Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Q400 And CRJ700 In Fleet  
User currently offlineLV-7772 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1354 times:

Going over Bombardier's website I've noticed that Horizon Air has ordered both the Q400 and CRJ700. They both have the same capacity. My question is, what's the advantage for Horizon to have these two aircraft? How did they come to the conclusion of having 70 seater turbo prop and a 70 seater jet?


3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (15 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1330 times:

I believe on routes under 400 miles, the turboprop becomes more economical. Under 250 miles, it becomes incredibly more economical.

I believe Horizon has considerable routes that around the 250-400 miles threshold.

The 700 will also replace the F28's so pax used to having jets will continue to do so.

User currently offlineDash8tech From Hong Kong, joined Jul 1999, 732 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (15 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1321 times:

Wahoo! I can answer that.

The Q400 is basically going to be used on the shuttle routes that need extra seats for high demand. IE: PDX-SEA, SEA-YVR, SEA/PDX-GEG, BOI etc. The Seattle shuttle flights are our big money maker and the F-28 gets horrible gas mileage. So, yes essentially the 250 mile range.

The CRJ (IF THEY EVER GET HERE!!!!!!!!) will be used on the existing jet routes, Montana, So. Cal, Mid-Cal, etc.

As for the 37 seat Q200's they'll continue on with the smaller airport feeder routs and I'm sure do some shuttle duty.


User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (15 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1317 times:

on short legs turboprops much more cost efficient. also on 100-250 nm legs there is no big block time difference.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Planes Coming And Going In A Fleet posted Mon Apr 22 2002 15:29:56 by Godbless
Alitalia And Their Longhaul Fleet In The Future? posted Fri Aug 19 2005 13:14:15 by JMJAirways
A330 And 777 In The Same Fleet. Why? posted Sat May 12 2001 04:27:10 by Airpearl
Etihad Airways And Its Cargo Fleet posted Sun Dec 10 2006 05:06:32 by Werkur767
Aircraft And Airports In Films posted Thu Dec 7 2006 11:06:21 by SapphireLHR
Thai And SAS In New Strategic Partnership posted Wed Nov 29 2006 20:57:44 by Mortyman
US Airways And Their Int'l Fleet posted Wed Nov 29 2006 06:57:51 by Crownvic
Rumor: EK To IAH And YYZ In 2007? posted Mon Nov 27 2006 03:50:40 by Triley1057
BOM-JFK And All In Between 1971 posted Sat Nov 11 2006 18:48:43 by Sammyk
The TSA's Test And Notes In Your Bag posted Sat Oct 28 2006 09:32:56 by FlyingTexan