Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US A321 At PHL (a Question)  
User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 52
Posted (13 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2445 times:

Hi all,

Last night upon my return from FLL, I noticed that in the A (International) terminal at PHL, there was a US A321 there in a gate that is a transatlantic gate...obviously the A321's do not fly transatlantic routes...why was it there...a few weeks ago when my mom went to pick up my grandparents at PHL, they flew into PHL on an A321 and it came into the same gate in the A terminal I was referring to...my mom said that the flight was going to FRA...which is clearly BS...so whats the deal??

Greg


Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePHLFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 851 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2418 times:

On 28FEB, my family and I flew to SFO from PHL on a US A319. I was surprised when we were told that we would be leaving from Terminal A. We left out of one of the Intl. gates too. My guess is that US is need of more gate space. They also have been using 2 or 3 gates in Terminal D.

User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2395 times:

It isn't gate space as much as the fact that it is probably flying an international flight next. Terminal A isn't just TransAtlantic. You can commonly see flights going there to Nassau, Aruba, etc.

They have gates. Half the time they aren't even used.


User currently offlineUSflt1778 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 269 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2385 times:

Actually they are using Terminal A gates since they do not have sufficient gate space at other terminals. Sometimes - but not always - they a/c have arrived from or are heading to an intl destination but this isn't always the case.

As far as unused gates, that's a bit misleading. Yes, there are times when many gates are empty, but due to the scheduled flight banks there are times when all gates in B & C as well as D2 & D4 are in use or in some other way accounted for. Terminal A gates are leased by the city to airlines on an as needed basis so they are utilized. There is also a full complement of US gate staff on hand in Terminal A to work trans-Atlantic services; before & after the intl. bank they are simply re-deployed to work whatever else is dropped on the gate.

One last thing...many of the gates cannot handle specific a/c types. The close-in gates on B & C are not going to handle a 757 or A321, for example. As the US fleet grows beyond their old DC9 & 737 workhorses there are logistical problems to be worked out.


User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4528 posts, RR: 34
Reply 4, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2362 times:

Speaking of PHL and parking, how is the airport going to expand domestic gate space? US indeed is crammed at PHL at bank times (I've been there several times in the past couple of years).

Once the new commuter terminal is opened north of Terminal E, it seems to me that the regional a/c parking in the triangular corner space formed by runways 9L/27R and 1/19, and the D/E concourses, could be used. Either D or E concourses could be extended for about 10 gates.

It's too bad PHL can't build a midfield terminal like DTW. PHL one of the worst-laid out airports around, and its prosperity will make the situation worse. The moving walkway between C and D concourses helps, at least.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineWatewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2353 times:

At least it's got a decent 'mall area' and brightly lit food court. Can't beat that.

User currently offlineUSflt1778 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 269 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2335 times:

PHL is an old airport, no doubt. The layout is fine for O&D traffic (as it was originally intended to handle in the 1960s) but not easy for connecting traffic.

US' growth during the 1990s was not something anyone anticipated and now the airport and airlines are trying to play "catch up" to keep on top of things. Geez, just 10 years ago they gave up Terminal A to American since they had no international flights for their "International" terminal!

I have seen plans in the PHL media about extending the D & E concourses with "hammerheads" like B & C currently have. That would add numerous gates to each concourse. I cannot recall any firm commitment and/or timeframe, though.

Parking has grown into a real problem during the past 2 years. Garages are full by 9am on Monday mornings and I have recently been turned away from the remote lot on 2 different Saturday mornings as they were full. Even off-site lots are 100% full at a cost of $13+ a day.


User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 52
Reply 7, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2322 times:

The aircraft was parked at the gate that usually the LH A340 takes...there were plenty of empty gates though...although I dunno how long it was there for before I saw it (which was 11:45 PM)...as for international flights the A321 doesnt do any for US and the US International within North America gates are scattered throughout the 4 US terminals (A,B,C,part of D)

The new international terminal should turn the current Terminal A into more US domestic gates... also I dont think the 321 can pull into interior gates...it has to stay on the far ends of the terminals for wingspan reasons (just like 757's)...

On another interesting note, going into PHL for my departure to FLL, I saw not 1, not 2, but 3 A330's parked near Terminal A with stairs up to them...unfortunately all the construction prevented me from seeing anything else...

Thanks,
Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2300 times:

The current expansion is going like this:

-13 gates for the new international terminal
-38 gates for the commuter terminal
-4 extra gates added to 'D' in a hammerhead.

I do not know what they mean by commuter. It could mean as big as CRJ, F100, or 717. Anyone know?

BTW: My Dad said that they are thinking of using up some empty tarmac spaces for jets and having People movers for them. Can anybody confirm this?


User currently offlineUsflt1778 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 269 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2287 times:

1) I think by US' definition (and they will be the sole user of Terminal F - the commuter terminal), it will be the current US Express fleet. This includes props as well as the RJs. Don't expect to see F100-types over there as they fly mainline ops.

2) They already use people movers in PHL, which is why they are building the new terminals. Currently US Express pax are bussed out to the field beyond Terminal E from either gates B12 or C16. The trans-Atlantic flights use traditional people mover rigs to and from a/c that are parked south of Terminal A and the old TW hangar. Although you'll see US using the people movers most often, LH and BA take turns with them too. There's just not enough space at Terminal A so they rotate remote parking among all the international flights. Believe me, this is one of the biggest sources of complaint from pax, airlines and employees! Many pax are "sold" on PHL as being an uncrowded point of entry to the USA, only to wait for a people mover after an 8+ hour flight.

For further expansion there's still space over by the old Overseas Terminal, where you'll occasionally see jets parked. Maybe they'll make better use of that area someday, even though it's too far to realistically connect without a more sophisticated transport system (eg, train or monorail).


User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2283 times:

No, my dad was talking about using them for the other airlines, like United or AirTran. Not just the int'l flights.

User currently offlinePHLFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 851 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2279 times:

I do not think they will convert any current Intl gates in Terminal A to domestic. From what I have heard, they will need all of the new gates plus the current ones. The situation may have changed, but a year ago, they had several other Intl carriers that were waiting to start service, but could not due to gate shortage at optimal times.

User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6826 posts, RR: 32
Reply 12, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2267 times:

I'll add (though I've never flown through PHL) that there are a lot of airports that use international gates for domestic flights when they're not needed for use by planes on international flights.

Northwest operates in Boston out of Terminal E, which is the international building, and in Houston, I've arrived several times at Terminal D (formerly Terminal IAB) on domestic flights. Same for Miami - most of AA's gates there can be used for international or domestic arrivals (doesn't matter much for departures).


User currently offlinePHL-777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2253 times:

Are you sure it wasn't a 330? USAIRWAYS Flight 28 is a continuation of flight 78 from SFO-PHL. Flight 28 is PHL-CDG.

User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 52
Reply 14, posted (13 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2251 times:

It was an A321...trust me...my mom also saw the same thing too a few weeks ago...

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What If Pan Am Took Over US Operations At PHL posted Wed Dec 29 2004 16:58:07 by Jet1977
US Airways At PHL-All Leisure Flights From B-end? posted Thu Dec 16 2004 18:15:18 by SHUPirate1
US E170 At PIT Question posted Fri Mar 12 2004 22:18:52 by KingGeo3
US Expansion At PHL If UA Merger Goes Through posted Sat Jul 8 2000 03:51:43 by Lowfareair
Spotting At PHL Question posted Sun Nov 21 1999 06:43:49 by US Airways
Change In Store For US At PHL? posted Fri Jun 23 2006 05:44:16 by HPRamper
Us Airways Envoy Experience At PHL posted Sun Jun 4 2006 07:03:12 by Boeing 747-311
US Airways Now Using LSG Skychef At PHL? posted Sun Apr 23 2006 19:46:07 by PHLJJS
Q400 A Solution For US At PHL? posted Wed Sep 7 2005 02:39:59 by Jdwfloyd
If US Goes Down What Happens At PHL? posted Thu Oct 28 2004 19:35:21 by Nygfan84