Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing Are Cancelling The 747X  
User currently offlineCEDARJET From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8115 posts, RR: 54
Posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1385 times:

There it is, folks. The 747-400 is the last 747 to be produced by Boeing. They're going to concentrate on the transsonic airliner (picture on BBC news website). I can't help seeing this as the beginning of the end of their Commerical division - the 737 is in it's final variant, the 757-300 and 767-400 are trickling through (at best)... The transsonic thing will only have limited sales as long as Airbus aircraft (or other Boeing lines) have lower seat-per-mile costs (which is very likely considering their more economical speed). Very sad. How did they fall so far behind?


fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineThom@s From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 11953 posts, RR: 46
Reply 1, posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1358 times:

Too bad, I wanted to see the 747X.  Crying

Thom@s



"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"
User currently offlineCX flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6605 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1360 times:

I bet that shut a lot of people on this forum up. I tried to stay neutral but was often annoyed at the narrow-mindedness of some of the Boeing lovers.
I can't help but wish I could see some of your faces now.


User currently offlineGOT From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 1912 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1347 times:

Boeing is absolutely falling behind Airbus now. If the new Mach .95 aircraft won't be a total succes, Boeing will stand there with pretty old products and fall together with them. The only really new aircraft Boeing has is the 777. It's a nice aircraft but you must have more products to compete on the world market. As I see it, Boeing needs to come up with an aircraft on a totally new market. The Mach .95 aircraft is a good step but it will probably not be a succes if it isn't really fuel efficient.

GOT



Just like birdwatching - without having to be so damned quiet!
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9169 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1344 times:

Press Release by Boeing on 29/3:

On March 29, Boeing Commercial Airplanes announced that airline customers have indicated that, with continued improvements, the 747-400 family will satisfy the majority of their large airplane needs. Development of the Longer Range 747-400 will continue; the first airplane will be delivered to QANTAS in November 2002. Boeing is also studying additional improvements to the 747-400, and will protect its ability to develop a larger (747X) if and when customers indicate a need.


Can't call it a cancel I believe.  Smile Wait for JAL and UAL's interest.


User currently offlineJayDavis From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 2000 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1324 times:

I don't view this notice that Boeing is not going to proceed with the Boeing 747X as any indication that Airbus has "won the war". Boeing is just going in a different direction. I feel certain that Boeing will remain a very healthy competitor to Airbus in the coming years of commercial aircraft production. This isn't over by any stretch of the imagination.



User currently offlineDatamanA340 From South Korea, joined Dec 2000, 547 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1319 times:

Boeing's new concept doesn't look as a 'big one', because it carries less passenger than 777-300 and is only faster by mach 0.05. There won't be many passengers willing to pay more to reach 30 minutes faster on transpacific flight.

If Boeing want to get a joker, it must be supersonic with lower noise and longer range or BWB, believed to cost less for operate. The concept is like Viper compared to Porsche.


User currently offlineCX flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6605 posts, RR: 55
Reply 7, posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1308 times:

Estimates are a 2.5 hour faster flight time between somewhere like HKG and New York. That's not bad, although with such a small pax load, it would be interesting to see how low they can get operating costs. Cathay already don't like flying small (Anything less than 300 seats) long haul as the yields are too low. Having said that, they are one of the airlines on the design committee, so we shall see.

User currently offline777x From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1310 times:

DatamanA340,
This plane will cruise at .95, the highest cruiser currently is typicall at .84 (747 sometimes push .86 but not on transpacific long haul)



User currently offlineDatamanA340 From South Korea, joined Dec 2000, 547 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1299 times:

I know, but that Boeing says it flies in .95 or faster doesn't mean that it really flies so fast. That's entirely up to fuel consumption, Boeing makes.

User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1296 times:

First of all, the 747X is not cancelled. I would like to see the press release where Boeing has announced the outright cancellation of the 747X program. Whether we see the 747X fly is questionable, but I hate to see poeple say that the program is cancelled when it is still alive.

It seems to me that fuel comsumption data for the "sonic cruiser" is very near that of current aircraft because airlines wouldn't want it if it were a "gas hog". But I have read that interest for the "sonic cruiser" is very high. Some analysts have said, "if Boeing can make this aircraft work, you can write off Airbus right now". A bit of an exageration. However, I do believe that Airbus was a bit blindsided by this new aircraft announcement.


User currently offlineCX flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6605 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1292 times:

Actually, some of us have found that cruising at 0.86 in the 744 constantly, regardless of where you are going does not actually burn a lot more than flying at the speed which the flightplan tells us to. Many of our guys do it, but most don't either because they don't know this, or because they are too scared of questions from management, so they go by the book.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will Boeing Ever Launch The 747X posted Sat Mar 17 2001 02:47:44 by Madog
Cathay Says They Are Buying The New Boeing posted Sat Apr 7 2001 15:42:10 by Oxygen
Will Boeing Produce The B 747X? posted Thu Mar 29 2001 16:24:37 by United Airline
Has Boeing Launched The 747x? posted Fri Feb 16 2001 18:57:12 by Tg 747-300
Boeing- Pushing The 747X Harder Now? posted Thu Feb 1 2001 04:20:44 by CX747
Why Does Boeing Produce The 747X? posted Thu Dec 21 2000 09:09:41 by OO-VEG
Could Boeing Stop The 747X? posted Wed Nov 29 2000 15:40:53 by Rw
Boeing Remains Committed To The 747X Family posted Sun Oct 8 2000 14:55:40 by N503JB
What Are Boeing´s Plan(e)s For The Future? posted Thu Jan 20 2000 23:53:34 by Cgn
Why Are All The Shades Closed? posted Tue Aug 29 2006 21:43:46 by SK736