Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
TW STL-Japan Route Authority  
User currently offlineNRA-3B From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 170 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 7 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1691 times:

I seem to recall that TWA received route authority from STL to Japan (NRT or KIX?) a couple of years ago. They did not institute service at that time. Does this route authority still exist? If it is still good, would it make any sense for AA to take it up and beef up their service to the Far East? My memory may be faulty, but could any one out there help me out on this? Thanks.


5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 7 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1662 times:

It still exists and it would be transferable to AA if they wanted to start service.

User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7875 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (14 years 7 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1656 times:

If indeed this route authority would be able to transfer to AA after the merger, could AA then use that authority from any gateway they want? Seeing as they serve Tokyo from DFW, SJC, SEA, and ORD (I don't think I am missing any other ones) I'd imagine there would be other gateways besides St. Louis that they'd like to use it from... say LAX or JFK.

Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 7 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1646 times:

Nope, its an STL route authority and would have to be used in conjunction with the TWA, LLC operating certificate. Once an actual operation is in place, AA can apply for the DOT to transfer the route over to AA and to change the gateway. Alternatively, AA can just apply for additional route authorities in the US-Japan market and use the SURRENDER of the STL-NRT routes as a case for awarding it to them.

User currently offlineRedraider From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 531 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (14 years 7 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1635 times:

TWA never used STL-NRT because they didn't have slots at the time. They did still use 747's if I remember correctly, but I don't know if they had planned on using those on the routes.

Coincidentally, AA has authority to fly to NRT from BOS and JFK, but has not started service due to lack of slot availability at NRT.

My wife can't wrestle, but you should see her box.
User currently offlineMah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 34006 posts, RR: 70
Reply 5, posted (14 years 7 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1616 times:

AA is better off moving the service to a hub (did anyone say MIA?). I really don't think AA will care much about STL after the merger.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
China Route Authority Decision Overdue? posted Wed Jan 3 2007 19:15:39 by Mattnrsa
And The Route Authority Goes To..... posted Mon Dec 4 2006 04:55:14 by Style
2007 China Route Authority? posted Fri Dec 1 2006 17:18:20 by Globaldude
Route Authority (US Airlines) posted Sun Oct 1 2006 23:33:48 by Lincoln
UA Gets ORD-CUN Route Authority posted Wed Apr 26 2006 17:03:46 by MAH4546
LAX-MEX Route Authority posted Thu Apr 21 2005 19:46:24 by Aacun
Eastern's MSY-CUN Route Authority posted Thu Jan 20 2005 07:43:41 by MSYtristar
Where To Find Bilateral Agreement/Route Authority posted Sun Mar 7 2004 21:36:30 by Rjpieces
TWA's International Route Authority posted Sun Mar 18 2001 16:33:16 by Matsumoto
1994 Runway Collision Of TW MD80 And Twin In STL posted Tue Mar 2 2004 02:59:27 by TrnsWrld