Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing 777-200/200ER P2F Conversion Study.  
User currently offlineWINGS From Portugal, joined May 2005, 2831 posts, RR: 68
Posted (6 years 2 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 35465 times:

I found the following article very interesting. It is well worth the read and gives a better understanding of what will be evolved in in the likely process of passenger 777-200/200ER being converted into cargo freighters. From I gather the process will not be a simple task.



http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...sion-development-studies-for.html.

Boeing has begun studying passenger-to-freighter (P2F) conversion products for the Boeing 777 as it prepares to potentially launch a 777-200 Boeing Converted Freighter (BCF) and a 777-200ER BCF early next decade.

Dennis Floyd revealed "product development studies" were underway for both the 777-200 BCF and 777-200ER BCF.

Charts from Floyd's presentation show the 777-200ER BCF offering cargo carriers a revenue payload of roughly 180,000lbs (81.6t), give or take about 15,000lbs, and the shorter-range 777-200 BCF a payload of roughly 145,000lbs (65.8t), again give or take about 15,000lbs.

"In the long-run we see 777 as a replacement for 747-400s," Fortune says.

He says converting 777s will be far more complicated than converting 747-400s given all the new technology that debuted in the 777, in particular in the cockpit. "It's like converting a convertible into a pick-up truck. It will be a challenge," Floyd says.

Fortune says the technical complexity associated with the 777s will make it very difficult for any company but Boeing to offer conversion products for the 777.


Regards,
Wings


Aviation Is A Passion.
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKhenleyDIA From Sweden, joined Feb 2005, 427 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 2 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 35412 times:

Maybe a stupid question, but I don't really understand why it will be that difficult. They have a flying freighter now. Why can't they look at the early 777 and the 777F and kind match up the needed changes? (Over simplification, I know) But I would have thought that the new technology would help make it easier to do.

On another note, as it says in the article, I don't see this happening for a while.

KhenleyDIA



Why sit at home and do nothing when you can travel the world.
User currently offlineOldAeroGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 3574 posts, RR: 67
Reply 2, posted (6 years 2 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 35348 times:



Quoting KhenleyDIA (Reply 1):
Maybe a stupid question, but I don't really understand why it will be that difficult. They have a flying freighter now. Why can't they look at the early 777 and the 777F and kind match up the needed changes?

One reason there isn't a direct read across is that the passenger 777's use graphite floor beams while the 777F uses aluminum.

Doesn't mean the conversion is impossible, but it does mean the 777F cargo system engineering and design can't be used directly.



Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
EK Boeing 777-200 posted Mon Apr 3 2006 15:55:43 by Metti
RG Introduces Boeing 777-200 To FRA posted Thu Oct 21 2004 15:56:28 by Hardiwv
Biz Boeing 777-200 posted Sat Aug 7 2004 21:28:41 by Boeing777300
SQ 777-200/200ER Registration posted Fri Apr 23 2004 04:19:28 by SQ452
Boeing 777-200 Freighter posted Thu Oct 9 2003 07:12:50 by Behramjee
Boeing 777-200 Best Seat posted Sat Sep 1 2001 16:48:26 by OEisl@VIE
Boeing 777-200 posted Tue May 25 1999 04:44:33 by DELTA FLYER
787-10 Versus 777-200, 777-200ER, And 777-200LR posted Fri Jun 16 2006 20:59:30 by AerospaceFan
AA's 777's - 200 Or 200ER? posted Mon Jun 12 2006 19:15:49 by Rwylie77
AA Boeing 777 Conversion From Pacific To Atlantic posted Fri Jan 14 2005 05:34:53 by Carfield
RG Introduces Boeing 777-200 To FRA posted Thu Oct 21 2004 15:56:28 by Hardiwv
Biz Boeing 777-200 posted Sat Aug 7 2004 21:28:41 by Boeing777300
SQ 777-200/200ER Registration posted Fri Apr 23 2004 04:19:28 by SQ452
Boeing 777-200 Freighter posted Thu Oct 9 2003 07:12:50 by Behramjee
Boeing 777-200 Best Seat posted Sat Sep 1 2001 16:48:26 by OEisl@VIE
Boeing 777-200 posted Tue May 25 1999 04:44:33 by DELTA FLYER
787-10 Versus 777-200, 777-200ER, And 777-200LR posted Fri Jun 16 2006 20:59:30 by AerospaceFan
Boeing 777-200 Best Seat posted Sat Sep 1 2001 16:48:26 by OEisl@VIE
Boeing 777-200 posted Tue May 25 1999 04:44:33 by DELTA FLYER
Mystery VIP Boeing 777-200 posted Sun Feb 14 2010 22:59:31 by tomascubero
Future Of 777-200/-200ER? posted Mon Mar 5 2007 00:04:20 by AviationAddict
EK Boeing 777-200 posted Mon Apr 3 2006 15:55:43 by Metti
RG Introduces Boeing 777-200 To FRA posted Thu Oct 21 2004 15:56:28 by Hardiwv
Biz Boeing 777-200 posted Sat Aug 7 2004 21:28:41 by Boeing777300
SQ 777-200/200ER Registration posted Fri Apr 23 2004 04:19:28 by SQ452
Boeing 777-200 Freighter posted Thu Oct 9 2003 07:12:50 by Behramjee
Boeing 777-200 Best Seat posted Sat Sep 1 2001 16:48:26 by OEisl@VIE
Biz Boeing 777-200 posted Sat Aug 7 2004 21:28:41 by Boeing777300
SQ 777-200/200ER Registration posted Fri Apr 23 2004 04:19:28 by SQ452
Boeing 777-200 Freighter posted Thu Oct 9 2003 07:12:50 by Behramjee
Boeing 777-200 Best Seat posted Sat Sep 1 2001 16:48:26 by OEisl@VIE
Mystery VIP Boeing 777-200 posted Sun Feb 14 2010 22:59:31 by tomascubero
Future Of 777-200/-200ER? posted Mon Mar 5 2007 00:04:20 by AviationAddict
EK Boeing 777-200 posted Mon Apr 3 2006 15:55:43 by Metti
RG Introduces Boeing 777-200 To FRA posted Thu Oct 21 2004 15:56:28 by Hardiwv
Biz Boeing 777-200 posted Sat Aug 7 2004 21:28:41 by Boeing777300
SQ 777-200/200ER Registration posted Fri Apr 23 2004 04:19:28 by SQ452
Boeing 777-200 Freighter posted Thu Oct 9 2003 07:12:50 by Behramjee
Boeing 777-200 Best Seat posted Sat Sep 1 2001 16:48:26 by OEisl@VIE