Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Hawker Sidldey Trident  
User currently offlineDAKOTAsport From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 228 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1234 times:


Was this aircraft a good one?? How many sold and what airlines used them.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRw774477 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1070 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1194 times:

it sucked !

BA and CAAC were the major users

It loved Mother Earth hence its nickname 'Gripper'  Smile

rw774477


User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6453 posts, RR: 54
Reply 2, posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1166 times:

The Trident was a fine plane. It was fully nose to nose to the 727-100 of the same era. In several ways it was ahead of its time, for instance it was the plane which pioneered Cat III landings.
It suffered from the engine choise. It's RR Spey engines were always on the small side, and probably caused by the RR collapse and time consuming recovery following the RB-211 troubles the Speys were never uprated to cope with stretched Trident versions. So when the 727-200 became available with uprated P&W JT8D-15 and -17 engines, then the Trident was wiped out of the competition.
The Speys were also extremely noisy - even more noisy than the JD8Ds on the 727!!! But that was hardly an issue at that time.
The very latest versions - designated Trident 3B, I think - actually had a fourth engine on top of the #2 engine. It was some small engine which RR developed as a vertical lift engine for an alternative design to the Harrier VTOL fighter plane which was never built. It gave some 5000 lbs extra thrust during take-off only. It was shut down at 2000 feet or so.

First time I was on a BA Trident - from CPH to LHR - then shortly after take off the F/A delivered me one of the major London newspapers with a smile. The fat headline news on the front cover was: "Yesterday it happened again! A BA Trident suffered turbine blade failure on one of its RR engines and aborted take-off at Heathrow". I immediately remembered that never before had I been rolling so far for a take-off at CPH. My captain had read the news too!!!
I did feel slightly more comfortable going back the following day on a SAS DC-9. Anyway I enjoyed several more flights on the Trident during the following years.
I think that it all proves that those Spey engines were simply pushed too hard to push the Trident.

It was a great plane. It deserved to have been fitted with JT8D engines. Nothing wrong with RR engines, however, neither new nor old ones. But exactly when the Trident needed improved and uprated engines, then RR was in a financial coma and could not deliver. P&W could, and that made the 727 a winner in a time frame when technological advances in aviation went much faster than today.

The BA Tridents were configured with backward facing seats on row #1. Therefore I always asked for row #2. That way it was easy to enjoy a pleasant conversation with fellow pax on #1 row, making the flight seem shorter.

Best regards, Preben Norholm



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 34
Reply 3, posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1162 times:

They are one of the most important aircraft in the UK, they are used in most British Airports for Fire Training.

EGGD


User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7780 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1160 times:

Besides the underpowered engines the Tridents wing suffered from cracking. Later fixes to reinforce the wings resulted in fuel burn problems. Which most certainly forced its early retirement. The main problem with the Trident was that it was built to BEA's specifications, which was slightly smaller than the 727-100. Had the original plan gone through the plane would have likely been successful, at least in Europe. It was the first plane certified to do CAT III autolands and had some other innovative features.


Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Hawker Sidldey Trident posted Thu Mar 15 2001 17:52:13 by DAKOTAsport
Hawker Siddeley Trident posted Wed May 31 2000 02:58:15 by Trintocan
Hawker Siddeley Trident posted Tue Dec 28 1999 21:34:30 by Starship
NetJet Bechjets (Hawker 400XP) - Since When?! posted Sun Jul 30 2006 02:53:52 by Maiznblu_757
Hawker Hunter Crashes Into Homes During Oregon Airshow posted Mon Jul 17 2006 02:17:05 by Seachaz
Trident At Freetown? posted Fri Jul 7 2006 15:09:31 by Musang
HS Trident 4th Engine? posted Tue Feb 21 2006 02:05:16 by Boeing744
Hawker Declares Emergency At DAL posted Sat Jan 7 2006 19:56:33 by Texan
BA Trident Seating Configurations posted Sun Jul 17 2005 14:42:11 by Orion737
LHR's Trident Planned To Move 16/07/05 @ 2300 posted Fri Jul 8 2005 22:33:01 by Leezyjet