Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Old STOL Runway At ORD?  
User currently offlineN9JIG From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 21 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4550 times:

In perusing GoogleMaps Satellite photos of ORD I found at the north end of the old 18/36 (Now taxiway WT) a scrubbed out "STOL" painting where the runway designators would have been. You can still see the "18" not fully removed just south of this.

See http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=4...447&spn=0.001662,0.004053&t=h&z=19 for what I mean.

I know this runway was removed from service years ago, but was it then used for helicopters afterwords?

It is possible that this has been obliterated by the new construction at ORD since the aerial photo was shot...

In addition, there are dozens of angled scraps along this asphalt former runway entire length. Any idea what these are? They appear to be mostly about 10 to 15 feet long and are most prevalent south of 22R/4L.

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23304 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (6 years 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4207 times:



Quoting N9JIG (Thread starter):
I know this runway was removed from service years ago, but was it then used for helicopters afterwords?

Not as far as I know; there's not very much helicopter activity at ORD.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineSphealey From United States of America, joined May 2005, 378 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4160 times:



Quoting N9JIG (Thread starter):
In addition, there are dozens of angled scraps along this asphalt former runway entire length. Any idea what these are? They appear to be mostly about 10 to 15 feet long and are most prevalent south of 22R/4L.

That sounds like parking/alert stands for military aircraft. Besides the Illinois ANG that used to be based at ORD, in the 1950s (maybe 60s as well) SAC aircraft were dispersed to multiple civilian airports during alerts to make it harder to hit all of them. Seems odd to send the bombers to stand alert in major cities that were themselves targets, but that is what they did.

sPh


User currently offlineAirfinair From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 667 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3909 times:

STOL = Short Take Off & Landing. Runway 18/36 was only about 5300' long. This runway was not officially decommisioned until around 2003 IIRC.

Not sure if 18/36 was ever used as a helicopter pad - the official pad is just north of the international terminal, just south of I-190.

As far as the scrapes, I'm not sure - but perhaps they were put there to increase drainage??



ORD,MDW,IND,ARB,AMS,AUS,ANQ,DTW,DEN,PHL,PIT,MIA,GPT,SAN,PHX,LAX,SFO,OAK,SEA,LAS,SLC,SMF,ATL,MEM,BOS,MHT,JFK,EWR,LGA,NASâ
User currently offlineMayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 10656 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3882 times:

Not sure what that is but don't forget that that entire northern tip of ORD was the USAF Reserve AFB at one time. The Illinois ANG was also there with KC-97's and then KC-135's. I was in the reserves there and we had C-130's. Alot of new buildings were built there in the late 70's and early 80's. I'm not sure when it actually got shut down but I know that Mayor Jane (Calamity Jane) Byrne tried several times to sut it down, to no avail. I think it finally took BRAC to do it, sometime in the late 80's or early 90's.


"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
User currently offlineNorthStarDC4M From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 3075 posts, RR: 36
Reply 5, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3826 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR



Quoting Mayor (Reply 4):
I think it finally took BRAC to do it, sometime in the late 80's or early 90's.

would of been the mid 90s... I have some pics i took from a trip in early 94 showing KC-135s at ORD still.

As far as 18 goes, could it of been designated STOL for obstacle avoidance?... I can't believe an active runway pointed at the main terminal area would of been allowed with normal operating guidelines?



Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
User currently offlineMayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 10656 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3738 times:

Could be. I was long gone by then. We were actually part of an airlift group, out of MKE.

I wonder when that runway was built, too. It looks to be right smack dab in the middle of the old AFB.


This explains what happened with the military units.....the reserve unit was deactivated in '95 and the ANG was moved to Scott AFB.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/ohare.htm

[Edited 2008-12-01 10:09:56]


"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
User currently offlineVikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10342 posts, RR: 26
Reply 7, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3713 times:



Quoting Sphealey (Reply 2):
That sounds like parking/alert stands for military aircraft. Besides the Illinois ANG that used to be based at ORD, in the 1950s (maybe 60s as well) SAC aircraft were dispersed to multiple civilian airports during alerts to make it harder to hit all of them. Seems odd to send the bombers to stand alert in major cities that were themselves targets, but that is what they did.

He's talking about marks that were on what used to be a runway, though (18-36), and is now a taxiway.

Quoting Airfinair (Reply 3):
STOL = Short Take Off & Landing. Runway 18/36 was only about 5300' long.

I don't think that is an STOL-length runway. Plenty of "normal" aircraft can take off and/or land on a 5300' runway. I've seen many business jets land at KBED's 5100' runway 5-23.

Quoting NorthStarDC4M (Reply 5):
I can't believe an active runway pointed at the main terminal area would of been allowed with normal operating guidelines?

Though I don't know for sure, I would have assumed that 18-36 was a unidirectional runway, similar to BOS's runway 14-32. So takeoffs only on 18, landings only on 36. Anyone know if that was true?



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6902 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3653 times:

Rwy 18-36 was one of the four original runways-- so no terminal at its south end then.

STOL runways are ordinarily 2500 ft or less, but maybe STOL takeoffs were allowed on 18 after the terminal was built and conventional takeoffs were outlawed.


User currently offlineAirfinair From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 667 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3634 times:

18/36 was one of the original runways, built in 1943. Here's a link to a great overview of ORD's history:

http://ohare.bensenville.lib.il.us/orchard.htm

Also from the article, a great photo!:

http://ohare.bensenville.lib.il.us/images/Douglas%20Field.jpg

It looks like the old Douglas plant is located on the current north cargo area, also where the ANC facilities were. Runway 18/36 is clearly visible, as is 4/22 (you can see the '22" painted on it), 9/27 & 14/32.

Man how things change.....



ORD,MDW,IND,ARB,AMS,AUS,ANQ,DTW,DEN,PHL,PIT,MIA,GPT,SAN,PHX,LAX,SFO,OAK,SEA,LAS,SLC,SMF,ATL,MEM,BOS,MHT,JFK,EWR,LGA,NASâ
User currently offlineMayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 10656 posts, RR: 14
Reply 10, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3603 times:

What amazes me is to see all the farmland around it, at that time. Today, the only remnants of that is the occasional forest preserve.


"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23304 posts, RR: 20
Reply 11, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3540 times:



Quoting Vikkyvik (Reply 7):
So takeoffs only on 18, landings only on 36. Anyone know if that was true?

You've got it reversed. Takeoffs were on 36 and landings on 18. I don't know any reason why they would have used it for 18 departures or 36 arrivals; there are (and were) plenty of other runway options.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineIsitsafenow From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4984 posts, RR: 23
Reply 12, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3523 times:

I know the runway was used as late as the late 80's. I was on an Air Whiskey(UAEX) F-27 that took off to the north one morning with a stiff wind from due north. There were Short 360's also using the runway that morning for departures.
safe



If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
User currently offlineVikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10342 posts, RR: 26
Reply 13, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3420 times:



Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 11):
You've got it reversed. Takeoffs were on 36 and landings on 18. I don't know any reason why they would have used it for 18 departures or 36 arrivals; there are (and were) plenty of other runway options.

Yes, indeed I did have it reversed.

Thanks.



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlineAirfinair From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 667 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3292 times:

I was daydreaming on the way home from work today, and was hoping someone could find out an answer to a question I had: I'm wondering if 18/36 was ever rebuilt or resurfaced after it opened in '43'

The article says, "The runways like the utility tunnels and drainage systems were also built under wartime restrictions. Lacking reinforcing rods, the contractor made the runways thicker than was customary for airports at that time in order to save steel. There were four runways of 5,500 feet each; all were 150 feet wide and had a base of stone 15 inches thick covered by a seven to ten inch layer of concrete..."

I'd be interested to know if the remnants of the runway today is the original runway, and if not, when was it built and to what specifications. Thanks.



ORD,MDW,IND,ARB,AMS,AUS,ANQ,DTW,DEN,PHL,PIT,MIA,GPT,SAN,PHX,LAX,SFO,OAK,SEA,LAS,SLC,SMF,ATL,MEM,BOS,MHT,JFK,EWR,LGA,NASâ
User currently offlineSkibum9 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1229 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (6 years 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3172 times:

You know what is funny about that google picture, if you scroll down to the southeast, over Robijson Woods, by Irving Park Rd, you will see two A319s that appear to be very very close. When you zoom in, you will see that it is the same Mexicana airplanes. Obviously, it is two pictures that were taken a fraction of a second apart and merged together. Either that, or Mexicana was doing some formation flying!


Tailwinds!!!
User currently offlineMayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 10656 posts, RR: 14
Reply 16, posted (6 years 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 2890 times:



Quoting Skibum9 (Reply 15):

I see what you mean. Of course, with the near misses that occur in that area, maybe it IS real!!

I'm sure it is two photos, merged together, but if they were taken a few seconds apart, why wouldn't the lead a/c be in a straight line from the other one as opposed to where it is?



"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Truck And Plane Collide At Ord posted Sat Oct 18 2008 10:25:35 by ComairGuyCVG
Did I See A Jet Airways Landing At ORD Today? posted Tue Oct 7 2008 15:01:45 by 22right
BA Aircraft Trouble At ORD? posted Sun Oct 5 2008 12:56:06 by Jetdoctor
Extended Runway 10/28 Opens At ORD posted Fri Sep 26 2008 13:57:38 by Rwessel
MX Minor Overrun At ORD posted Fri Jul 18 2008 19:24:41 by N6238P
BA744 At ORD T5 Early This Morning posted Mon Jul 7 2008 10:52:46 by 22right
777 Emergency Landing At ORD? posted Mon Jun 30 2008 10:37:58 by Planespotting
Open Slots At ORD posted Sat Jun 28 2008 17:38:16 by Jetdeltamsy
Transfer At ORD From Aer Lingus To UA posted Sat Jun 21 2008 08:19:37 by Ansett767
AA And UA Schedule Cuts At ORD posted Fri May 30 2008 17:39:17 by TWA1985