Pohakuloa From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 408 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (5 years 5 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2739 times:
I find it interesting in the article that both spokesman not only look at it as beneficial for their companies, but that they are the dominant member in this agreemant. Yeah, I commented on the newspaper site as well.
I am still wondering though, why WP would agree to this. It doesn't seem to me that this would benefit them at all. If it does benefit them, how would it (if anyone knows)?
The only thing I can think of is that maybe WP knows something we do not. I have a conspiracy theory roaming around in my mind and though far fetched, it would be the only reason I would agree to this.