Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A3xxx  
User currently offlineMad dog From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1132 times:

Is the aircraft still in production. If it is will it be profitable.. Also the safety of the aircraft. I heard this will be a double decker like the 747-- how do you evacuate so many people on such a large aircraft--especially all the emergency exits doors it will need? The wingspan is going to have to be quite large to generate the lift of this big bird-suppose to be bigger than the 747..Just curious.

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHawaiian717 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3176 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1065 times:

The aircraft was just launched last year and production of the first aircraft is still a bit away from actually starting. The aircraft was officially designated on launch as the A380.

David


User currently offlineRen41 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1524 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1045 times:

Welcome to airliners.net! Big thumbs up its now called the A380 and you can search for tons of other posts regarding the plane.

Ren41


User currently offlineDatamanA340 From South Korea, joined Dec 2000, 547 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1011 times:

A380 is complete double-decker (I remember Boeing had similar idea named B2707.) with 4 engines. Because 380 has 9 full-sized exits on each side, airliners can put up to 990 seats on this airplane, but Airbus proposed standard 3-class configuration made of 555 seats, so it's far safer than formal 744 (400 seats normally, up to 580) or 773 (350 seats normally, up to 550). By Airbus's figures, it's wingspan is 79.3 meters, 15 meters longer than 744. For addition, it's fuselage is shorter than both of 773 and 346. Because it's big, 380 will have engine with 1.8x thrust of 744, so there's no problem for takeoff, unless one of wings are broken away.

But, but, first of all, I'm talking about 380, which was 3xx formerly, but what's A3xxx?


User currently offlineRIX From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1785 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 990 times:

Similar idea of Boeing was NLA. 2707 was Boeing SST idea. About exit doors & safety: there are rules to be kept (B737-900 is a good example - it gives more configuration flexibility than 737-800 as it is bigger, but since it has the same amount of exits, total passengers number is the same for both). Every aircraft flying keeps these rules (of course!). So I'm not sure that A380 is "far safer" from this point of view than anything flying today. By the other hand, an exit is a hole in the fuselage. In some situation extra hole may be critical for structural integrity, and then nobody will care about extra exits - there would be no one alive to use them... Of course, any of those guys who designs A380 knows this far better than we all together - but so all the other guys who designed everything else flying with less exits per passenger.

User currently offlineDatamanA340 From South Korea, joined Dec 2000, 547 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 963 times:

RIX: Great words.

Of course when we say '380 is safer because it has enough exits', this 380 is regarded as with 'standard' 555 seats. 380-seated 744 should be safer than JAL's or ANA's 568-seated 744D, although 568-seated 744D still keeps rules.




User currently offlineAirbus A380 From Singapore, joined Jan 2001, 522 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 959 times:

Hear ye, hear ye

It's me A380. The A380 is not yet in production, even the prototype was not developed yet. The first flight was targetted at 2004 and first deliver ies should begin late-2005 or early-2006. I remember Boeing even has plans to develop a Boeing 747 SDD or Super Double Decker, because I read this in a book, about FLA. Al so read about McDonnell Douglas's MD12 Double Decker.


User currently offlineGOT From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 1912 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 month 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 944 times:

For more information check out Airbus homepage, http://www.airbus.com.

GOT



Just like birdwatching - without having to be so damned quiet!
User currently offlineRIX From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1785 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 933 times:

Dataman340, I agree.

By the way, there was even VC10 double-decker idea. I remember a picture of it with two rows of windows...


User currently offlineSpaceman From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 534 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (13 years 1 month 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 922 times:

First of all it's not A3xxx it's A3XX before it was launched. To my understandings pax on upperfloor will have their own emergency exits. They will probably need a very long slide to get to the ground, just like the 747 upper deck. The first production aircraft will fly in 2006.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A3XXX Runway Lengths... posted Sun Dec 10 2000 02:04:41 by KLMBlue
A3XXX posted Sat Nov 27 1999 09:04:40 by Thai747