Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UK DTI Shuns BA For Leaving KUL  
User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2937 posts, RR: 6
Posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1042 times:

A high profile British Trade and Industry delegation are in Kuala Lumpur in order to try and boost UK trade and investment in Malaysia. Following BA's decision to quite KL, a member of the delegation was quoted in the local press as saying that the UK government was not particularly happy with British Airways' decision to leave Kuala Lumpur but diplomatically pointed out that the UK government had little say in the matter.

He added that Malaysia Airlines should cease the opportunity to boost their services into the UK which I find rather amusing since MAS has been pushing for a third daily service into LHR for a few years now only to be blocked by the UK CAA.

The local British population in Malaysia are also said to be unhappy with BA's decision to leave as the British make up one of the largest expatriate communities and family members are now forced to fly via Singapore or fly Malaysian. (I guess it depends on the companies footing the bill whether or not they continue to fly BA via SIN or fly MAS now and families with young kids must find the transit a hassle)  Smile


2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBilly From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2000, 895 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (13 years 8 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 997 times:

I notice that BA are saying that they lost £14m/year in KL, that MAS fare-dumped, and that BA is now concentrating its regional hub in Singapore. SIN passengers are providing BA with a 40% higher yield.

I assume BA put this out to counter critiscism of late.


User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2937 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (13 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 969 times:

The purser on a flight in February said it was due to losses of £8 million a year - which although a loss is not really that great for a route in recovery from the economic recession in '97, for an airline like BA.

Anyway - perhaps this ought to be put to rest in peace.

Next time try KLM as they used to say.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New 'Low Cost' BA For UK Regions:'BA Red'? posted Wed Aug 17 2005 15:41:38 by Concorde001
Is BA Flying To KUL? posted Sun Jan 7 2007 14:17:50 by EMAlad
MIA Places Blame With BA For MIA Incident W/ Blair posted Thu Dec 28 2006 15:23:42 by Eksath
UK Government To Press For Airport Expansions posted Thu Dec 14 2006 10:43:31 by Zarniwoop
UK Space Program Dropped For Concorde posted Wed Nov 1 2006 22:56:07 by Leezyjet
Why Is AA Cheaper Than BA For The Same Flights? posted Thu Jul 20 2006 22:55:14 by Highpeaklad
UK Based Airline Proposed For LHR-India Routes posted Tue Mar 21 2006 01:43:58 by LAXDESI
Priceline In The UK - No More Bidding For Flights posted Tue Mar 8 2005 14:59:22 by Rwylie77
BA And AKL/KUL/MNL/TPE posted Thu Feb 24 2005 13:54:58 by United Airline
UK High Court: Plans For Additonal Runways Upheld posted Sat Feb 19 2005 07:28:59 by Scotron11