Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Will All Of UAL's B 747s Go One Day?  
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Posted (13 years 5 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1517 times:

Hi fookies!

This may be discussed in the past. And I understand that the B 777s play a more and more important role for UAL.

The B 747-400s are also very important to UAL. And I do not expect them to go anytime soon.

However, they eventually have to retire. There are a few options for the replacement of the B 747-400s which include: B 777-300ER. B 747-400LR, B 747X or B 747X Stretch.

Will ALL of UAL's B 747s leave eventually? And no B 747s for UAL? I hope not. They need the capacity of a B 747-400 some how for some routes.

What do you guys think?  Smile

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (13 years 5 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1458 times:

Could be...they are really looking at the 777-300ER.

User currently offlineLuckySevens From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 5 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1441 times:

I think they should call Airbus and get a whole buncha A380s for 747-400 prices while they can. It just makes sense.
Now, if Airbus were to actually bid out what the A380 cost to produce, then they should go 777-300ER and get 3x as many as they had -400s and just up the frequencies.


User currently offlineSJC>SFO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 5 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1414 times:

I was under the impression that the capacity of the 777-300 was pretty close to that of a 744... why would they need 3 times as many planes?

User currently offlineKonaB777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 5 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1398 times:

With no successor to the 747-400 (no, the 747-400LR doesn't count, I'm talking about a totally new plane) in the forseeable future (schematics don't count), eventually, if things stay the way they seem to be going, one day United may not have any more 747s. If things keep going the way they are going, when the time comes, if UA still wants a huge airplane, they may have to buy A380s, as that may be the only plane on the market for this group.

User currently offlineAA-SAN From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 5 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1373 times:

Come on guys... do you really think that UA is going to be flying 747s forever??? I give them 30 more years at max, and then, who knows what options airlines will have to replace these 747-400 "classics"?

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 7993 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (13 years 5 months 1 day ago) and read 1357 times:

By the time UA finally start to phase out their 747-400 fleet, I think UA could either be buying the A380-800 or the proposed Boeing Blended Wing Body (BWB) airliner--this will be after 2013 or so.

And they will need such a big plane, especially for the very busy international trunk routes.


User currently offlineILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (13 years 5 months 1 day ago) and read 1348 times:

Let me ask everyone a question...

Have you noticed a trend that most other carriers are switching to the 777 over the 747 for their long hauls? Delta, American, and Continental has. British Airways will be trading 12 744s for 773ERs. What does that tell you?
It tells you that airlines are cutting capacity...not adding it! But they are operating more flights at any given day...which actually adds capacity. UA is starting to do that on their routes as we speak. The only reason that the 747 is still at United is because it has 100 more seats than the 777, but its operating costs are a lot higher, than a 777. Believe me, UA will dump the 747 for the 777. The A380 is too big for the routes served by United. The only few that could use an A380 are SFO-NRT/HFK, SFO-LHR, and JFK-NRT. NOt many huh? The skies are not that full, and with new technology, planes can fly higher, faster and farther...which is the case of the 777. The 777 is the future of avaition, and it will always have a big and a welcome home at United.


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 7993 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (13 years 5 months 21 hours ago) and read 1328 times:

While it is true that for this decade UA will be better off buying more 777-200ER's and start buying the 777-300ER, they ARE going to need something larger than a 747-400 once those planes reach their retirement age after 2013.

Remember, the number of passengers continues to grow on international flights, and airport landing slot capacity is definitely NOT increasing at the majority of Australasian airports unless massive amounts of money to expand airport capacity is spent NOW. Even now, the 747-400's UA flies on routes to NRT, SEL, HKG, PEK, and PVG are running at capacity, and UA's trans-Atlantic flights to LHR are also running at capacity. Flying more frequencies is NOT going to work in the long run because of the landing slot limitation issue.

Henceforth, while UA's 777 fleet will work wonders for long flights from smaller population centers to Asia and Europe, for flights from JFK, ORD, DEN, LAX and SFO, there will be a need for a larger plane, like it or not. UA could fill this need with the Airbus A380-800, or wait for Boeing to develop the Blended Wing Body (BWB) flying wing capable of seating 800+ passengers on a three-class configuration.


User currently offlineDeltawolf From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 37 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (13 years 5 months 21 hours ago) and read 1323 times:

777s have a defect but are being fixed the prob. is that there isnt enought oxagen and people faint its air that = to 8000 ft. (that im used to)

User currently offlineTim From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 705 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (13 years 5 months 21 hours ago) and read 1312 times:

UAL need 747's theres no doubt about it.

For example on the LAX-Australia route.
In 5 years QF will be flying brand spanking new Airbus A380's on the route. UAL need 744's or bigger on this route to compete.

Tim


User currently offlineILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (13 years 5 months 21 hours ago) and read 1308 times:

RayChuang,

I think that the A380 would be way to big. There is a better chance of the 74XS before that plane.


User currently offlineAio86 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 928 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (13 years 5 months 20 hours ago) and read 1305 times:

I was talking to a United A320 pilot around Christmas/Hannukah time 2000. I asked him if he thought UA would buy the 380. He said, "When the Airbus salesman/woman calls up United and asks if they want some, United will say, 'no we don't want any, but we'll take 15'" To put it simply, United will need to buy them to keep up and keep its name as the largest carrier in the world. Of course he told me this before the whole sit in the wings idea came about. But he thought that United will have them some day. However, that is just one pilot's opinion.

User currently offlineDeltaSFO From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 2488 posts, RR: 22
Reply 13, posted (13 years 5 months 19 hours ago) and read 1294 times:

Please.... what the hell kind of question is this. Will all of United's 737s go one day? Will all the 757s go one day? The 767s? How about the mighty Triple Sevens?

Of course they will all go one day. What, did you think United will still be flying 747s in 2060? How many DC-8s does UA still have in its fleet? How many L-1011s will Delta have after 31 July 01? How many DC-10s does American have?

DeltaSFO



It's a new day. Every moment matters. Now, more than ever.
User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (13 years 5 months 19 hours ago) and read 1281 times:

What you all don't seem to realize is that Boeing has introduced a viable 744 replacement, the 747X (not stretch). The 747X (probably the 745) holds about 430 passengers, and has a range of 8900nm. This, along with the 772ER/LR, and 773ER is what UAL needs. I doubt that they need the capacity of the A380.

User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Reply 15, posted (13 years 5 months 18 hours ago) and read 1270 times:

That's wouldn't happen. The future of UAL will be B 747-400s, B 747-400LRs, B 777-200ER as well as B 777-300ER.

Some of the routes do require the capacity of a B 747-400. And they will not be leaving anytime soon.

It will always be B 747 AND B 777. Not OR.


User currently offlineKonaB777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (13 years 5 months 18 hours ago) and read 1267 times:

If the 747X is a viable 747-400 replacement, how come no one has ordered it yet?

User currently offlineILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
Reply 17, posted (13 years 5 months 18 hours ago) and read 1267 times:

United Ailrine...why did you even bother to post such a silly topic if you already knew the answer to the question? Are you some kind of super genius, or something like that? I find it funny how you post a question, then answer it like you the know the actuall answer. If you know United's future plans, please let me know, as I'm very very interested in what they may be.  Wink/being sarcastic  Insane

Stretch out and Fly!
U N I T E D


User currently offlineKangar From Ireland, joined Feb 2000, 395 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (13 years 5 months 15 hours ago) and read 1245 times:

"The future of UAL will be B 747-400s, B 747-400LRs, B 777-200ER as well as B 777-300ER. " United Airline, your postings seem to be taking a very distinct slant on a regular basis. Your writing suggests you are trying to convince yourself that UAL will go for the 747 -400LR, and also to reassure yourself that AI will not be entertained for widebodies. Nobody knows, except UAL, and no matter how many times you try to tell yourself otherwise, you will not influence their decision, it's not clear cut, not by a long shot.



User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10654 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (13 years 5 months 12 hours ago) and read 1236 times:

Looking at the fleet age of UAs B744s and 772s you´ll see that a lot of the Jumbos are actually newer than half of their Triple Seven fleet. Means that you can expect some 777s to be taken out of service prior to half of the 744 fleet! But thats 10-15 years from now.

UA without something bigger than a 777? Unthinkable. Stupid. An also uneconomical on some routes.
This has been discussed earlier several times, but wouldn´t it be strange if the USAs biggest airline would choose a European aircraft as their flagship? I see them order the 747X. Its just that they have a lot of new 744s. they don´t need to act anytime soon.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will ALLof Lufthansa's B 747-200s Go One Day? posted Tue Apr 3 2001 05:44:47 by United Airline
Will All Of UAL's B 744s Have Economy Plus Seats? posted Mon Mar 26 2001 13:03:59 by United Airline
How Do BA/UA Utilize All Of Their 747s? posted Wed Jun 25 2003 05:54:25 by 9V-SVE
Where Will All The MD-80's Go? posted Sat Jan 5 2002 19:38:20 by 717fan
When Will All Of Swissair's MD 11s Leave? posted Mon Jun 11 2001 15:37:49 by United Airline
When Did Continental Retire All Of Its B 747s? posted Wed May 16 2001 04:12:02 by United Airline
When Will All Of SIA's A 340-300s Leave? posted Sun May 13 2001 08:26:34 by United Airline
Will We See A Brand New B 727 One Day? posted Wed Jan 3 2001 09:02:03 by United Airline
Where Will UA 747s Go? posted Fri Oct 27 2006 18:40:15 by MEACEDAR
BA 747-400 (3 Of Them In YVR In One Day) posted Sat Jul 22 2006 08:05:05 by Ktachiya