Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The 757-300 And The 767-400  
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8060 posts, RR: 54
Posted (14 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2295 times:

I know that these are old aircraft designs rejigged (and therefore significantly cheaper than a new design), but the 767-400 has only had 54 orders and the 757-300 has only had 17. This is absolutely disastrous for Boeing, I can't see how they can make any money at all from that. In fact I can't even see the 757-300 production line staying open for much longer, especially if they are counting on European charter airlines, who are all buying Airbus A330s and A320/21s as fast as they can. There may yet be an order from Britannia who are still big Boeing fans (recently leased a couple of A320s and sent them promptly back). But Monarch, LTU, Airtours and Leisure Int'l are not looking to Seattle, especially not to an old design that has been stretched to within an inch of it's life.

Anyway, does anyone here have higher hopes than I for these latest derivatives?


fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTP343 From Brazil, joined May 1999, 312 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (14 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2240 times:

Hello Cedarjet!

What about Lufthansa? I heard some time that they were looking to the 764 mainly for services between California and Germany (I think it would be a very very very stupid decision, since they don't have either a single B767/777, and, on contrary, they have many A340 in operation and in order. And anyway, what could the B764 do that a A330 couldn't? But, I'm not LH chairman...). but I don't know if it's true or just another rumour.

I think that both planes will face difficulties on sales process: the B757-300 because it's not a flexible plane, since it's mainly concepted to charter opertations; the B767-400 because the difference between it and a B777-200 Market A is minimum, and the B777 takes the advantages of being more modern and having a modern family existant and in perspective (772ER, 773, 77Xs), in oposition to the 767 family that seems to disappear in a near future.

Regards,

TP343, São Paulo, Brazil.


User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4453 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (14 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2229 times:

The genius behind these designs is that if orders don't role in the production line doesn't have to stop. Don't worry about these aircraft they will be just fine. It took the 757-200 a few years to get going also.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2221 times:

Wow. I can't believe your maturity and intellegence, or better said, lack thereof.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What's The Point Of The 757-300 And 767-400? posted Sun May 30 1999 00:26:01 by Cedarjet
The Boeing 767-400 posted Mon Jun 19 2006 00:14:33 by DID747
Where Does The Boeing 767-400 Go From Here? posted Mon Sep 9 2002 03:23:20 by BizJets
Northwest And The 757-300 posted Sat Feb 23 2002 00:52:45 by AmericanF100
Lufthansa And The 757-300 posted Wed Apr 4 2001 15:01:48 by GodBless
The New 767-400 posted Thu Nov 16 2000 18:41:05 by AT
Flying The New 767-400 posted Mon Jun 5 2000 20:48:13 by Stretch 8
The New 767-400 posted Sat Mar 18 2000 05:12:07 by Bruce
The New 767-400 posted Sat Mar 18 2000 05:07:39 by Bruce
Southwest And The 757-300. posted Sun Aug 22 1999 16:35:59 by CX747