Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Aeromexico Latest Int'l News. Back On ATL-CUN 3X  
User currently offlineJuventus From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 2835 posts, RR: 2
Posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2958 times:

AM will be back on the ATL-CUN route, 3X this time around
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/090217/20090217006547.html?.v=1

-Looks like AM might actually bring back the Shangai route. Honestly I didn't think they were, but searched on Passrider.com, looks like its loaded. Anybody's got the latest.
http://mm.flightlookup.com:8000/?Fro...Hops=NONSTOP&button=Show+Schedules

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimeToFly From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 34 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2924 times:

Wonder when will AM ever fly back to ATL from MEX in order to connect passengers to partner DL's system. Actually when will AM also use SLC to feed DL's flights in the western hub? Never understood such little cooperation between both Skyteam members in DL's turf outside JFK....

User currently offlinePzurita1 From Greenland, joined Sep 2002, 1392 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2844 times:



Quoting TimeToFly (Reply 1):
Looks like AM might actually bring back the Shangai route.

What? I never know AM had stopped PVG. In fact, in their website they still have adds about this route: Shanghai, starting at US$1,190.

I will never understand AM



Next flight: IAH-DBX-MRU-ANT
User currently offlineJuventus From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 2835 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2826 times:



Quoting Pzurita1 (Reply 2):
What? I never know AM had stopped PVG. In fact, in their website they still have adds about this route: Shanghai, starting at US$1,190.

I will never understand AM

Yes sir, Aeromexico suspended Shangai for "90 days", they did this about a month ago. A couple of people here (I was one of them) though the "90 days" would eventually turn into a permanent suspension because of the economic crisis, but according to Passrider.com, the flight is schedule on 4/29/09 MEX-TI-PVG AM777.....keeping my fingers crossed it comes back

Quoting TimeToFly (Reply 1):
Wonder when will AM ever fly back to ATL from MEX in order to connect passengers to partner DL's system

Hum, I though they were flying ATL-MEX. Jeez, things always changing at good old AM, hard to keep track.


User currently offlineGhost77 From Mexico, joined Mar 2000, 5217 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2744 times:



Quoting Pzurita1 (Reply 2):
What? I never know AM had stopped PVG. In fact, in their website they still have adds about this route: Shanghai, starting at US$1,190.

Thanks to the INM, PVG will now become seasonal.

Quoting Pzurita1 (Reply 2):
I will never understand AM

Don't try! Never understand AM, just love her  Smile

g77



Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
User currently offlineJuventus From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 2835 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2661 times:



Quoting Ghost77 (Reply 4):
Thanks to the INM, PVG will now become seasonal.

Hum, the route is only 2X, and now "seasonal"??? oh man, Aeromexico's venture into China not going very good


User currently offlineNAVEGA From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 741 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2613 times:



Quoting Ghost77 (Reply 4):
Don't try! Never understand AM, just love her

Your know Ghost, as much as I love her, I am beginning to become concerned. It seems
as thought she is keeping her head above water and trying not to drown.

I do hope someone take the reigns and leads her out of the water soon.


User currently offlineAM744 From Mexico, joined Jun 2001, 1773 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2598 times:



Quoting Ghost77 (Reply 4):
Thanks to the INM

I'm assuming you are talking of the Instituto Nacional de Migración. If so, why are they interfering? IIRC there has always been a Visa requirement on both sides.


User currently offlineGhost77 From Mexico, joined Mar 2000, 5217 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2598 times:



Quoting Juventus (Reply 5):
Hum, the route is only 2X, and now "seasonal"??? oh man, Aeromexico's venture into China not going very good

The route has not yet ceased, they continue flying 2X but it's under studies of going seasonal anytime. Not for nothing AM adviced DGAC of possible changes on the route.

NAVEGA, many will flame me or have or do not agree with me, but not for nothing MX was bought first. OTOH, if they don't do the right things, AM might be our RG by 2013 once Volaris, Interjet, Viva, Mexicana, et al get more planes.

g77



Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
User currently offlineFly727 From Mexico, joined Jul 2003, 1789 posts, RR: 19
Reply 9, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2586 times:



Quoting Ghost77 (Reply 8):
NAVEGA, many will flame me or have or do not agree with me, but not for nothing MX was bought first. OTOH, if they don't do the right things, AM might be our RG by 2013 once Volaris, Interjet, Viva, Mexicana, et al get more planes.

Fact that MX was bought first came out as at the moment it was more viable (and financially stronger might I add). Now that both airlines are private the scenario is sort of different, yet pretty tight with fuel and costs sky-rocketing. My point is that, behind AM there is a very strong group of businessmen who, unlike many of us, take less passion on airplanes and focus a bit more on staying competitive and making money. Airlines is a business and they have invested in one. Hard to think they are wild-guessing their future and jeopardizing their dollars.

RM  Smile



There are no stupid questions... just stupid people!
User currently offlineJuventus From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 2835 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2580 times:



Quoting Ghost77 (Reply 8):
AM might be our RG by 2013 once Volaris, Interjet, Viva, Mexicana, et al get more planes

That's exactly what I've been thinking, what will happen when Volaris, Interjet and Viva mature and start flying to the US and maybe even Canada??.


User currently offlineGhost77 From Mexico, joined Mar 2000, 5217 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2494 times:



Quoting Fly727 (Reply 9):

Totally true, by then, MX and AM financial information was public and MX was stronger. Thanks to school and teacher's working at the audit companies for MX and AM, I've seen some stuff, more over I today talked to high people at Banamex at Reforma's hq's and they're worried and trying to do something! Also BX's is concerned on their fate as rumors are going stronger of being soon sold. I've seen balance sheets and they're in time to do something! Of course, they're not RG bringing mix of engines, fleet types, etc!

Quoting Juventus (Reply 10):
That's exactly what I've been thinking, what will happen when Volaris, Interjet and Viva mature and start flying to the US and maybe even Canada??.

What will be of MX too?? Once all those expand!!! Things will be tough... but ABOUT TIME!!!

Expand the market!!!

g77



Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
User currently offlineRojo From Spain, joined Sep 2000, 2443 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2467 times:



Quoting Fly727 (Reply 9):
My point is that, behind AM there is a very strong group of businessmen who, unlike many of us, take less passion on airplanes and focus a bit more on staying competitive and making money. Airlines is a business and they have invested in one. Hard to think they are wild-guessing their future and jeopardizing their dollars.

I would tend to disagree with your statement, because I was there when AM was bought. The strong group of business people (there are woman involved) did not have a clue what they were buying; it was actually one of the investors that convinced the others since they wanted AM for a very different reason... and indeed they have been wild-guessing AM's future. Some investors have also been asking the board for answers about the return on investment that was promised and still not fulfilled...


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Breaking News - Qantas Deal Back On! posted Sat May 5 2007 02:03:47 by Peh
Latest (good) News On The B747 posted Sun Oct 20 2002 14:48:01 by Na
ATL Is Back On Top! posted Fri Jul 12 2002 14:18:48 by RM-11
CX B744 Serivce Back On HKG-JNB posted Tue Dec 2 2008 08:51:29 by Warren747sp
Lady Back On G-VFAB posted Wed Sep 17 2008 07:45:39 by Speedmarque
US Airways Puts The 757 Back On Transcons posted Tue Jul 15 2008 15:14:45 by PanAm330
Honduran News Report on TACA 390 crash posted Fri Jul 4 2008 13:50:55 by Ludavid777
Future Of Int'l Carriers At Fortress ATL? posted Mon May 12 2008 13:48:07 by Delta763
DL And NW Pilot Union Talks Back On posted Wed Mar 5 2008 12:49:12 by Zone1
Visiting City Centre On ATL Layover posted Sun Jan 6 2008 17:50:52 by CPH757