The difference between the logos isn't that big at all, and i assume that 90 percent of the people who see the new logo won't even sense a difference from the old one. They seriously need to change their corporate identity.
Fly-K From Germany, joined May 2000, 3164 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (6 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 16977 times:
Royal Air Maroc's inflight magazine (December edition) explained the changes. I think the new font is much nicer but the rest of the changes are too subtle. Actually I preferred the cream colored top of the fuselage. But it's OK, just a basic, classic livery.
Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been...
UK_Dispatcher From United Arab Emirates, joined Dec 2001, 2598 posts, RR: 29
Reply 9, posted (6 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 16861 times:
Quoting 777way (Reply 8): That star design is associated with unholy things and yet its on the flag of a muslim country.
Maybe people in Morocco aren't so small minded as to be 'offended' by anything that vaguely resembles the forbidden star. Fair play to them.
Looks like RAM did not want to move too far away from their existing logo. The font is certainly more modern but the logo on first glance is basically the same. I guess the aircraft will retain the same basic livery - one which I actually quite like.
LH4116 From Sweden, joined Aug 2007, 1719 posts, RR: 18
Reply 16, posted (6 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 16539 times:
Well just to make things clear
This is the flag of Morocco
This is a Satanist star
And this is the David Star
Clearly there's a big difference between the Morocco star and the satanist star. The Satanist star is pointing down. And the David star doesn't look similar to neither one of them.
So clearly there must have been some sort of misunderstanding.