I have taken a number of flights on both the 777 and 340 with a number of different operators and feel that the 340 is a vastly superior plane in terms of the passenger comfort. The seats, configuration, facilities, cabin noise and in particular the quality of flight (incredibly smooth through takeoff, landing and throughout the flight) provide what I can only describe as a near perfect flying experience.
I am not looking at this from the technical view point and believe that the 777 is a truly awesome plane and in some ways superior to the 340, but in terms of passenger comfort and the Boeing survey I feel the 340 is the most comfortable plane in the sky.
Sadly I have not seen the questions upon which this survey is based and suspect that they are not that clear. I also suspect that the manufacturer is more influential than the aircraft type and that people simply favour Boeing over Airbus. In my experience the majority of people are blissfully unaware of the aircraft type they have flown on.
CPDC10-30 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 4791 posts, RR: 23
Reply 1, posted (13 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2219 times:
What you are missing is not realizing the source. Of course Boeing survey will find pax prefer their products. If you go to Airbus website, they claim that passengers prefer their cabin by an overwhelming margin. Its all spin and no truth. Both the A340 and 777 are great aircraft.
Na From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10763 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (13 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2186 times:
I´ve only been once on both aircraft (LH/BA). I liked the flight in the A340 better, but that was also because the 777-flight was "bumpy", the A340-flight perfectly smooth. The only thing I like on a 777 more is that it has the best interior design of all aircraft. Otherwise I tend to the A340, especially because of it being a Quad.
Statistics lie. The Boeing and Airbus surveys regarding these two aircraft proof that perfectly.
Rabenschlag From Germany, joined Oct 2000, 1010 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2177 times:
I'd say that app. 90% of my satisfaction with a flight are dependent on
- seat pitch
- ergonomics of seats
- onboard entertainment
- food quality
- friendliness of service
- general condition of the interior (I remember an AA B727 from JFK to MIA. Interior was very worn and dirty. Lavs. sent an intoxicating odour throughout the, well, plane).
so the differences that are due to AC type will be overshadowed in allmost every case by those factors mentioned above. Thus, I suspect that results in surveys comparing AC types are mostly random. Differences will be caused by other factors. Most importantly, there may be a correlation between AC type and airline that operates it.
For example, if you compare A340 and B777 you will likely enter LH as major A340 operator and BA as a major 777 operator. BUT they also differ with respect to all the other factors mentioned above, most probably leading to more satisfaction with the 777.
Sia jubilee From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2000, 145 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (13 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2117 times:
Hum....I prefer B777 more than A340.
As I honestly feel the comfort of B777 is more than A340.
I have flown only on A340 but never on 330 (believe thy are very similar of the cabin config).
I felt a bit narrow. And the leg room is really shorter than B777's.
I have flown on Thai's, Cathay Pacific's and Singapore's B777.
All of them are great! But thai put 10 seat per row in the 777......
For A340/330. I will not choose again the window seat. I have flown twice on 340, both of them were sitting on the window seat.............so....uncomfort. Maybe just my feeling but soem of friend feel that as well.
And I will concern the cruising speed of A340-200/300s.
RayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8018 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (13 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2110 times:
In my opinion, the big problem with the A330/A340 is the fact the overhead bins really cut down on the headroom on the window seats. Airbus is aware of this and is completely redesigning the overhead bins on the A340-500/600 series so there is much more headroom for the window seat passengers, and will make it available for new-build A330/A340 models in the future.
TEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (13 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2013 times:
The twin engine 777 has greater engine power especially for takeoff with a total thrust of over 180,000lbs versus the A340-200/300 with four 34,000lb thrust CFM56-5C4 engines with a total of only 136,000lbs.
JZ From United States of America, joined May 1999, 252 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (13 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1958 times:
I have flown both 777 and 330/340, in fact, I was on a 330-200 last week. My personal opinion is that because of the design of the overhead bins and the overall cabin dimension, there is more headroom on the 777; and it's easier to stand up and position yourself into the window seat. The sidewalls on the 777 is more vertical and doesn't 'come up' to you as on the 330/340. If a lavatory is on the side of the aircraft, in the 777 you can stand straight up and there is a good distance to ceiling; while in 330/340 your head is very close to the ceiling. Personally, I prefer 777 over 330/340.
After saying all that, I don't think most passengers will notice these small difference. Legroom is much more important than headroom. And I agree that although statistics doesn't lie, people use statistics for their own purpose.