Kaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12956 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (6 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3986 times:
Or maybe a franchise operation, like Loganair's relationship?
There was some talk of this some time ago; maybe there were talks, but they fell through. I think, personally - purely on the basis of their networks and aircraft types - that it would work well. WOW has been stuck with five Dash 8s for the last few years and BE has grown its business significantly and successfully; clearly not a lot of expanding going on there; can you really get the economies of scale, both in terms of number of aircraft and also numbers of seats on aircraft, that BE gets with its 78 seat Q400s? Doubtful, I'd say.
So, all things considered, I'd say there's scope for a relationship; perhaps BE could lease some of its Dash 8s to WOW, to replace their five Dash 8-300s and they could benefit from BE's maintenance and pilot training facilities?
8herveg From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 1343 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3977 times:
Quoting Kaitak (Reply 1): WOW has been stuck with five Dash 8s for the last few years
Have they really only got 5 aircraft? Thought they would have more than considering the amount of destinations they have.
They probably could merge completely, rather than as a franchise, as I am sure there are some routes which Flybe have which only need the 300 series, and some routes which WOW have which could use the slightly larger 400 series.
BMED From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 863 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (6 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 3907 times:
I would think that a franchise would work. That way flybe don't then get the cost of the business but still have the benefits. Also it means that Air Southwest keeps its independance. Thats one going thing about the Loganair agreement. Scottish people still feel that Loganair is the airline for Scotland rather than just a national carrier. I think that in these times it will be key for airlines to be working together. Would also allow more connection oppotunities for passengers as well.
Super737 From UK - Northern Ireland, joined Feb 2008, 105 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (6 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3794 times:
Personally, AIr Southwest offer Flybe no real benefits. If BE wanted to, they could wipe Air Southwest out no matter what anybody says.
The usual thing about mergers is, both companies have something to offer. Not this one, for flybe it would be a step backwards, older sub fleet, more training and a business plan much different to theirs.
Now with loganair, they do as their dominatrix (flybe) tells them to do. If loganair were still a BA b*tch would they now be operating BHD/IOM/BLK?
Flybehubby From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2008, 177 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3619 times:
Here's my (slightly opinionated) 2p worth.
Quoting Super737 (Reply 4): Personally, AIr Southwest offer FLYBE no real benefits. If BE wanted to, they could wipe Air Southwest out no matter what anybody says.
I'd tend to agree with this, simple reason would be economies of scale. Flybe have a very low cost base. Plus, if they could fill the aircraft, the revenues generated on the Q400 vs 300 could be greater......this obviously depends at what cost the seats we're sold at.
Im not aware of Air Southwests' (WOW) financial details but Flybe have had a good couple of years and i'm guessing would have more cash in the bank to should they decide to sell seats at below cost just to kill WOW off.
Quoting BMED (Reply 3): Thats one going thing about the Loganair agreement. Scottish people still feel that Loganair is the airline for Scotland rather than just a national carrier.
I agree entirely, the Scottish still like to buy from themselves.
Quoting Kaitak (Reply 1): So, all things considered, I'd say there's scope for a relationship; perhaps BE could lease some of its Dash 8s to WOW, to replace their five Dash 8-300s and they could benefit from BE's maintenance and pilot training facilities?
I doubt this would happen. The retirement of the BACON EMB145s means the Q400 fleet is doing more sectors than before and they still dont have the crew numbers Flybe are wanting per aircraft. This situation should be sorted by the end of this year. BTW im not saying that Flybe are short staffed on the Q400 fleet, before the rumour mill starts.
Quoting 8herveg (Thread starter): Although Air Southwest uses the slightly smaller Dash 8 300 series, both airlines offer a similar product to similar destinations.
Its hard to offer a much different product / routes when using a similar type of regional fleet. There's only so far a Dash can fly!
Quoting Super737 (Reply 4): The usual thing about mergers is, both companies have something to offer. Not this one, for FLYBE it would be a step backwards, older sub fleet
I agree, im not sure of when the WOW's fleet was delivered but being 300s they may have been produced before the advances in technology developed for the Q400 we're applied to the production lines of the 300. Im also led to believe that the cost difference between running the 300 and the Q400 is small so why not use the larger Q400 and try to sell the extra seats?
Nighthawk From UK - Scotland, joined Sep 2001, 5270 posts, RR: 31
Reply 6, posted (6 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3611 times:
And give FlyBE a virtual monopoly on domestic flying?
If anything WOW should be looking to merge with Eastern or Aer Arran, in order to provide greater competition to FlyBE on domestic flights. Sadly the fleets and business models dont really match between these airlines, making a merger difficult.
PlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11993 posts, RR: 59
Reply 7, posted (6 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3497 times:
I severely hope not, it would be a massive step backwards for the far South West's flight connections as BE are not committed to PLH, or NQY for that matter, as the Q400 is too big.
Quoting Super737 (Reply 4): If BE wanted to, they could wipe Air Southwest out no matter what anybody says
Well they tried and failed before; last year they manned an invasion of NQY which proved pretty thankless; pitiful load factors and surprise surprise, several routes never even got into the air and few have returned for a second season. They are having another stab with the influx of seats on the LGW route, but at the end of the day they can't get into PLH - their aircraft are just too big which gives WOW a major advantage and stronghold. Air Southwest aren't a fragile carrier who can be blown over in just one breath, a look at their recent response to BE illustrates that.
...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
Sickbocks From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2008, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (6 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3282 times:
Brymon used to do what Air Southwest do. Brymon - a happy place. BA gobbled-up Brymon, glued them together with BRAL and BA Regional and created BA Citiexpress subsequently rebranded to BA Connect. Cue ex-Brymon employees escaping low morale and helping to create Air Southwest - essentially Brymon 2.
BA Connect was then sold to flybe. Not sure the Air Southwest people would be too chuffed about being assimilated twice.
EXTspotter From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 992 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (6 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3168 times:
I would hate for them to merge. Flybe is very very expensive, so for them to take complete monopoly in this area would be awful for the economy, also with the cutting back of flying from Plymouth and Newquay could only be bad for tourism. If they did take over Plymouth would be dropped completely because the runway there isn't long enough for the Q400 so that any Q400 flights from there would have to take a hit on weights. Anyway, I don't think Sutton Harbour (the holding company for Air Southwest as well as who own most of Plymouth...) would sell it to Flybe as it is used to attract companies to use other companies in their group in the city. Even if it was making a loss, they would probably take the hit as the revenue through other companies in the group (i.e. the Airport and Port) would make up for the loss indirectly.
AF BE BY FR MV PD SZ U2 VZ DHC6, 8-3/4Q, 732/8, 763ER, A319, A380
Plymouth City Council would certainly object, for exactly those reasons - the airport and airline has been recognised as a vital economic link. Pissing off PCC is certainly not in the Sutton Harbor group's best interest, to say the least.
...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...