Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
764ER Looks Great  
User currently offlineWingman From Seychelles, joined May 1999, 2341 posts, RR: 5
Posted (15 years 4 months 18 hours ago) and read 1107 times:

Check out the story on the Boeing website. It's front cover. I think the plane looks awesome, without that hanging ass look of the 763. The interior is a replica of the 777 on a smaller scale and also looks great.

I hope to see it soon and take a ride. This plane has taken me across more oceans than any other. It inspires confidence, and the new one actually looks attractive. Here's to continued success for a truly great line of aircraft.

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDw From South Korea, joined Nov 2012, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (15 years 4 months 16 hours ago) and read 894 times:

The updated interior looks fantastic! And for once Boeing is showing off economy class seats that look like you actually WANT to sit in them! (The economy seats they used in the 777-mockups looked extremely bare, unpadded, and uncomfortable.)

User currently offlineKIX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 4 months 12 hours ago) and read 873 times:

The photo of the interior looks like something out of 2001: A Space Odyssey. Am I the only one? Was it coincidental?

User currently offlineNavion From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1015 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (15 years 4 months 6 hours ago) and read 846 times:

I agree with the good looks comment. You can see the difference in the main landing gear modifications to give proper clearance and better ground/wheel loading. The extra length actually makes it look kind of skinny!! I really think it looks good and I can't wait to see it fly.

User currently offlineAirbus Boy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (15 years 4 months 4 hours ago) and read 838 times:

It does look good but the wing tips are funny and in 1st class there is a a seat in the middle with aisle on both sides I thought that was funny. But I suppose for $120,000,000 what can you expect.

User currently offlineGoA340 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (15 years 4 months 3 hours ago) and read 835 times:

I liked the B767-400ER very much. When flying Business, I would still prefer the B777 but when flying Coach I think the new 767 is a lot better with 87% of the seats on an aisle or window. The interior structure of the 777 was replicated pretty nicely but I think the new material of the overhead bins (I think pretty much the same as in the 737NG) feels weaker and more "breakable" compared to the old material.

DL being my favourite US carrier, I will hopefully get to fly this new machine sooner than I think. Nevertheless I still beleive the -400 will have a tough time to compete with the A330-200 whose orders are soaring constantly.

User currently offlineDeltaAir From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1094 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (15 years 4 months 1 hour ago) and read 826 times:

In Mid March or April Delta 767-400ER flights will commense between MCO and ATL for crew training. All new aircraft go through here for training.

User currently offlineWilliam From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1352 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 804 times:

I wish they would have finished the job and made it fly by wire.

User currently offlineAsqx From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 619 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 799 times:

Why do yo NEED a FBW system in a 767 or any other commercial jet liner for that matter? Other that weight saving, there is not much need in an inherently stable plane. FBW was designed for military fighters that are instable and require hundreds if not thousands of controls a second to maintain controlable flight. So, please, give me a good reason any commercial airliners needs a FBW other than to save weight or impress the media and passengers?


User currently offlineUnited946 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 806 times:

Do you realize how much that would have cost? If a jetliner is going to be FBW, you have to start that way, like they did with the 777. You can't just change from hydraulic to FBW on an existing design. At least not at a reasonable price.


User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 801 times:

Has anyone other than me noticed that the 767-400ER windows (passenger) are --oval-- such as the 777's versus being --squared off-- like every other 767?


User currently offlineNavion From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1015 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 779 times:

The 767-400 uses a bunch of the 777 improvements including the windows (cost less in manufacturing and weighs less), landing gear similarities, interior and other systems. It's quite a bird.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
This CA Livery Looks Great posted Fri Sep 16 2005 00:36:59 by Chinaeastern
NWA New Paint Looks Great In First Real Pic posted Sat Mar 29 2003 01:19:05 by TrnsWrld
Swiss Airlines Livery Looks Great! posted Fri Feb 1 2002 10:24:30 by Gunfighter 6
QuantasLink B717 Looks Great posted Sun Jul 15 2001 23:35:39 by Travatl
The CRJ700 Looks GREAT,beautiful Plane! posted Mon Sep 25 2000 11:54:44 by Montenegro
764ER Looks Great posted Fri Aug 27 1999 04:33:19 by Wingman
Great Photo- Almost Looks Fake! posted Wed Dec 17 2003 05:50:34 by Maiznblu_757
Why Are Great Lakes And Cape Air Unique? posted Thu Jun 25 2009 00:40:07 by Tharanga
Looks Like The A340 May Be Obsolete posted Wed Jun 24 2009 06:07:31 by Jetfuel
Now This Looks Like A Real Airline! posted Thu Jun 18 2009 14:46:29 by Shankly