FLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4508 posts, RR: 4 Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1291 times:
Here's what I thought from the models:
RJ, Fokker, and MD-80 parking up front and on the 'triangle' leading to the second part of the main concourse. Widebodies will be able to pull up at almost any of the second part main concourse gates, and International will be in the third concourse with 'switchable gates' between international and domestic..
Kaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 11362 posts, RR: 40 Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1285 times:
Whatever about the configuration, I'm sure it will be as spotter/enthusiast-unfriendly as the rest of JFK. Do they, he asks naively, have any plans for somehwere, even internally, to take photos and just watch the aircraft?
Doug From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 814 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1267 times:
Twa747100 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 600 posts, RR: 0 Reply 5, posted (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1262 times:
I SAY DANG!!! THATS BIGGER THEN TWA AT STL, GO AA!
Varsity From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 171 posts, RR: 0 Reply 6, posted (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1254 times:
Actually, you can see pretty well from the upper level of the new Terminal One, and there is seating there. If you can get past security at Terminal Two, which depends on the mood of the security person, the view is good there too. I've taken lots of pictures there.
If you have a zoom lens and tripod go to the top of the parking deck(s) in the centre of the terminal circle. I wish that I had a zoom lens while Pan Am was at terminal six. I have some nice (but miniature) pictures of widebody clippers at the gates there.
NYC Int'l From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 7, posted (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1247 times:
Here is the website for the new "JFK International Air Terminal" (Terminal 4) group (Schiphol USA, LCOR Inc., & Lehman Brothers). It has alot of good information but the gallery stinks.
Dfw-man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 215 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1244 times:
the terminal looks pretty good i still do not know that american can justify needing a terminal that big but i guess they know alot more than i.i think that the AA terminal in miami will be much more impressive than the jfk terminal ,heck it might be better than the ord,dfw terminal facilities,from what i hear the one in miami for AA will have 61 gates in a mile and a half linear concourse,with 29 AA eagle parking space adjacent to it
NYC Int'l From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 9, posted (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1245 times:
What you posted has absolutly nothing to do with my question of what might be located where in the new AA terminal at JFK. I did not ask anything about ORD, DFW, how they stack up against one another or anything esle. Please restrain from posting for the sake of posting.
Dfw-man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 215 posts, RR: 0 Reply 10, posted (12 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1235 times:
Dfw-man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 215 posts, RR: 0 Reply 11, posted (12 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1239 times:
first of all lance i can't count the number of times that a topic was started and by the time all the replies were in it had turned to a complete different subject,i have an opinion to which i am entitled to and i voiced my opinion,just as anyone on the forum has and always does,so stop trying to be the forum police and let people say whats on there mind!!
Sponsor Message: 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4508 posts, 
From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 11362 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
