Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
These Damn Mergers!  
User currently offlineJzucker From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 100 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 975 times:

IS ANYONE ELSE SAD TO SEE MANY GREAT AIRLINES MERGING? THIS ACTION IS BREAKING THE VERY FABRIC OF THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY!


MY SOLUTION~ RAISE PRICES ON TICKETS SO THAT LESS PEOPLE CAN AFFORD TO FLY.......
~ THEN THE COMPETITION BETWEEN AIRLINES WILL LOWER THEM AGAIN!

JOSH (talk2jz@hotmail.com)

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 47
Reply 1, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 936 times:

Obviously a case of an uninformed kid....

That is just part of the free enterprise system.

If you think that times are "bad" now, then thank your lucky stars that you didn't bear witness to what happened in the mid 1980's.

In the span of two (2...yes only TWO) years 1985-1987), the following airlines vanished via takeover:


AirCal (by American)
PSA (By USAir)
Western (By Delta)
Republic (by Northwest)
Jet America (by Alaska)
Muse Air/TranStar (by Southwest)
Frontier (By PEOPLExpress)
PEOPLExpress (by Continental)
Empire (by Piedmont)
New York Air (by Continental)
Florida Express (by Braniff)
Air Florida (via Midway)

I hope I didn't forget anyone.

Now don't even get me started on how many airlines simply folded.

I remember that time period, and what we see today, is a walk in the park compared to then.


User currently offlineJzucker From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 919 times:

I don't deny that I am an "UNINFORMED KID", despite the fact that I did not particularly care for your tone. I do hold a private pilots license at the age of 17 and have over 150 hours logged. Truth be told, I am "informed" in many aviation related topics to a greater extent than you....Okay, so I may be speculating! IN FACT, my youngness has prevented me from seeing much of the takeovers you mentioned. I am naive in believing that the Aviation World now is what it always was..

I ask any patient people out there to respond, even predict the future of the industry I will have a career in, and the industry I love.

I for one, will be sad to see especially USairways join UAL, which is the biggest airline now anyway. I LIKE DIVERSITY.

So Matt, please don't judge me because of my age. Even young, "misinformed kids" can love aviation. And to everyone else, thanks in advance for the kind feedback!
Josh


User currently offlineIkarus From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 3524 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 910 times:

MattD, which of these airlines were as big/famous as TWA, or US Air?

What is happening right now in America is on a bigger scale than the once-rumoured KLM/BA merger and the only way I could imagine anything nearly as big in Europe would be for LH and AF to merge or something similar.

To be honest, I do prefer them merging to them going bust like PanAm....


User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 47
Reply 4, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 905 times:

From an enthusiasts standpoint, it makes little difference whether an airline goes bust or gets swallowed. In the end, the name vanishes.
Although I agree, a merger would be the better road, and for two reasons:

1. From an enthusiasts POV, the transition and hybrid liveries provide a great excuse to take trips and take a lot more pictures

2. From a business standpoint, I can't imagine what anyones argument could be.
A merger means that most of the employees will have continued employment whereas a shutdown leaves everyone out in the cold. Not only does their week to week livlihood go out the windows, but their beneifits, pensions, etc also evaporate.

JZUCKER:
I certainly don't mean to sound belligerent, and kudos to you for your flying accomplishments.
But you suggesting that we "raise the price of airfares so no one can fly" is nothing short of ludicrous.
First of all, last minute, First Class, and Business Class fares are already beyond the reach of the average persons pocket book. I'd be willing to bet that most (>75% of those you see flying those services) either are redeeming FF miles and/or their employer is paying for the flight. Second, what would be the point of hobbling the airline industry through "higher fares"?
Just so your beloved Air XXX livery will be around for you to look at it longer?
What you are suggesting speaks one of two things:

Price fixing/collusion (which is difficult to prove, but nonetheless very illegal)
Re-regulation (isn't the government too big already?)

So explain your logic to us please.


User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 900 times:

Jzucker - Although you do have your PPL and 150TT, that does not substitute the knowledge of business you need to be able to discuss these mergers in depth.

Mergers can be very good for us, as aviation enthusiast, passengers, and be very bad. What the US goverment has to decide is if US Airways and United do merge will that have the consequences you have mentioned above. If it passes they feel that the maket will be closer to perfect competition therefore it will not effect the market price. If they rule that the merge between US Airways and United would Monopolies the market, and not provid fair competition then they will rule against it!

Iain


User currently offlineJzucker From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 889 times:

Matt!
Thank you for your reasonable response. I will admit to almost regretting having posted that last message. I will further say that even my first one may have been a bit pre-mature. Let me attempt to clarify my thinking, despite the fact that it may be naive in its logic:

First and foremost. It is a fact that the number of people flying has drastically increased. If my sources are correct, there will be a 20% increase in the flying public in the years to come.

FACT: The ATC system is struggling with its outdated technology..upgrades are far and few between

FACT: Airport expansion seems to slow to accolmadate the growth in traffic

Yes, you have made it clear that already many mergers have taken place. But if we could freeze time, how would you rate our current situation? The flying public does not need a global giant that will control prices and airtravel. Having competition is favorable in the eyes of the consumers. C'mon...all of the alliances have already made unified global travel and earning frequent flier miles a breeze. OKAY...so raising ticket prices is not a good idea, However I stand by my opinion that continued merging leading to one or two giants is not in the best interest of the industry.

I can certainly be swayed with more educated information, I will admit.  Smile Thanks... Josh


User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 884 times:

Josh your facts really having nothing to do with your point. Your point is you want the airline industry to become a 'perfect market'! The airline industry is a very strange one, think of how Pan Am was teh largest thing flying in the US for years, and they went bust, and British Airways ruled the skies over Britian, and now a having problems with 2 carriers, Easyjet and Virgin. I think what is happening with mergers is just these major carriers taking large hops instead of a steady walk!
Iain


User currently offlineJzucker From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 879 times:

Iain~

I think your right. I will be entering an aviation college next year, and to be honest with you, i am more worried than anything that after another 5 or 6 years of education and flight instructing, the industry will not be what it is now. Logically I know it wont and cannot be. But I love to fly. Whether there are 5 world airlines, or 50, I will be satisfied having a seat in the flight deck no matter what turns the industry takes.

BTW.....My double Major is in Business Management, maybe then ill attempt this subject again. Just give me another 4 years.


User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 874 times:

Josh we seem to have a lot in common, I too am a 17 year old Private Pilot, currently study Business at University, luckily for me I graduate next year! The industry might not be the same, as far as the way the competitive market is set up, however I sure prices will not skyrocket, and there will be more demand for pilots then there currently is!
Iain


User currently offlineCody From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1931 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 860 times:

It's not only sad its dangerous. Now the TWA deal I can let slide a little because their very existence depends on it, but the USAirways and United deal is a problem I think. It's main purpose is to line the pockets of just a few people. I keep hearing these goofy remarks about how it is necessary but the truth is it is not. USAirways has spent the better part of the year sitting idle and not making any plans except this merger. In the meantime they are getting behind the curve. I am saying this with the background of an economics degree and a commercial pilot's license so please do not call me an uninformed kid. For those of you wanting a job in aviation in the future, beware of these deals. It's sinister, it's bad. Trust no one. Just because someone tells you a deal is necessary does not make it so. Look at things from a new prospective.

User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5480 posts, RR: 15
Reply 11, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 838 times:

UA/US, I really have no clue why those two plan to merge. With AA/TW, AA is saving TWA and it's employees, aircraft, routes,slots, etc.
rgds,
blink182



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Effects Of These Mergers At Your Airport posted Thu Nov 16 2006 17:04:07 by ERJ170
UAL+US, AA+TWA Are These Mergers Doom For Other's? posted Wed Jan 10 2001 05:17:40 by Jm-airbus320
Mergers: When Too Big Is Really Too Big posted Thu Aug 20 2009 17:41:50 by Tavong
Are These The First 2 767-300ER's To Be Scrapped? posted Tue Aug 18 2009 05:44:08 by 76er
Seniority Lists And Integration/mergers posted Thu Aug 13 2009 09:51:22 by Chuchoteur
"These Damned Planespotters...." posted Tue Aug 11 2009 03:04:21 by N14AZ
WN,Mergers And Employee Integration posted Mon Aug 10 2009 19:49:04 by ItalianFlyer
Who's Making Money These Days? posted Thu Aug 6 2009 13:54:51 by Boeingluvr
Where Are These Planes Heading To? posted Thu Jul 16 2009 10:23:55 by 7324ever
Am I Allowed To Carry These Two Bags On The Plane? posted Mon Jun 15 2009 10:53:21 by MD1982