Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA Isn't The Only One With Super 80's  
User currently offlineFlyPIJets From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 875 posts, RR: 3
Posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 7934 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © The Douglas Aircraft Company (Jammy Lee)
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © The Douglas Aircraft Company (Jammy Lee)



Doesn't AA still call their MD-80's Super 80's?

When did M-D start calling the DC-9-80 the MD-80, anyway?


DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, F28, 717, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, IL-62, L-1011, MD-82/83, YS-11, DHC-8, PA-28-161, ERJ 135/145, E-1
24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNWADC9 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4896 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 7929 times:



Quoting FlyPIJets (Thread starter):
When did M-D start calling the DC-9-80 the MD-80, anyway?

When McDonnell bought out Douglas and became McDonnell Douglas.



Flying an aeroplane with only a single propeller to keep you in the air. Can you imagine that? -Capt. Picard
User currently offlineFlyguy41 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 36 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 7885 times:

AA still refers to the MD-80 as a Super 80. As a co-woker stated once - "it's because they were Super....in the 80s!"

User currently offlineKiwiandrew From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 8544 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 7734 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting NWADC9 (Reply 1):
Quoting FlyPIJets (Thread starter):
When did M-D start calling the DC-9-80 the MD-80, anyway?

When McDonnell bought out Douglas and became McDonnell Douglas.

I dont think so , IIRC , McDonnell Douglas was formed in 1967 , the DC-9 super 80 dates from 1979 and the name change to MD80 happened around 1983



Moderation in all things ... including moderation ;-)
User currently offlineRikkus67 From Canada, joined Jun 2000, 1625 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 7661 times:

IIRC, from the DC-9-10 to the DC-9-50, McDonnell Douglas kept the "DC" (Douglas Commercial) designation. With the development of the DC-9-80, MD wanted to reflect that this was more than just another stretch, and also to finally reflect that this was a truly "MD" product. This is also why the MD-11 was named as such.

However, in early marketing, the aircaft was known simply as the "Super 80". AA liked the moniker, and kept it.

Does anyone know how many of the -80, -82, -83 series were built before they went on to develop the -87 (shorter fuselage)? Although long in the tooth now, the MD-80 series was a successful workhouse for numerous airlines, and continues to labour on today.

If she continues to be properly maintained, I am sure we will be here years from now speculating when the final -80's series will be retired (go Allegiant!! hehe), such as we have speculated about her smaller sibling...



AC.WA.CP.DL.RW.CO.WG.WJ.WN.KI.FL.SK.ACL.UA.US.F9
User currently offlineMilesrich From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1993 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 7598 times:

The reason that American started referrring to the DC-9-80 as a Super 80 goes back to the crash of AA 191, a DC-10 ORD-LAX on May 25, 1979. After the accident and the DC-10 grounding, American dropped DC-10 from their aircraft signage (formerly known as DC-10 LuxuryLiners). And when they introduced the DC-9-80's, they decided to not use the DC term.

MD-88, MD-90, MD-95 and MD-11 were launched as McDonnell Douglas products. The DC-9 and DC-10 were launched by Douglas before the acquisition/merger by/with St. Louis based McDonnell, although the first flight of the DC-10 was after the merger. However, although the DC-10 was considered a good airplane by most, it had a few spectacular accidents that gave it a bad name, and MD decided to abandon its Douglas heritage, in designating aircraft. The MD-82 and 83's all have DC-9-82/83 on the front door manufacturer's plates. The MD-88, 90 does not use the DC-9 id. And of course, the MD-95's were all delivered as Boeing 717's.


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21476 posts, RR: 60
Reply 6, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 7477 times:



Quoting Flyguy41 (Reply 2):
AA still refers to the MD-80 as a Super 80. As a co-woker stated once - "it's because they were Super....in the 80s!"

And yet their type is simply DC-9-82/83/87



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5731 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 7182 times:

Okay, let's set these things straight here.

MD-81, 82, and 83 are DC-9-8X series.
MD-87, 88, 90 are all MD-XX.


And, to the original poster, Alitalia also called theirs SUPER.
It has nothing to do with the DC-10 crash in O'hare.... the same way that Delta called their DC-8-63s "SUPER SIXTIES", to distiguish a new (yet undistinguishably familiar) aircraft type. An MD-80 is just a DC-9, to the casual observer. But when you call it Super, it establishes that the product is in some way "new and improved," so to speak.

Now, the trivia bit that DID have something to do with the AA DC-10 crash in O'hare is when AA removed "DC-10" from the noses of those airplanes. Remember when all AA jets had their types writtes on them? I.e., "Super 80 Luxury Jet" or "767 Luxury Liner"? Yeah, well, the DC-10s simply said, "Luxury Liner."


User currently offlineLonghornmaniac From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 3278 posts, RR: 45
Reply 8, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 7142 times:

If I'm not mistaken, doesn't Alitalia still call them the Super 80?

Cheers,
Cameron

Indeed they do. http://www.airliners.net/photo/Alita...McDonnell-Douglas-MD-82/1510729/L/

[Edited 2009-04-18 14:36:00]

User currently offlineDBQ From United States of America, joined Apr 2009, 55 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 6812 times:

I know the AA 80s are old sleds and are cumbersome to fly, but on a two- or three-hour flight, I love them. Especially if I am with a companion, if I am the two-seat side, it is almost like first class. In front of the wing, it is almost silent (except for folks on the ground). I will trade the two-seat aspect for TV screens on a 737 any day.

User currently offlineTrijetsRMissed From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 2331 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 6495 times:

AA did not coin the name "Super 80". This was what MDC used to market the aircraft when it was launched in the late 70s. The prototype even had the "DC-9 Super 80 Series" title on the house livery.

Following the bad press of AA 191, MDC adopted the "MD-80" moniker with the EIS of the MD-83. The idea was to distance the commercial line from anything "DC" related, to at least gain a fresh start in the eyes of the public. "DC-10" around this time, might as well have been profanity.

Quoting Rikkus67 (Reply 4):
Does anyone know how many of the -80, -82, -83 series were built before they went on to develop the -87 (shorter fuselage)?

Don't quote me on this, but my educated guess would be somewhere just shy of 400 frames. If I'm not mistaken, the 1,000th frame was delivered to AS in 1992.

Quoting AA737-823 (Reply 7):
Okay, let's set these things straight here.

MD-81, 82, and 83 are DC-9-8X series.
MD-87, 88, 90 are all MD-XX.

Close, the MD-87 is also a DC-9-87.



There's nothing quite like a tri-jet.
User currently offlineKRIC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2002, 279 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 6289 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Although neither carrier is in existence anymore, I know that either AirCal or PSA referred to their planes as Super 80s....I specifically remember when I was a kid, growing up in Southern California in the '80s, seeing TV commercials for either PSA or AirCal (can't remember which one) that heralded the "New DC-9 Super 80 series."

I'm pretty sure both airlines operated the type. We lived just west of ONT from '82 to '89, and I seem to remember seeing MD-8Xs in both airlines' colors.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24906 posts, RR: 22
Reply 12, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 6237 times:



Quoting TrijetsRMissed (Reply 10):
Quoting Rikkus67 (Reply 4):
Does anyone know how many of the -80, -82, -83 series were built before they went on to develop the -87 (shorter fuselage)?

Don't quote me on this, but my educated guess would be somewhere just shy of 400 frames. If I'm not mistaken, the 1,000th frame was delivered to AS in 1992.

According to Boeing orders/deliveries data, the first MD-87 was delivered March 15, 1988. By then, 458 other MD-80 models had been delivered, including 88 -81s, 308 -82s, 55 -83s, and 7 -88s.


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21476 posts, RR: 60
Reply 13, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5845 times:



Quoting TrijetsRMissed (Reply 10):
Close, the MD-87 is also a DC-9-87.

Which is why I included it and not the 90 and 95. But I forgot entirely about the 81 model.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineAlitalia744 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 4746 posts, RR: 45
Reply 14, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5814 times:

Alitalia also referred to the MD80 as the "Super 80"


Some see lines, others see between the lines.
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24906 posts, RR: 22
Reply 15, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5785 times:



Quoting Alitalia744 (Reply 14):
Alitalia also referred to the MD80 as the "Super 80"

As did Swissair, the launch carrier and first operator.


User currently offlinePGNCS From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 2821 posts, RR: 45
Reply 16, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 5664 times:



Quoting DBQ (Reply 9):
I know the AA 80s are old sleds and are cumbersome to fly, but on a two- or three-hour flight, I love them.

I prefer them too, and they aren't cumbersome to fly!  Smile

Quoting DBQ (Reply 9):
I will trade the two-seat aspect for TV screens on a 737 any day.

I couldn't agree with you more!


User currently offlineStillageek From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 5221 times:

I fly on AA MD80's often (5-10X a month) The 2 seat side is nice, but there is a little less legroom on that side. Also the coach seats on the former TWA MD80s aren't as comfy. They don't have winged headrest and the seat backs are lower making it harder to stretch out.

User currently offlineMtnWest1979 From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 2433 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 5051 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting KRIC777 (Reply 11):
Although neither carrier is in existence anymore, I know that either AirCal or PSA referred to their planes as Super 80s....I specifically remember when I was a kid, growing up in Southern California in the '80s, seeing TV commercials for either PSA or AirCal (can't remember which one) that heralded the "New DC-9 Super 80 series."

Yes, both PS and OC flew them. In my PSA timetables they are referred to as "DC-9 Super 80 Fanjets". They showed DC-9-80 flights in red print early on when they got them.

In the AirCal timetables, they called them DC-9 Super 80 and depicted them as D98 in the timetables.



"If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
User currently offlineTrijetsRMissed From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 2331 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4703 times:



Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 12):
Quoting TrijetsRMissed (Reply 10):
Quoting Rikkus67 (Reply 4):
Does anyone know how many of the -80, -82, -83 series were built before they went on to develop the -87 (shorter fuselage)?

Don't quote me on this, but my educated guess would be somewhere just shy of 400 frames. If I'm not mistaken, the 1,000th frame was delivered to AS in 1992.

According to Boeing orders/deliveries data, the first MD-87 was delivered March 15, 1988. By then, 458 other MD-80 models had been delivered, including 88 -81s, 308 -82s, 55 -83s, and 7 -88s.

Thanks Viscount. So at program launch, the number probably would have been in the 300-350 range.

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 13):
Which is why I included it and not the 90 and 95. But I forgot entirely about the 81 model

I understand. But I was responding to AA737-823.

Quoting Stillageek (Reply 17):
Also the coach seats on the former TWA MD80s aren't as comfy. They don't have winged headrest and the seat backs are lower making it harder to stretch out.

 checkmark  That's true, they didn't receive the cabin mods that the originals did.



There's nothing quite like a tri-jet.
User currently offlineRAFVC10 From Spain, joined Sep 2005, 1980 posts, RR: 6
Reply 20, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3914 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 8):
If I'm not mistaken, doesn't Alitalia still call them the Super 80?

Yes, you're right. As seen in this photo...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Giovanni Tessari



Regards,

Gerard



El dia que los gilipollas vuelen, no podremos ver la luz del sol!
User currently offlineArcher From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 129 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3641 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I agree with DBQ.
3 and 2 seating beats anything except the multi-thousand dollar
seats upfront - as long as you have the "2".
Beyond my budget.


User currently offlineTWAtwaTWA From United States of America, joined May 2006, 141 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3625 times:

Ozark Airlines merged with TWA in 1986, and they had many earlier DC-9 models, with many new MD-80s in their fleet upon merger. Doesn't the current AA fleet contain some of these classic MD-80 models?


We're your kind of airline. Uh, I mean, We *were* your kind of airline.
User currently offlineTrijetsRMissed From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 2331 posts, RR: 7
Reply 23, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3037 times:



Quoting TWAtwaTWA (Reply 22):
Ozark Airlines merged with TWA in 1986, and they had many earlier DC-9 models, with many new MD-80s in their fleet upon merger. Doesn't the current AA fleet contain some of these classic MD-80 models?

Only two aircraft were delivered to Ozark before the merger. These were WFU with AA in 2005. A good portion of the ex-TW older mad dogs also left in 2003.



There's nothing quite like a tri-jet.
User currently offlineStapleton From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 280 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3029 times:

The original Frontier also used the Super 80 name.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is USAirways The Only One With.... posted Mon Apr 10 2000 02:00:51 by Barnaby
Why Is United The Only One With posted Fri Mar 3 2000 05:38:16 by UAPilot7
Az Isn't The Only Italian Trouble Today posted Sun Jul 22 2007 00:01:05 by Max777geek
Intercont-Domestic-Intercont - Is MH The Only One? posted Wed Jan 25 2006 05:49:30 by UpperDeck79
Where's The F/O? Only One 744 Crew Member? posted Thu Aug 12 2004 09:36:05 by UA777222
Why Isn't The A380 Popular With Charter Operators? posted Sat Jun 19 2004 00:42:06 by GoMEA
Am I The Only One Who Likes To Visit The Airport? posted Sat Aug 25 2001 23:26:46 by Travel7
Am I The Only One? posted Tue Aug 21 2001 22:18:59 by Boeing757fan
Am I The Only One Who Is Afraid To Fly? posted Thu Jun 28 2001 23:19:38 by Apollo13
Am I The Only One Who Is Afraid To Fly? posted Thu Jun 28 2001 23:19:00 by Apollo13