Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CO/NW Alliance  
User currently offlineRepublic From Canada, joined Dec 2012, 0 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1321 times:

Here is a really informative article concerning the effects so far of the alliance between CO and NW.

A couple of highlights:

Wings looks to be right around the corner;

CO is finding that, while the perception still exists that NW's service is not up to the CO standard, it is in fact not the case(as other threads have touched on recently)

Both are seeing strong benefits financially


Read on and please post your comments.



March 24, 2001, 10:43PM

Airline alliance's benefits taking off
Continental, Northwest find mutual profits after legalities resolved
By LAURA GOLDBERG
Copyright 2001 Houston Chronicle

At various times over the past two years, Continental and Northwest airlines lobbed public and not-so-public insults at each other. They battled in legal briefs and in front of a federal judge.

Despite the drama, an operating alliance between the two continued in the background, drawing thousands of extra passengers to each airline every day.

Continental took in an extra $134 million in revenues from the alliance last year, up from $97 million the year before.

Since January, when the legal issues were resolved and the alliance extended to run another 14 years through 2025, the two have been working to deepen the already profitable partnership and wring more benefits from it.

"What we've accomplished so far is really the fairly easy and low-hanging fruit of alliance activity," said David Grizzle, Continental's senior vice president of corporate development.

That includes selling seats on each others' flights and making frequent flier programs and airport lounge memberships reciprocal.

Now, the two are focusing on landing and maintaining joint corporate business accounts and looking for ways to save on costs.

"We've barely scratched the surface in terms of achieving synergies on the cost side of the business," Grizzle said.

They also are striving to eliminate any lingering negative feelings the airlines' employees may have about each other.

Executives from each carrier recently discussed sending the same messages to their employees emphasizing how beneficial the alliance is, said Douglas Birdsall, senior vice president for alliances at Eagan, Minn.-based Northwest.

An upcoming issue of Northwest's employee magazine will "herald all the work we've done with Continental and the new efforts," he said.

Such an effort probably wouldn't have flown before. As the alliance began, executives at Houston-based Continental questioned Northwest's customer service abilities, while rank-and-file employees also worried.

"Continental had built such a premier service reputation," Grizzle said. "Continental employees were concerned about that reputation being sullied by association with Northwest, especially at a time when it seemed that every other day you were reading about some Northwest customer service debacle."

And now? "Northwest has improved significantly, customer complaints are down, and both executives and other employees of Continental are optimistic that customer perception will catch up to service reality and there will be no reservations about the Northwest product," he said.

The airlines haven't done a marketing campaign to build awareness of the alliance among the general public, leaving one industry expert to question Continental's commitment to it.

"I think they have to be more aggressive in their cross-marketing, and I'm not sure Continental wants to be," said Helane Becker, an airline stock analyst with Buckingham Research Group in New York.

At times, it appears to her that Continental may want out the deal, Becker said.

But Continental, which says it is strongly committed to the alliance, and Northwest are touting the partnership in ways that have succeeded in drawing business, Grizzle said. That includes promotions to members of both frequent flier programs and appeals to corporate customers and travel agents.

The question of how KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which has its own tightly integrated alliance partnership with Northwest, will fit into the Northwest-Continental relationship has held up any co-branding efforts.

Wings, an umbrella alliance brand designed to include the three airlines and other potential partners, stalled because of the KLM question. The moniker is nonetheless used by some industry insiders to describe the three airlines.

If the matter isn't resolved soon, Northwest and Continental, without fanfare or an official launch, may simply start using the Wings name.

"We, in fact, have a Wings logo. It exists," Birdsall said. "Even though we haven't formally announced Wings, we are getting all the benefits."


Continental faced choice
Northwest and Continental were brought together in early 1998, when Continental faced a choice: be bought by and merged into Delta Air Lines or remain a stand-alone airline and form an operating alliance with Northwest.

Northwest, which also bought a controlling stake in Continental from an investor group, prevailed.

But the Justice Department sued the two, saying Northwest's ownership stake violated antitrust laws and would harm consumers by reducing competition in the industry.

The government never challenged the alliance, and when it kicked into gear at the end of 1998, Continental executives expressed concerns about Northwest's customer service.

Months later, Continental asked Northwest to sell it the Continental stock. Northwest refused, and as Justice lawyers readied the antitrust case for trial, Continental sided with the government against its partner.

After two days of courtroom testimony at the end of last year, the two airlines reached a settlement in which Northwest agreed to sell Continental most of the stock. The deal, which closed in January, also extended the alliance.

"It took a while to get some things implemented simply because of some of the uncertainty that was caused by the Justice Department position on the stock," Birdsall said.


New destinations open up
Because of the alliance, Continental passengers can reach new destinations by flying part of their trips on Northwest. Or they may take Northwest part of the way because the flight is more convenient or the price cheaper.

In 1999, an average of 1,731 passengers connected between the two airlines each day. Last year, it was up to 2,017, with the average now hitting about 2,500.

The two connect passengers across the vast majority of their domestic networks.

In the 12 airports, including Boston, Los Angeles and La Guardia in New York, where they don't, their gates are too far apart or the setups would confuse passengers.

By year's end, the number should drop to nine. For others, the airlines have started developing long-term plans to relocate gates where possible.

"Given the certainty of a longer-term relationship, one can look at more significant capital investment in order to accommodate that," Birdsall said.

Internationally, passengers connect through Tokyo to and from Northwest's Pacific route system, and to and from Latin America, where Continental is strong.

They don't work together in Europe, where Northwest partner KLM is the holdup. The alliance deal between Northwest and Continental also calls for Continental to work with KLM.

But Continental and KLM couldn't agree on how to structure a relationship. Discussions were put on hold because of talks among European airlines, including KLM, about various mergers or alliances. The picture there remains unsettled.

Continental, which has its own menu of European flights from its Newark, N.J., hub,has said other airlines need a European partner more than it does. But, Grizzle said, it would be useful to be able to connect passengers to places where Continental won't have nonstop service from Newark.

Northwest and Continental are in early stage discussions about initial steps that Continental and KLM could take to cooperate, such as linking frequent flier programs for travel across the North Atlantic, Birdsall said.

Popular destinations via Northwest for passengers flying Continental on their first leg have been Salt Lake City from Minneapolis and Taipei from Tokyo.

For those starting on Northwest, Continental flights to Latin America, as well those to New Orleans and Tampa, Fla., from Houston are popular.

The airlines have worked to provide passengers connecting between them consistency, changing some, but not all, of their policies to match the other's.

For example, Continental is adopting Northwest's procedures for handling lost tickets, while Northwest added restrictions to its rules on children traveling alone on overnight flights.

And Northwest is using Continental's procedures for handling customers during so-called irregularities, such as long weather delays.

Continental will copy Northwest's mobile "rebook hot line," a bank of phones that can be wheeled in as needed to cut down on long lines passengers may face when flights are canceled. The phones connect passengers to reservation agents, and the calls get priority.

Both carriers offer self-service check-in machines for those using electronic tickets, and passengers can select Northwest or Continental flights.

The carriers don't have immunity from antitrust laws, meaning they can only go so far in working together. For example, they can't jointly set fares or determine what routes to fly.


Fixing minor problems
Houston resident Regina Scruggs recently took her first Northwest-Continental trip.

She flew Continental to Memphis, Tenn., where Northwest has a hub. From there, she took Northwest to Jackson, Miss. While she could have flown Continental nonstop, this way let her earn more frequent flier miles, and she wanted to give Northwest a try.

In an e-mail interview, she described her trip as "basically OK, although there were a few minor bumps along the way."

Among them: getting to Memphis on her return trip and not being able to find the gate for her Continental flight on any monitor.

A Continental spokeswoman said Northwest is installing new flight monitor systems in Memphis so Continental flights can be listed.

Business travelers also are using the combined networks as the airlines have joint contracts with about 120 corporations. In some cases, the company already had a relationship with Continental or Northwest.

Corporations sign agreements, sometimes with more than one airline, for discounted ticket prices in return for doing a certain level of business on the carrier. Employees are steered to airlines under contract but may not be prohibited from flying others.

Indianapolis-based Thomson Multimedia, which makes consumer electronics products, signed a joint contract with Northwest and Continental in September 1999.

The company had worked with Northwest for the previous 10 years but dropped its travel contract with another airline after it signing the joint deal, said Cindy Heston, the company's manager for corporate travel worldwide.

Among the reasons she choose Continental/Northwest: The size of the discount and the joint deal let her cut down on administrative work otherwise required to deal with two separate contracts. She also liked the customer service benefits, such as reciprocal frequent flier miles and airport lounge access, afforded the 3,000 employees who fly under the contract.

Since the deal, Thomson has doubled its spending on Continental, she said. El Paso, across the border from Juarez, Mexico, where Thomson has five plants, is among the company's population Continental destinations.

Each airline has the potential to save as much annually as is gained in extra revenues, Grizzle said. But such big payoffs are much further down the road.

The carriers are just starting a review of which computer systems and related technology they are likely to need in five to 10 years that can be developed jointly. Hypothetically, that could be a new revenue accounting system.

Even as uncertainty surrounds the industry about potential mergers, Grizzle said the two airlines aren't holding back on alliance planning.

If the federal regulators approve a planned United-US Airways merger, Continental may attempt its own merger, perhaps with Delta Air Lines.

"We are moving ahead," Grizzle said. "There are no Northwest initiatives that we are deferring because of uncertainty about consolidation."




16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1203 times:

There is no doubt that this is a profitable alliance for both airlines and the tie-up generates an additional
$150-$200 million to each carrier's bottom line. Given
the threat of major consolidation, it would seem as
though both carriers would try to stick to this alliance.

Unfortunately, NW's service standards are not up to
those of Continental. NW's planes are older, it has a
contentious relationship with its mechanics and other
employees, service-wise, NW is crap. Continental is
riding a high tide at the moment. The link with NW is
economical. I can tell you that boarding a CO flight to
Miami at Newark recently, where the flight was shown
on the gate board as a NW code share flight. I heard
several people saying, "Gosh, I hope we're not flying
on a NW junk jet!"

ContinentalEWR


User currently offlineNwa747-400 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1337 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1176 times:

Well, I agree with the article that NW service reputation is not the service reality.NW is doing great things and has been for 2 years.ContinentalEWR, I think it is time you stop bashing NW as it seems that NW/CO are in it for the long haul.As far as calling NW "junkjets" how dare you call some of the best maintained aircraft in the industry by that name. I have seen 30 year old DC9s with interiors that are much better than a 5 year old 737.NW is a good airline and it's time you realized that. I hope you do.

User currently offlineA330_DTW From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 371 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1171 times:

That was a really good article. Thanks for sharing it, RC.

As for ContinentalEWR, I agree with Nwa747-400.

You also have some growing up to do. I don't know if it makes you feel somehow superior to other people who read these postings by bashing other airlines, or if you're just a miserable old queen. Build a bridge and get over it.


User currently offlineA330_DTW From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 371 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1166 times:

Hmmm...a practically brand-new 737-700 cancelled due to equipment failure....what a piece of junk!

Here is the latest information about the flight you selected. This information may change as the flight's status changes. The times listed are local to the airport under which they are listed..



Flight: 238 Sat 24-Mar-2001


Departs: Mexico City (MEX) Arrives: Newark (EWR)

Gate: 29 Gate: B66

Scheduled Time: 8:35 AM Scheduled Time: 2:16 PM

Estimated Time: ** Cancelled ** Estimated Time: ** Cancelled **
Status: Cancelled





User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1164 times:

I think you both need to grow up a little. COEWR, 6 years ago, CO had one of the most disjointed fleets in the industry-a mix of Poeple Express, New York Air, Frontier, Continental, Texas Air aircraft. Old junky
DC-9'S, and 737-100's and -200's. Now, CO has a clean, modern fleet. NW has begun the process of updating it's fleet. I'm seeing more new Airbuses in CLE, and less of the old 727's or DC-9's now, so you can tell the process is underway.

And A330-DTW, again, you're way too sensetive to people critisizing NW. NW has improved over the last few years, and, like CO back in 1995/96, you're suffering from the perception lagging behing the reality. Having said that, the contentious labor problems there are still a problem, and must be solved-by both sides. And you're making a big deal about a maintainence cancellation on a newer aircraft has no validity whatsoever. All planes are subject to mechanical problems, and you know that, so your long post about the 737-700 cancelling is just sour grapes and an attempt to make an issue where none exists. I'm sure some new A-320's or A-319's have cancelled because of MX as well. Planes break. Enough said.



User currently offlineA330_DTW From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 371 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1158 times:

I guess my attempt at sarcasm went over your head regarding the cancelled 737-700 out of MEX. My point was exactly how you phrased it: planes break.

It has nothing to do with an aircraft's age, fleet type, etc.

You also make it seem like Northwest is the ONLY airline in the entire world that is having labor problems, has had labor problems, will continue to have labor problems!

The news is filled with reports about UA, AA and DL all having labor problems! When NW's pilots went on strike a couple years ago, Clinton did not step in to stop them from striking. However, he did step in on another major airline and forced those pilots to work!

I wish people would realize that NW is not the only airline with labor problems and PR nightmares.


User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1151 times:

Jeez, lay off everyone. Yes, NW's service isn't as good as CO's. They are in the process of buiding up their fleet to a modern one. However, you don't have to jump all over ContinentalEWR. He never actually called NW planes junk jets. He said that he overheard someone calling a NW plane a junk jet.

User currently offlineA330_DTW From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 371 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1121 times:

He "just happens" to overhear a lot of passengers saying a lot of things.

User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1112 times:

330_DTW: I like how you mention the labor problem. Let me ask you this: Who is having labor troubles in the NW/CO alliance? Who isn't?

User currently offlineNtafly From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1108 times:

I couldn't agree more.

User currently offlineCOexERJ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1096 times:

A330_DTW,

Again, your foolishness is shown to everyone on the forum. Congrats for making a complete arse out of yourself once again!

Continental EWR,

Just ignore him, he makes negative comments about CO every chance he gets. (funny how he jumps all over you for quoting other passengers, but he can rag CO's fleet all he wants. If that's not the model of hypocrisy, I don't know what is!) Is it just me or do I smell a severe inferiority complex?

BTW, please read some of A330_DTW's posts, they are very entertaining! (sadly enough)

And congrats A330_DTW for NW being named "Top Ten Domestic Airline" ~ what a feat!

Peace,
COexERJ


User currently offlineNwa747-400 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1337 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1071 times:

it seems like CO and NW fans should stick together and support both products.

Both are good airlines and are offering reliable, clean, safe, professional transportation.

This alliance is for the long haul, so why can't we just get used to the idea and both support each other. I haven't flown CO much since they were the laughing stock of the industry while NW was one of the best. But, my recent experiences on CO have been just as good as NW.

So guys from now on CO fans should support NW and NW fans should support CO. Afterall, the two airlines combined do rival UA and AA in size (although with a much better overall product  Smile )



User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1073 times:

I've never flown NWA, so I can't really make judgement on their service. I now check fares on their site b/c I can get OnePass miles, but I still prefer CO because they fly nonstop from IAH, whereas I have to connect with NWA.

User currently offlineA330_DTW From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 371 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1052 times:

Um, I don't believe that my posting made me look like a fool, or that I made--how did you phrase it..an "arse"!?--of myself.

I just pointed out that NW is not the only airline having labor problems out there today in the world, let alone just here in the U.S.

I do not bash CO. I am probably one of their biggest supporters here at NW. When connecting pax ask what gate their CO flight is departing from, or if it is on time, most agents don't know how to access CO's system and they tell them to go to CO tkt counter to find out.

When CO OP members ask if we can find their OP number, most agents don't know how to look this up.

I take great pride in the NW/CO alliance and as I stated in one of my previous posts on this topic, my sarcasm seems to have gone over others' heads.

However, the facts speak for themselves...NW saved CO from a certain demise.

CO received more complaints than NW (3x as many, in fact) in the most recent DOT statistics. The point being, that both NW and CO still have some problems and neither airline is better than the other.


User currently offlineNwa346 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1045 times:

Yes, NWA does have labor problems right now, but its not all NWA's fault. My sister is a CSA at MSP and she said that the union immediately turned down the latest "secret" contract offer, many mechanics were very upset with the union because they didn't allow them to vote on it. The contract was supposed to make them upon the highest paid mechanics in the industry. Unfortunately, the AMFA has a bigger agenda on its hands. Apparently, they are playing hard ball with NWA and trying to get an outrageous contract, so that they can impress UA mechanics into joining the AMFA. Now for years (around 4 now) she's been telling me about how the mechanics have bashed the airline over contracts, but lately they have been blaming the union for not having a contract and probably won't even get the latest offer now, because of AMFA's overestimation.
I'm hearing that if the mechanics don't get close to the latest NWA offer, they will most likely drop the union.
As for the DC-9's.... I regularly fly them between MSP-FAR and based on there condition, I wouldn't even guess that plane would be almost 30 years old.


User currently offlineNwa747-400 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1337 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1044 times:

I had heard that from one of my NW friends too (about the contract being a really good deal but the union leaders not accepting it even though the union members probably would)



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CO, NW/DL, AA, UA When Will They Order Airbus? posted Sun Dec 14 2008 19:33:56 by Plairbus
CO Star Alliance Network Changes posted Mon Aug 11 2008 12:50:00 by PanAm747LHR
CO/Star Alliance: IAH? posted Sat Jun 21 2008 07:05:16 by Drerx7
CO Wants Alliance With BA And AA posted Sun Apr 27 2008 18:40:24 by Meta
Potential Of A CO/NW Merger? posted Sun Nov 25 2007 17:49:27 by CIDflyer
AA,UA,CO,NW Flights Diverting To Remote Airfields? posted Mon Oct 22 2007 07:13:22 by Tallguy14
Why Do CO, NW, DL, US Not Fly To More Cities in France? posted Wed Jun 13 2007 19:50:54 by LH506
CO/NW Codeshares? posted Thu Dec 7 2006 01:36:49 by Snn2003
Some CO/NW Load Requests.. I Really Appreciate It! posted Tue Apr 11 2006 17:14:00 by UN_B732
CO, NW, DL To Allow Joint Lounge Access posted Mon Nov 28 2005 15:34:09 by Trvlr