Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why SR Resumed Flights As LX And AZ As AZ?  
User currently offlineF.pier From Italy, joined Aug 2000, 1531 posts, RR: 9
Posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2191 times:

When Swissair ceased operations a new airline took over the business, but it had to change IATA codes (LX instead of SR), brand (Swiss International Airlines instead of Swissair) and livery.
Alitalia ceased operations on jan the 12th, the next day a new airline began flight, but it has the same code (Alitalia), the same name (Alitalia), the same livery.
Is there a specific reason?

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineLXM83 From Switzerland, joined May 2005, 618 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2152 times:

Quoting F.pier (Thread starter):
but it had to change IATA codes (LX instead of SR)

Well, Crossair (LX) took over routes, aircraft and staff from bankrupt Swissair (SR). Crossair was later renamed Swiss International Air Lines but kept it's LX code.

The reason for not renaming Crossair to Swissair was to avoid any connection between the bankrupt Swissair and the renamed Crossair. It was feared creditors could try to block assets of the new company to cover their debts in the bankrupt Swissair.

Don't know why in the case of AZ it was done differently. Maybe because the losses of any creditors were not as high and not as unexpected?

User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5601 posts, RR: 32
Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2133 times:

Because AZ did not go officially bankrupt (although they in fact were) like SR did. They tricked something in Italy and the state took over the bad assets while the "new" company could begin without them.

User currently offlineME AVN FAN From Algeria, joined May 2002, 13937 posts, RR: 23
Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2120 times:

Quoting LXM83 (Reply 1):
why in the case of AZ it was done differently

Swissair went into "Nachlass-Stundung" (bankruptcy -- Chapter 11 -- but far stricter than the US solution) and so could not continue in business. In case of Alitalia, things were done which in 2002 were refused by both the banks and the federal government in Switzerland.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Are CO Flights To MSN And BNA So Expensive? posted Sun Jan 8 2006 21:37:21 by Nycfuturepilot
Why No Scheduled Flights Between BEY And SSH posted Sat Mar 13 2004 20:21:26 by Horus
Why No Direct Flights Between India And Australia? posted Fri Dec 5 2003 17:49:51 by DIJKKIJK
KUL Eyeing For LH, AF And AZ Flights posted Tue Oct 21 2003 04:02:03 by Odie
KL's, SK's, LH's And AZ's Flights To DEL And BOM posted Fri Sep 19 2003 19:20:04 by Pe@rson
UA And AS Planes At Boeing Field On 5/11 posted Sun May 11 2008 20:25:24 by RoseFlyer
Who's Gonna Take IB And AZ? posted Wed Oct 24 2007 00:47:37 by Beaucaire
DL And AZ Send ROM - TLV Pax Via ATL?!?@?!?@ posted Thu Oct 11 2007 07:47:07 by Amirs
Western Airlines And OKC-TUL. Why So Many Flights? posted Sun Oct 7 2007 15:56:48 by TWA1985
Why No Intercontinental Flights To And From SLC? posted Thu Jun 21 2007 03:01:39 by Impacto