LuckySevens From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1512 times:
I think they should call Airbus and get a whole buncha A380s for 747-400 prices while they can. It just makes sense.
Now, if Airbus were to actually bid out what the A380 cost to produce, then they should go 777-300ER and get 3x as many as they had -400s and just up the frequencies.
KonaB777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1469 times:
With no successor to the 747-400 (no, the 747-400LR doesn't count, I'm talking about a totally new plane) in the forseeable future (schematics don't count), eventually, if things stay the way they seem to be going, one day United may not have any more 747s. If things keep going the way they are going, when the time comes, if UA still wants a huge airplane, they may have to buy A380s, as that may be the only plane on the market for this group.
AA-SAN From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1444 times:
Come on guys... do you really think that UA is going to be flying 747s forever??? I give them 30 more years at max, and then, who knows what options airlines will have to replace these 747-400 "classics"?
ILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1419 times:
Let me ask everyone a question...
Have you noticed a trend that most other carriers are switching to the 777 over the 747 for their long hauls? Delta, American, and Continental has. British Airways will be trading 12 744s for 773ERs. What does that tell you?
It tells you that airlines are cutting capacity...not adding it! But they are operating more flights at any given day...which actually adds capacity. UA is starting to do that on their routes as we speak. The only reason that the 747 is still at United is because it has 100 more seats than the 777, but its operating costs are a lot higher, than a 777. Believe me, UA will dump the 747 for the 777. The A380 is too big for the routes served by United. The only few that could use an A380 are SFO-NRT/HFK, SFO-LHR, and JFK-NRT. NOt many huh? The skies are not that full, and with new technology, planes can fly higher, faster and farther...which is the case of the 777. The 777 is the future of avaition, and it will always have a big and a welcome home at United.
RayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8030 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1399 times:
While it is true that for this decade UA will be better off buying more 777-200ER's and start buying the 777-300ER, they ARE going to need something larger than a 747-400 once those planes reach their retirement age after 2013.
Remember, the number of passengers continues to grow on international flights, and airport landing slot capacity is definitely NOT increasing at the majority of Australasian airports unless massive amounts of money to expand airport capacity is spent NOW. Even now, the 747-400's UA flies on routes to NRT, SEL, HKG, PEK, and PVG are running at capacity, and UA's trans-Atlantic flights to LHR are also running at capacity. Flying more frequencies is NOT going to work in the long run because of the landing slot limitation issue.
Henceforth, while UA's 777 fleet will work wonders for long flights from smaller population centers to Asia and Europe, for flights from JFK, ORD, DEN, LAX and SFO, there will be a need for a larger plane, like it or not. UA could fill this need with the Airbus A380-800, or wait for Boeing to develop the Blended Wing Body (BWB) flying wing capable of seating 800+ passengers on a three-class configuration.
Aio86 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 928 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1376 times:
I was talking to a United A320 pilot around Christmas/Hannukah time 2000. I asked him if he thought UA would buy the 380. He said, "When the Airbus salesman/woman calls up United and asks if they want some, United will say, 'no we don't want any, but we'll take 15'" To put it simply, United will need to buy them to keep up and keep its name as the largest carrier in the world. Of course he told me this before the whole sit in the wings idea came about. But he thought that United will have them some day. However, that is just one pilot's opinion.
DeltaSFO From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 2488 posts, RR: 22
Reply 13, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1365 times:
Please.... what the hell kind of question is this. Will all of United's 737s go one day? Will all the 757s go one day? The 767s? How about the mighty Triple Sevens?
Of course they will all go one day. What, did you think United will still be flying 747s in 2060? How many DC-8s does UA still have in its fleet? How many L-1011s will Delta have after 31 July 01? How many DC-10s does American have?
It's a new day. Every moment matters. Now, more than ever.
Cba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1352 times:
What you all don't seem to realize is that Boeing has introduced a viable 744 replacement, the 747X (not stretch). The 747X (probably the 745) holds about 430 passengers, and has a range of 8900nm. This, along with the 772ER/LR, and 773ER is what UAL needs. I doubt that they need the capacity of the A380.
ILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
Reply 17, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1338 times:
United Ailrine...why did you even bother to post such a silly topic if you already knew the answer to the question? Are you some kind of super genius, or something like that? I find it funny how you post a question, then answer it like you the know the actuall answer. If you know United's future plans, please let me know, as I'm very very interested in what they may be.
Kangar From Ireland, joined Feb 2000, 395 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1316 times:
"The future of UAL will be B 747-400s, B 747-400LRs, B 777-200ER as well as B 777-300ER. " United Airline, your postings seem to be taking a very distinct slant on a regular basis. Your writing suggests you are trying to convince yourself that UAL will go for the 747 -400LR, and also to reassure yourself that AI will not be entertained for widebodies. Nobody knows, except UAL, and no matter how many times you try to tell yourself otherwise, you will not influence their decision, it's not clear cut, not by a long shot.
Na From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10805 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1307 times:
Looking at the fleet age of UAs B744s and 772s you´ll see that a lot of the Jumbos are actually newer than half of their Triple Seven fleet. Means that you can expect some 777s to be taken out of service prior to half of the 744 fleet! But thats 10-15 years from now.
UA without something bigger than a 777? Unthinkable. Stupid. An also uneconomical on some routes.
This has been discussed earlier several times, but wouldn´t it be strange if the USAs biggest airline would choose a European aircraft as their flagship? I see them order the 747X. Its just that they have a lot of new 744s. they don´t need to act anytime soon.