Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
FYI: Last Year KIX Sunk This Much...  
User currently offlineStratifier From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 957 times:

Kansai International Airport Co., Ltd., the company in charge of running KIX announced that on average, the airport sunk 22 centimetres during the year 2000.

Given that the sink continues at the present rate, it is predicted that KIX will stop sinking around the year 2044. It would've sunk between 12.2-15.5metres by then.

These are the PDF files they released in January - in Japanese and not viewable unless you have Japanese Acrobat reader;

http://www.kiac.co.jp/pr/pdf01/010131-1.pdf
http://www.kiac.co.jp/pr/pdf01/010131-2.pdf
http://www.kiac.co.jp/pr/pdf01/010131-3.pdf

What the company wants to say with these data, is that the sinking has been slowing down. The final, total level of sink is not expected to be greater than what they have originally predicted.

Let me take some data from the PDFs. It seems that the predictions were made at the beginning (before KIX opened Smile

Measurement point 17 (inside terminal)
Dec 99 - sunk 13.8m (predicted 13.7m);
Dec 00 - sunk 14.1m (predicted 13.8m);
Predicted to sink 14.1m by 2004, 14.5m by 2044.

Measurement point 9 (inside terminal, near runway side)
Dec 99 - sunk 12.3m (predicted 11.5m);
Dec 00 - sunk 12.5m (predicted 11.5m);
Predicted to sink 11.8m by 2004, 12.1m by 2044.

Measurement point 2 (one end of a runway)
Dec 99 - sunk 9.4m (predicted 9.8m);
Dec 00 - sunk 9.7m (predicted 9.9m);
Predicted to sink 10.0m by 2004, 10.2 m by 2044.

I tried to choose samples that sunk faster, slower and "on-schedule". These data really goes to show that sinking is uneven - different even for two runways that sit next to each other.

for our American readers: 1 foot = 0.305m; 1 inch = 2.54 cm.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStratifier From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 941 times:

Just let me clarify...

"Given that the sink continues at the present rate" isn't what I meant to say. The 12.2-12.5m average was the original prediction. the company thinks it will not be exceeded IF the sinking does follow the trend of slowing down.

Thanks for flying Strat News Agency :-P


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Does NW Really Hate Their Customers This Much? posted Sat Jun 16 2007 05:45:06 by Lincoln
United 2nd Most Profitable Company In US Last Year posted Mon Apr 16 2007 22:15:41 by Xbraniffone
Mexican Aviation '06. Our Last Year's Predictions posted Mon Dec 4 2006 22:46:26 by Fly727
Teheran Crash Last Year posted Mon Oct 30 2006 21:08:58 by B741
SJD; Is Cabo Going To Be Like CUN Last Year? posted Sat Sep 2 2006 00:52:33 by SLCUT2777
Continental Express LAX-Queretaro (last Year) posted Sat Jul 29 2006 01:02:31 by Simairlinenet
Farnborough? Not As Fun As Last Year? posted Sun Jun 18 2006 02:06:27 by Okelleynyc
Rumor: Did A380 Ever Come To Hong Kong Last Year? posted Fri Nov 25 2005 16:41:58 by CaptainTim
Any News On The Pinnacle CRJ 200 Crash From Last Year? posted Fri Oct 21 2005 02:57:27 by Nwafflyer
Uairq S-1 Filing: God Didn't Have This Much To Say posted Thu Jun 30 2005 00:37:38 by SHUPirate1