Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lufthansa & Airmalta Codeshare On MLA-MXP  
User currently offlineBBADXB From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (5 years 9 months 11 hours ago) and read 2323 times:

Lufthansa and Airmalta will be codesharing on Airmalta's Malta-Malpensa services as follows:

MLA-MXP KM626 as LH1683
MLA-MXP KM628 as LH1681

MXP-MLA KM627 as LH1682
MXP-MLA KM629 as LH1680

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSflaflight From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 1183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (5 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2058 times:

Excellent, this will keep solidifying LH's MXPs presence. I'll be honest with you, I was a little worried about LH's dedication to MXP now that AZ is contemplating reopening MXP routes, but looks like LH is serious about MXP.

User currently offlineBBADXB From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (5 years 8 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1925 times:

Having been a FF on LH for years, and having flown 3 (average [at best] to absolutely horrendous) AZ flights, AZ at MXP (or anywhere) is the least of LH's worries!

I think LH should be more concerned about being effectively shut out of Linate. It would be much better for them to offer their intra-European (non-Germany) flights out of LIN than MXP, as is happening at the moment.

U2 is more of a treat than AZ at MXP.

It's also quite interesting that KM/LH offer a connection to Spain (can't remember whether it was BCN or MAD) that involves the same travel time as the connection to the same destination in Spain via an LH hub in Germany (can't remember whether it was MUC or FRA).

Having been through MXP, MUC and FRA many times, I'd much rather travel via Germany than the virtual dump that is MXP.


User currently offlineWAC From United States of America, joined Nov 2008, 275 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 8 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1791 times:



Quoting BBADXB (Reply 2):
It would be much better for them to offer their intra-European (non-Germany) flights out of LIN than MXP, as is happening at the moment.

LIN is slot constrained and LH has a MOU to improve MXP, which has already got dedicated checkin- security lanes and gates, and in the next two years a brand new satellite....so MXP is improving, as I agree MXP was a mess as an airport for transiting. also since AZ left MXP has become a lot better. The probs at MXP was AZ, as is still the prob at LIN and FCO. SEA, the owner had invested a lot of money in the past 2-3 years to try and improve and move on from the horrendous start of MXP.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
EK & CO Codeshare On EWR-LGW? posted Thu Jun 12 2008 19:51:22 by DABTH747
Why Do Lufthansa & SQ End Star Codeshare NY-FRA? posted Wed Jan 28 2004 09:33:53 by KEESJE
Why Don't F9 & FL Codeshare? posted Sun Mar 8 2009 09:21:55 by Azstar
How Long Will BD Operate For LH On TXL/MXP? posted Thu Mar 5 2009 13:22:17 by TFFIP
Bmi Want To Codeshare On VS's LHR-BOS/MIA/SFO/LAX posted Wed Jan 28 2009 08:45:43 by Humberside
SQ Adds Codeshare On US IAH-PHX Flight posted Fri Jan 23 2009 18:00:42 by Thomasphoto60
Integration Of DL & NW's Flights On Websites posted Thu Jan 8 2009 12:53:14 by PanAm747
BA Codeshare On BE posted Tue Aug 19 2008 02:39:57 by Spud757
Bmi/ANZ To Codeshare On LHR-LAX posted Wed Feb 27 2008 13:56:35 by Humberside
US & CA Codeshare posted Sun Feb 24 2008 20:59:49 by BA744PHX