hours ago) and read 2006 times:

During the summer, AC, AA, and CX will all fly YVR-JFK-YVR flights.
AC will use an A319/320, AA will use a B737-800, and of course a 744 with CX!
I do hope the CX 744 one-stop continues, as CX is the cheapest way to fly to JFK (from YVR)!


What other people think of you is none of your business!
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4555 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (15 years 3 months 14 hours ago) and read 1988 times:

Although I am not an A340, it is nice to see CX ordering some aircraft and taking the next step. I too wonder where the 777-200ER lays in their plans after the news release a while back about CX picking up some MAS birds. Quite interesting to hear a potential A380 operator talking about fragmenting a route.

In other news, it will be interesting to see how CO's 777-200ERs will perform on the EWR-HKG run. Just another form of fragmentation. Personally I would like to see CX try them out for a while.

"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineMagyar From Hungary, joined Feb 2000, 599 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (15 years 3 months 13 hours ago) and read 1977 times:

>Although I am not an A340, it is nice to see

Well, you would be the first airplane to write E-mails.
Airbus would be very proud of you and surely involve
your abilities in the comparision with the 777.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4555 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (15 years 3 months 7 hours ago) and read 1942 times:

Thanks for catching my mistake. What I meant to say was that I am not an A340 fan. Personally I would like to be a 747-400 though!

"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CX A340-600s To AKL posted Mon Jun 9 2003 23:55:12 by B-HXB
EK Shelves Plans To Convert A340-600s posted Mon Oct 16 2006 22:09:20 by Remcor
LHs A340-600s: Where Will They Fly To? posted Sun Mar 30 2003 11:35:01 by StarFlyer
Virgin To Delay A340-600s? posted Wed Dec 5 2001 10:12:28 by Ceilidh
Swissair To Delay Or Cancel Orders For A340-600s posted Sun Jul 1 2001 22:24:21 by TR
Cathay's New RFP A340-600s And A3XXs. posted Fri Nov 3 2000 17:00:35 by CX747
Will DJ Pick Up Cancel EK A340-600s posted Fri Nov 3 2006 12:26:38 by Australia1
How Are LHs A340-600s? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 17:59:45 by Windshear
Virgin A340-600 To Feature In New Bond Movie posted Thu Jun 15 2006 16:48:49 by Angelairways
Kudos To Cathay Pacific posted Wed May 17 2006 09:20:34 by Globalflyer