Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Delta 777-200LR Routes?  
User currently offline413X3 From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 1983 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 18157 times:

I see the Delta 777-200LR going to Atlanta and Los Angeles from pictures on here. Where exactly does it fly to from there, only ATL-BOM ? What was the LAX flight then?

Thanks

67 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMCOAviationFan From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 247 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 18136 times:

The 777LR is used exclusively on the JFK-BOM route. It was used on NRT and LAX once or twice when the aircraft was first delivered, but since has been used to BOM only. It will be moved to ATL-BOM on Nov. 1, when the route changes. There is no word yet as to where DL will send the 6 777LR's which are slated for delivery this winter.

User currently onlineOA412 From United States of America, joined exactly 14 years ago today! , 5374 posts, RR: 25
Reply 2, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 18129 times:

Currently the 77L's fly JFK-BOM. In November they will switch to flying ATL-BOM. As of now, no other 77L routes have been announced but with a few coming end of this year/early next year, we're bound to hear something fairly soon.


Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlineOOer From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1507 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 17914 times:

New 77L routes...


ATL-BHM
ATL-CAE
ATL-SAV
ATL-HSV
ATL-CHA
ATL-CLT
ATL-JAX
ATL-MOB


Do you guys think the 77L will have the legs to do all these with the strong westbound headwinds during the winter???
 duck   duck   duck   duck   duck   duck   duck   duck 


User currently offlineJKJ777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 398 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 17905 times:



Quoting OOer (Reply 3):
ATL-BHM
ATL-CAE
ATL-SAV
ATL-HSV
ATL-CHA
ATL-CLT
ATL-JAX
ATL-MOB

hahahahhahahahahahahaha........
forgot ATL-MCN.


User currently offlineN867DA From United States of America, joined May 2008, 1012 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 17861 times:



Quoting OOer (Reply 3):
ATL-JAX

will take a huge weight penalty. I read in a bathroom stall at ATL that DL will buy A340-500s to do this route.

Is NRT a possibility? Maybe JNB or DXB could get one. I read on another thread DEL is a possibility but that too is probably just something from a bathroom stall at ATL.



A nation turns its lonely eyes to you
User currently offlineJfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8517 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 17816 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting MCOAviationFan (Reply 1):
There is no word yet as to where DL will send the 6 777LR's which are slated for delivery this winter.

6 77L's mean 3 routes of the really long type. Atlanta to HKG or SYD is my bet. They already fly to South Africa, India, Dubai, Kuwait, Argentina, Brazil and China. To use the long legs of the 77L DL isn't going to cross the Atlantic to go further east then India, it doing this already.


User currently offlineQFYMML From Australia, joined Jun 2007, 170 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 17774 times:

Would they duplicate the JFK-BOM route at all (i.e. ATL & JFK to BOM), or is it likely to be something entirely new?


A300,A319/20/21,A332/3,A343/5/6,717,727,732/3/4/5/7/8,74SP/2/3/4,752,762/3/4,77E/3/W,L1011,DC9,DC10,S340,DHC6/8,ATR72
User currently offlinePlanefxr From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 443 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 17679 times:

Even though a.netters say that it can't be done ....ATL-JNB

User currently offlineN867DA From United States of America, joined May 2008, 1012 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 17629 times:



Quoting QFYMML (Reply 7):
Would they duplicate the JFK-BOM route at all (i.e. ATL & JFK to BOM), or is it likely to be something entirely new?

As far as I know, DL is leaving the NYC-BOM market and starting ATL-BOM flights from 1 Nov. The press release said DL plans to resume JFK-BOM as soon as possible but that should be taken with a grain of salt.



A nation turns its lonely eyes to you
User currently offlineRwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3135 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 17601 times:

Given the two dozen threads that already address this topic, do we really need another one?

User currently offlineQFYMML From Australia, joined Jun 2007, 170 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 17584 times:



Quoting N867DA (Reply 9):
As far as I know, DL is leaving the NYC-BOM market and starting ATL-BOM flights from 1 Nov. The press release said DL plans to resume JFK-BOM as soon as possible but that should be taken with a grain of salt.

Thank you.



A300,A319/20/21,A332/3,A343/5/6,717,727,732/3/4/5/7/8,74SP/2/3/4,752,762/3/4,77E/3/W,L1011,DC9,DC10,S340,DHC6/8,ATR72
User currently offlineMCOAviationFan From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 247 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 17294 times:



Quoting Jfk777 (Reply 6):

6 77L's mean 3 routes of the really long type. Atlanta to HKG or SYD is my bet. They already fly to South Africa, India, Dubai, Kuwait, Argentina, Brazil and China. To use the long legs of the 77L DL isn't going to cross the Atlantic to go further east then India, it doing this already.

6 777LR's could actually work 4 routes if you pair an Atlantic destination with a Pacific destination such as ATL-TLV-ATL-NRT-ATL. Let's say HKG is announced. You could pair HKG with BOM and use 3 aircraft to service both routes.

Another possibility is to use the new 777LR's on current routes such as ATL-DXB or ATL-PVG and use the 777ER's freed up to fly something like JFK-NRT.


User currently offlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7822 posts, RR: 25
Reply 13, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 17195 times:



Quoting Planefxr (Reply 8):
Even though a.netters say that it can't be done ....ATL-JNB

Who said it cant be done? I think thats a good route for an LR.

I would imagine ATL-HKG or ATL-JNB would be a good moves for an LR.



Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineEvan767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 2957 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 17176 times:



Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 13):
Who said it cant be done? I think thats a good route for an LR.

It's been said in the past that JNB's hot, or at least their high restrictions will put a damper on the LR's performance. That along with western headwinds and a hot summer day in JNB, many think the LR won't make it without restrictions. But who says the flight has to leave in the middle of the day? I think a westbound flight should leave around midnight for maximum performance.



The proper term is "on final" not "on finals" bud...
User currently offlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7822 posts, RR: 25
Reply 15, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 17163 times:



Quoting Evan767 (Reply 14):
It's been said in the past that JNB's hot, or at least their high restrictions will put a damper on the LR's performance. That along with western headwinds and a hot summer day in JNB, many think the LR won't make it without restrictions. But who says the flight has to leave in the middle of the day? I think a westbound flight should leave around midnight for maximum performance.

An LR shouldnt have a problem with that flight. If it is a problem though, the flight should either leave in the morning or late at night and that should solve it.



Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineWorldTraveler From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 17137 times:



Quoting MCOAviationFan (Reply 12):
6 777LR's could actually work 4 routes if you pair an Atlantic destination with a Pacific destination such as ATL-TLV-ATL-NRT-ATL. Let's say HKG is announced. You could pair HKG with BOM and use 3 aircraft to service both routes.

Another possibility is to use the new 777LR's on current routes such as ATL-DXB or ATL-PVG and use the 777ER's freed up to fly something like JFK-NRT.

combining Atlantic and Pacific routes to use 3 a/c for 4 routes doesn't work when both flights are pushing or exceeding 16 hrs on each leg. The ER works fine for that kind of routing because 16 hrs is pretty much the limit of the plane. DL could use an LR on a shorter flight like ATL-DXB and pair it with an ATL-HKG but you can't do two true LR routes the the 72 hrs it takes to complete a rotation and still have a few minutes to clean and service the plane.

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 15):
Quoting Evan767 (Reply 14):
It's been said in the past that JNB's hot, or at least their high restrictions will put a damper on the LR's performance. That along with western headwinds and a hot summer day in JNB, many think the LR won't make it without restrictions. But who says the flight has to leave in the middle of the day? I think a westbound flight should leave around midnight for maximum performance.

An LR shouldnt have a problem with that flight. If it is a problem though, the flight should either leave in the morning or late at night and that should solve it.

we've seen arguments both ways but I say the LR can do it... Boeing has told DL as much .. and we will see it in time. The glut of capacity in India only increases the probability of seeing ATL-JNB nonstop


User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17829 posts, RR: 46
Reply 17, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 17097 times:



Quoting Evan767 (Reply 14):
It's been said in the past that JNB's hot, or at least their high restrictions will put a damper on the LR's performance.

I could see ATLJNB going nonstop, but that would likely mean CPTJFK is ended since it depends in part on feed from ATL. Perhaps this bodes well for ATL-JNB-CPT-ATL? I'm not a fan of triangular routings but it would alleviate any operational problems at JNB.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offline413X3 From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 1983 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 17009 times:



Quoting RwSEA (Reply 10):
Given the two dozen threads that already address this topic, do we really need another one?

I could not find anything recent regarding their routes, or explaining what route it was flying to LAX. Is your whining really necessary?


User currently offlineFlyDreamliner From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 2759 posts, RR: 15
Reply 19, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 16196 times:



Quoting Planefxr (Reply 8):
Even though a.netters say that it can't be done ....ATL-JNB

JNB is pretty high up, and it's hot. SA isn't able to really do the nonstop with the A346. Maybe if they bought A345s or something, but they aren't. CPT is a little further, and a little less O and D, but it's neither hot nor high, really.

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 17):
I could see ATLJNB going nonstop, but that would likely mean CPTJFK is ended since it depends in part on feed from ATL. Perhaps this bodes well for ATL-JNB-CPT-ATL? I'm not a fan of triangular routings but it would alleviate any operational problems at JNB.

The 772LR's, and 777s in general are a crucial commodity at DL. It will be slightly alleviated by the arrival of the NW A332s and 744s. The setup right now, using DKR as a hub, allows traffic from both JFK and ATL to serve the local west african market, as well as both JNB and CPT. Going nonstop offers no tangible benefit, really, since none of their competition is nonstop, but cuts their feeds. I say CPT and JNB stay one-stop at DKR. I think we'll see JFK-DKR-CPT go 5-7 day/week on the 767-300 and ATL-DKR-JNB go to an A330-200 or A330-300, post merger.

We'll see a 772LR go ATL-HKG, I'm sure. We might see a LAX-BKK or something. I'm sure ATL-PVG will likely be moved to 772LR.



"Let the world change you, and you can change the world"
User currently offlineDeltaL1011man From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 9700 posts, RR: 15
Reply 20, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 15902 times:



Quoting Planefxr (Reply 8):

Even though a.netters say that it can't be done ....ATL-JNB

Not just a.netters. Glenn still isn't sure.

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 10):

Given the two dozen threads that already address this topic, do we really need another one?

Its better than a DL/NW merger thread.

Quoting MCOAviationFan (Reply 12):
Another possibility is to use the new 777LR's on current routes such as ATL-DXB or ATL-PVG and use the 777ER's freed up to fly something like JFK-NRT.

hmmm could be

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 13):
Who said it cant be done? I think thats a good route for an LR.

To hot and to High and to short of a runway.

Quoting WorldTraveler (Reply 16):
like ATL-DXB and pair it with an ATL-HKG

hmmmmm good idea. Then take the 77E off of ATL-DXB and send it from JFK to NRT.

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 17):
but that would likely mean CPTJFK is ended since it depends in part on feed from ATL

No it wouldn't. CPT isn't going anywhere. Do you not like CPT or something? You seem to have a bais against it.

Quoting FlyDreamliner (Reply 19):
The 772LR's, and 777s in general are a crucial commodity at DL. It will be slightly alleviated by the arrival of the NW A332s and 744s. The setup right now, using DKR as a hub, allows traffic from both JFK and ATL to serve the local west african market, as well as both JNB and CPT. Going nonstop offers no tangible benefit, really, since none of their competition is nonstop, but cuts their feeds. I say CPT and JNB stay one-stop at DKR. I think we'll see JFK-DKR-CPT go 5-7 day/week on the 767-300 and ATL-DKR-JNB go to an A330-200 or A330-300, post merger.

agreed. DKR is a small hub and it was picked due to DL having 5th freedom rights. it is very likely that JNB will get an up grade but not a 777. (think bigger than a 777 smaller than a 744)



yep.
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17829 posts, RR: 46
Reply 21, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 15789 times:



Quoting DeltaL1011man (Reply 20):
CPT isn't going anywhere. Do you not like CPT or something? You seem to have a bais against it

I love CPT and I'd love to go back. As an airline I wouldn't want to fly there from the USA for a long time because it's all back cabin leisure demand and not that big of a market. It'd probably be better left to AF out of CDG, in addition to KL at AMS, since the market is bigger and the flight is less costly. Look at the seat map any day and it'll be just as you'd expect--jammed in the back and tumbleweeds up front--incidentally just like AMM and ACC.

Quoting DeltaL1011man (Reply 20):
DKR is a small hub and it was picked due to DL having 5th freedom rights.

It's got 1.4 daily DL flights and is tremendously over served to North America currently. It's a stop to refuel and shuffle some passengers between flights and the experience is not very good apparently. Just boarding a flight in DKR is a goat rodeo.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineWorldTraveler From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 15719 times:



Quoting FlyDreamliner (Reply 19):
JNB is pretty high up, and it's hot. SA isn't able to really do the nonstop with the A346. Maybe if they bought A345s or something, but they aren't. CPT is a little further, and a little less O and D, but it's neither hot nor high, really.

CPT has a 10,000 ft runway which is on the short side except for an LR.

Quoting FlyDreamliner (Reply 19):
Going nonstop offers no tangible benefit, really, since none of their competition is nonstop, but cuts their feeds. I

going nonstop would give DL a huge revenue benefit. If you are the onlycarrier offering nonstops in both directions, you will get a revenue premium and a disproportionately large share of the market.... its true about any market.

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 21):
Quoting DeltaL1011man (Reply 20):
CPT isn't going anywhere. Do you not like CPT or something? You seem to have a bais against it

I love CPT and I'd love to go back. As an airline I wouldn't want to fly there from the USA for a long time because it's all back cabin leisure demand and not that big of a market. It'd probably be better left to AF out of CDG, in addition to KL at AMS, since the market is bigger and the flight is less costly. Look at the seat map any day and it'll be just as you'd expect--jammed in the back and tumbleweeds up front--incidentally just like AMM and ACC.

CPT is doing very well and DL does in fact carry enough premium traffic. It also generates good cargo revenue because it is at sea level and any plane can fly CPT to DKR w/ full passenger and cargo loads.


User currently offlineDeltaL1011man From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 9700 posts, RR: 15
Reply 23, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 15662 times:



Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 21):
I love CPT and I'd love to go back. As an airline I wouldn't want to fly there from the USA for a long time because it's all back cabin leisure demand and not that big of a market. It'd probably be better left to AF out of CDG, in addition to KL at AMS, since the market is bigger and the flight is less costly. Look at the seat map any day and it'll be just as you'd expect--jammed in the back and tumbleweeds up front--incidentally just like AMM and ACC.

I check the loads on the flights all the time..........i see nothing wrong. C does pretty good. Not great but good. Cargo is good also.

Quoting WorldTraveler (Reply 22):
going nonstop would give DL a huge revenue benefit. If you are the onlycarrier offering nonstops in both directions, you will get a revenue premium and a disproportionately large share of the market.... its true about any market.

One thing WT,Delta is the only carrier in the market. so it really doesn't matter.



yep.
User currently onlineOA412 From United States of America, joined exactly 14 years ago today! , 5374 posts, RR: 25
Reply 24, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 15623 times:



Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 21):
Look at the seat map any day and it'll be just as you'd expect--jammed in the back and tumbleweeds up front--incidentally just like AMM and ACC.

I don't know about the other two but I do remember hearing about a year ago that ACC was actually DL's 2nd highest yielding flight at the time. Apparently Y fares are high enough to offset the lesser demand for C seats. Unfortunately I haven't heard anything about the flight lately so cannot confirm if the above info is still true or not.



Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
25 MaverickM11 : Ah yes, the "but the cargo is great" argument. I'd believe that. Now add the expenses of an tag onto ACC down to CPT and not much of a higher fare.[E
26 OA412 : JFK-CPT is actually flown via DKR not ACC. The ACC route is just JFK-ACC-JFK.
27 MaverickM11 : Yes I know--I'm saying imagine if JFKACC had a further tag onto South Africa, but without a major increase in the fare.
28 Evan767 : That's a fairly true statement. However, AMM and CPT are relatively new. I'd definitely give them time to pick up in the front. The thing wrong with
29 Jfk777 : ATL - Dubai or another 77E route will be replaced by 77L's for JFK to NRT. Delta last March started Atlanta to PVG, in March 2009 its ATL to Peking.
30 MCOAviationFan : Has this been announced by DL already, or is this your opinion?
31 DeltaL1011man : DL didn't get the rights to fly to PEK. They got ATL-PVG but not ATL-PEK. DL could have 4-8 new routes out of the 77Ls. Like someone said you could d
32 DUALRATED : I'm sure it's been asked but, anyone have the list for all 777 routes???
33 WorldTraveler : if DL was the only carrier, they wouldnt bother to use a nonstop aircraft. In fact, they wouldn't bother to upgrade the aircraft at all and would sti
34 MaverickM11 : Wow....someone was singing a mighty different tune when they upgraded BOMJFK from an ER to an LR
35 MCOAviationFan : DL could also wait until the spring/summer of 2009 to begin new routes with the 6 new 777LR's. The 777 fleet will be undergoing mods this winter to in
36 WorldTraveler : BOMJFK can not be operated year round without passenger restrictions so using an LR does make sense. That is not the case for any other existing DL 7
37 OA412 : Oh OK. Nevermind then. I misunderstood what you were getting at.
38 Jetlanta : Now come on Maverick, for the first time in ages this board has been civil for a couple of days. Did you really have to go there? For all the people
39 FlyDreamliner : Well, I would agree - except that on a per passenger basis, doing it nonstop takes a great deal more fuel, and cargo is a huge part of those routes,
40 Jfk777 : The route is not going away just a switch to 77L from 77E.
41 CokePopper : As regards to ATL-JNB, Glen mentioned in an online chat with employees (July8) that Delta is looking at making this route non-stop with the LR's.
42 Post contains links CokePopper : It also looks like the rumor of SYD is being kept alive: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...ory/0,25197,24181162-20142,00.html "suggest Delta want
43 MaverickM11 : Yeesh....it would look a lot like JFKBOM but with much less feed on the LAX end. How many times have we heard about all the wondrous cargo DL can car
44 Jfk777 : Suggests an interesting point, is LAX going to become an Asian gateway for the new Delta/NW ? LAX to Sydney is a great diversification for Delta. Thi
45 Evan767 : Indeed, put the LR on ATL-DXB for full performance and take that ER for ATL-LAX-SYD.
46 WorldTraveler : Face it… we can debate the merits of JNB nonstop or one stop all day long and DL has probably run its best forecasts over and over both ways. Bottom
47 Jacobin777 : As much as I'm extremely biased towards the B772ER ...SYD-LAX would be really pressing the -200ER, especially with headwinds, competition,etc. The -2
48 DeltaL1011man : I know that but DXB would get to carry more cargo if the 77L was on it. To hot for the 77E Not as much as they would with the 77L I wish L1011s would
49 MaverickM11 : I wouldn't be surprised if they upgraded ATLDXB, primarily because the other options don't seem very appealing.
50 WorldTraveler : LAX-SYD is quite a bit shorter in flying time than other 777ER flights, including PVG-ATL which carries cargo There are no performance restrictions th
51 DeltaL1011man : I agree. Plus the New C seats which they can charge more for. Not just the Cargo but the 77Ls are much nicer than the 77Es. They will have to really
52 Jfk777 : Yes a 77L caries more cargo but DL has routes only possile with 77L's and those which could be flown by both. Delta just needs more 777 or 787's.
53 SunriseValley : I assume that you are all talking about JNB-ATL non-stop. JNB's mean temperature range in January is 14.7C min 25.6C max and in July, 4.1C min and 16
54 WorldTraveler : The lie flat seats in business will be added to the ER this winter (which might explain why DL is not planning to put the new LRs into use right away
55 SunriseValley : Thanks WorldTraveler; it is always helpful to get confirmation on this sort of analysis. Not always am I correct !
56 Post contains images Jacobin777 : You are giving "still air ranges" however the route with nice stiff headwinds would run into some serious restrictions, especially during the winter
57 AirNZ : Whoa! wait a minute......didn't you just say in post #22 about being the only one with a non-stop meant DL could charge a revenue premium and claim a
58 WorldTraveler : no, I am using time aloft which is the real measure of comparison on different routes.... it is already flown by other airlines using similar speed a
59 Post contains links Jacobin777 : That's still improper....you haven't taken other variables into consideration....flight-time really isn't an accurate measure.. ....here are just a c
60 WorldTraveler : which still says that the time a flght is aloft is a pretty good measure of an airplane's endurance. a 772ER on NYC-India might be the appropriate air
61 DeltaL1011man : Also dropping ATL-ICN back down to 3x weekly. 77E 7,700nm. 77L 8,500nm(with no extra tanks which is what DL has now) 77W 8,000nm 744 7,300nm 74E 7,70
62 Jumbojet : By the way, I'll be on this flight in November. I've done Korean air many times from the states to ICN but this will be the 1st time on Delta metal.
63 MaverickM11 : Lower unit costs I think that's more because there's too much capacity in ATLICN and the route is running weak load factors
64 Post contains images Jacobin777 : ..as well as more uplift capabilities and range. ..while I know who your comment is addressed to, I hope you were referring to yourself. .. ...how ab
65 DeltaL1011man : Now true question is why is that winglet in ATL? IIRC you went SJC-DFW-ATL so why is it a 738 and not an S80. I though only the JFK/MIA hubs got 738s
66 Cubastar : You Light Up My Life! That's exactly what we used to say........ATL-FRA-ATL with a BHM turn at the end of the rotation. I'm being facetious of course
67 Jacobin777 : DFW sees the works...MadDogs as well as B738's... I'm glad you got a kick out of my photo... Apropos, how far do you live from Macon? Macon was kind
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Delta 777-200LR In Flight Pics (High Quality) posted Sun Apr 6 2008 18:40:56 by MSYtristar
Pretty Cool Video Of Delta's 777-200LR posted Thu Mar 27 2008 11:53:30 by Aruba
Delta 777-200LR In TUS posted Sat Feb 9 2008 23:00:43 by Skyweasy82
Delta 777-200LR Order posted Thu Sep 21 2006 18:10:07 by 1337Delta764
New Delta 777-200 Routes? posted Sun Feb 17 2002 01:35:20 by Airplanetire
Delta Takes Delivery Of 777-200LR Simulator posted Mon May 26 2008 15:50:22 by Flynavy
Delta Wants More Range From Boeing 777-200LR posted Mon Mar 17 2008 04:11:16 by ClassicLover
Delta Planning A Large 777-200LR Order? posted Mon Nov 19 2007 15:26:49 by 1337Delta764
No ULR Routes For 777-200LR? posted Sun Jul 29 2007 05:50:50 by Hodja
Delta 777 Routes posted Tue Jan 9 2007 23:20:28 by MikeSA
Potential Routes Of Delta 777-200LR posted Thu Jun 29 2006 04:01:11 by SLCUT2777
More Delta 777-200LR's posted Mon Dec 1 2008 12:02:34 by Jfk777
Delta 777-200LR To Kuwait City posted Sat Nov 29 2008 19:40:56 by Flynavy
BOS Spotters: Delta 777-200LR Inbound! posted Mon Nov 24 2008 12:55:52 by Flynavy
Delta 777-200LR In Flight Pics (High Quality) posted Sun Apr 6 2008 18:40:56 by MSYtristar
Pretty Cool Video Of Delta's 777-200LR posted Thu Mar 27 2008 11:53:30 by Aruba
Delta 777-200LR In TUS posted Sat Feb 9 2008 23:00:43 by Skyweasy82
Delta 777-200LR Order posted Thu Sep 21 2006 18:10:07 by 1337Delta764
New Delta 777-200 Routes? posted Sun Feb 17 2002 01:35:20 by Airplanetire
Delta 777 And 330 Routes Out Of JFK? posted Sat Mar 13 2010 06:54:21 by Mudboy