Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AP Spiroid Funding Looks Wrong  
User currently offlineArt From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 3639 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1264 times:

From Flight:

Aviation Partners plans to begin testing its patented spiroid wingtip technology this autumn on the company's Dassault Falcon 50 business jet with help from $2 million from Washington. The money has been added to another spending bill by Washington Senator Patty Murray.

This later paragraph looks wrong -

Although the project will be booked as part of the FAA's wake turbulence research programme, the agency says the work is focused on fuel efficiency and is not connected to current wake vortex research programmes. "It's a way to provide funds to Aviation Partners," a senior FAA official says.

What! Hope nobody in Europe spots this. Smile

Seriously, what is going on? You can't book something to a specific field of research and at the same time say that it is not for that purpose.


2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDLPMMM From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 3672 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1235 times:

Happens all the time.

In the USA's system they call it a congressional plus-up. A congressional leader sticks a line item into the budget for a very specific program identified by a particular line item account number in the agency's budget. That account number was reserved for the particular company's program (less a 10% or so handling charge reserved for the budgeting agency).

Other countries have other terms for it such as bribery, corruption, doing business, or government as usual.

User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 15713 posts, RR: 28
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1194 times:

Quoting Art (Thread starter):
Hope nobody in Europe spots this.

Nah, they're all for this kind of stuff, going back to the Concorde days and even earlier.

Inspiration, move me brightly!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Looks Of The CRJ1000NG posted Sat Aug 2 2008 04:30:09 by OyKIE
When Airport Check In Goes Wrong. posted Mon Jul 21 2008 06:53:24 by Oly720man
77W Assigned Wrong Taxiway At LAX posted Sat Jun 28 2008 21:19:28 by MedAv
Helipad Landing Gone Wrong posted Sat Jun 21 2008 01:57:14 by ManuCH
Cargolux Looks At Cargoitalia Buy-out posted Wed Jun 18 2008 11:26:15 by LAXintl
IB: What's Wrong With Their A340s? posted Sat Jun 14 2008 14:51:45 by LY777
Right Or Wrong To Let A UM Pax Wait In Staff Room? posted Fri Jun 13 2008 12:46:58 by LH4116
What A 787 Flight Deck Really Looks Like (pics) posted Thu Jun 12 2008 21:31:38 by IAD787
What Is Wrong With This Picture? posted Tue Jun 10 2008 13:37:07 by Dispatchguy
AF/KL: Creating 'flying Is Cheap' Image Was Wrong posted Tue Jun 10 2008 04:18:36 by Costastic