Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New England Thread #11  
User currently offlineNbgskygod From United States of America, joined May 2004, 726 posts, RR: 1
Posted (4 years 12 months 11 hours ago) and read 2238 times:

It looks like the previous thread has been archived, so here is #11.

To start this one off, I have it on realitively decent authority, that the F-15s may be making a return visit to Lebanon this comming thursday 4/30. I hope this is going to start a nice trend back to the days when the A-10s would make a few turns in our playground.


"I use multi-billion dollar military satellite systems to find tupperware in the woods."
31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineIliriBDL From Germany, joined May 2007, 1205 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (4 years 12 months 11 hours ago) and read 2232 times:

Any chance of B6 starting service at BDL? I heard they had people there few weeks ago checking out the airport. (maybe just a rumor? I wasn't there to see them, but someone told me)


delta.com
User currently offlineTomcbaker From Canada, joined Jul 2007, 48 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (4 years 12 months 9 hours ago) and read 2213 times:



Quoting Nbgskygod (Thread starter):
To start this one off, I have it on realitively decent authority, that the F-15s may be making a return visit to Lebanon this comming thursday 4/30. I hope this is going to start a nice trend back to the days when the A-10s would make a few turns in our playground.

Nice. I wish I could be there to see it. Any word yet on how Cape Air is doing at LEB? Probably still "off to a slow start" eh?



tomcbaker
User currently offlineNbgskygod From United States of America, joined May 2004, 726 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (4 years 12 months 7 hours ago) and read 2205 times:



Quoting Tomcbaker (Reply 2):
Nice. I wish I could be there to see it. Any word yet on how Cape Air is doing at LEB? Probably still "off to a slow start" eh?

From what I have seen lately, most of their flights have been close to full. There was on flight that was completely empty both from and to Boston. Other than that I think they are doing fine. One day in the near future I am going to take a ride down and back and see how their service is (maybe spend the day shooting).



"I use multi-billion dollar military satellite systems to find tupperware in the woods."
User currently offlineLat41 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 459 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (4 years 12 months 3 hours ago) and read 2173 times:

This would be a good time to investigate airshows around New England for the Summer and their dates, of course. Contributions welcome.

Cheers


User currently offlineTomcbaker From Canada, joined Jul 2007, 48 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (4 years 12 months 2 hours ago) and read 2166 times:

Does anyone know how AS is doing with loads/profit on its service BOS-PDX? I flew on it roundtrip last month and the flights were not full. I spoke to an FA who mentioned she wouldn't be surprised if the route was eventually canceled, which would be a shame considering it's PDX's only service to Boston and the only AS service from PDX to anywhere on the east coast (http://www.alaskaair.com/as/alaska/images/asqxroutemap.pdf). I thought it was fantastic service to/from PDX.


tomcbaker
User currently offlineOnetogo From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 12 months 1 hour ago) and read 2152 times:



Quoting Tomcbaker (Reply 2):
Any word yet on how Cape Air is doing at LEB

EAS route. Loads don't really matter to them, but they have been doing fairly well.

Quoting Tomcbaker (Reply 5):
Does anyone know how AS is doing with loads/profit on its service BOS-PDX?

I have heard that this is rather slow for them. Obviously the nonstop SEA service is continuing to go extremely well, just as one would expect.


User currently offlineBOStonsox From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 1973 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (4 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2052 times:

You know what would be fun to see again? AC flying BOS-YVR. That route was doing pretty good from what I could recall. I wish someone would bring it back. They'd make some good money on it.

So why doesn't anyone fly BOS-SMF? While I know it isn't a good reason, it seems to me that since it has flights to JFK and IAD, it could support BOS as well. I know UA has a flight that goes BOS-ORD-SMF, or at least it did when I flew them to DSM in 2004.

Also, why is Terminal E so congested? Most of BOS's traffic is from Europe, and that arrives in the afternoon and leaves in the evening, but there should be room for incoming flights in the morning or later at night. I wish Massport had put WN elsewhere and/or expanded that terminal. A while back I mentioned the possibility of remote stands and it sounded like there was no reason they couldn't be done. There are plenty of international destinations BOS could use service to, but it's problematic with Terminal E the way it is.



2013 World Series Champions!
User currently offlineB752os From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1322 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (4 years 11 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2005 times:



Quoting Tomcbaker (Reply 5):
Does anyone know how AS is doing with loads/profit on its service BOS-PDX? I flew on it roundtrip last month and the flights were not full. I spoke to an FA who mentioned she wouldn't be surprised if the route was eventually canceled, which would be a shame considering it's PDX's only service to Boston and the only AS service from PDX to anywhere on the east coast (http://www.alaskaair.com/as/alaska/images/asqxroutemap.pdf). I thought it was fantastic service to/from PDX.

I have flown the route 5 times in the last 7 months and each time the flight have been at least 90% full or better each way. That is not a good look at the yields, but the loads from what I have experienced have been good. Others on these forums have said that the flights have been a surprise hit for AS.


User currently offlineRL757PVD From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4630 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (4 years 11 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2001 times:



Quoting IliriBDL (Reply 1):
Any chance of B6 starting service at BDL? I heard they had people there few weeks ago checking out the airport. (maybe just a rumor? I wasn't there to see them, but someone told me)

Seeing that BDL will have ZERO service to FLL after next month, I think B6 to BDL in the near future is almost certain. I think you will see pretty much a 1 for 1 swap with DL's Florida and sched and what B6 would provide... though im sure B6 could do 2x daily FLL.

Hopefully PVD will be in the near future too. BDL is too close for JFK, but I wonder if they could make PVD-JFK work on E190s.



Experience is what you get when what you thought would work out didn't!
User currently offlineB752os From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1322 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (4 years 11 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1967 times:



Quoting RL757PVD (Reply 9):
Seeing that BDL will have ZERO service to FLL after next month, I think B6 to BDL in the near future is almost certain. I think you will see pretty much a 1 for 1 swap with DL's Florida and sched and what B6 would provide... though im sure B6 could do 2x daily FLL.

Hopefully PVD will be in the near future too. BDL is too close for JFK, but I wonder if they could make PVD-JFK work on E190s.

I can't believe BDL will have no FLL service. I know they have flights to MIA on AA, but none to FLL? I wonder why no WN.


User currently offlineIcelandair75W From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 150 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (4 years 11 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1952 times:

To be honest, I think SW chose Terminal E. They're using the old NW checkin counters which has bags lead to their own bag room, and they have direct and fast access to the gates they will use (E1AB and E2AB and I think also the old FL gates (1ABCDE). Good move IMO.

User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4012 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (4 years 11 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1947 times:

I heard last week that the MHT tower was at risk of losing some staffing because flight operations have fallen. One is a function of the other. So, we might see military practice approaches at some airports that need to get their 'operations' numbers up. I've seen Coast Guard C-130s and NHANG KC-135s at Manchester, plus others from time to time.

User currently offlineRL757PVD From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4630 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (4 years 11 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1941 times:



Quoting Icelandair75W (Reply 11):
To be honest, I think SW chose Terminal E. They're using the old NW checkin counters which has bags lead to their own bag room, and they have direct and fast access to the gates they will use (E1AB and E2AB and I think also the old FL gates (1ABCDE). Good move IMO.

What else was available?



Experience is what you get when what you thought would work out didn't!
User currently offlineSectflyer From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 359 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (4 years 11 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1880 times:



Quoting RL757PVD (Reply 9):

Seeing that BDL will have ZERO service to FLL after next month

I found that hard to believe so I did a quick check. Yes the direct flight was gone in June but it was bookable in Dec. Only 1 nonstop a day. I think I remember 3 not to long ago. B6 would be a great addition. I just did OAK-JFK yesterday on them(you have to check out the JFK terminal! Incredible!) But where is the gate space for them when the Murphy terminal closes and AA moves over?


User currently offlineAirbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 7874 posts, RR: 10
Reply 15, posted (4 years 11 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1859 times:



Quoting BOStonsox (Reply 7):
Also, why is Terminal E so congested? Most of BOS's traffic is from Europe, and that arrives in the afternoon and leaves in the evening, but there should be room for incoming flights in the morning or later at night. I wish Massport had put WN elsewhere and/or expanded that terminal. A while back I mentioned the possibility of remote stands and it sounded like there was no reason they couldn't be done. There are plenty of international destinations BOS could use service to, but it's problematic with Terminal E the way it is.

I wouldn't say it is congested. As you say, most gates are busy during the typical TATL rush hour but Massport does have pretty good incentives out for new international destinations and new international airlines and no one has shown interest, so it's not like Terminal E needs to be expanded. With NW moving out that frees up at least 1 more international gate. Asia service would fit in nicely because Asian departures and arrivals don't conflict with European departures and arrivals, but that horse has been beaten to death already  Smile


User currently offlineB595 From UK - Scotland, joined Mar 2009, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (4 years 11 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1853 times:



Quoting ChrisNH (Reply 12):
I heard last week that the MHT tower was at risk of losing some staffing because flight operations have fallen. One is a function of the other. So, we might see military practice approaches at some airports that need to get their 'operations' numbers up. I've seen Coast Guard C-130s and NHANG KC-135s at Manchester, plus others from time to time.

Do you see any C5's from SWF? Back in the 80's they used to do approaches at BTV every now and then. Was a real treat, especially hearing the TF39 engines power-up for go-around/missed approach.


User currently offlineBOStonsox From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 1973 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (4 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1836 times:



Quoting Airbazar (Reply 15):
I wouldn't say it is congested. As you say, most gates are busy during the typical TATL rush hour but Massport does have pretty good incentives out for new international destinations and new international airlines and no one has shown interest, so it's not like Terminal E needs to be expanded.

There are a few airlines in Europe that don't serve BOS but are often rumored to be starting soon. SA and TP are supposedly looking into adding service to Stockholm and Lisbon, and I wouldn't be surprised to see BRU service down the road, but that would probably be LH when they acquire SN. I wonder if we could see GLA service added as well. It is when those three arrive (if they arrive) we'll see congestion issues.

Quoting Sectflyer (Reply 14):
B6 would be a great addition.

For Florida service, yes. Too bad BOS and JFK are so close because those would open up the rest of the B6 network to the BDL customers. IAD could happen, especially because B6 flies from there to California, Florida, CUN and SJU.

Quoting Icelandair75W (Reply 11):
(E1AB and E2AB and I think also the old FL gates (1ABCDE).

I don't think they are using the old FL gates (in fact I'm almost 100% sure they're not). Those are technically in Terminal C despite being connected to Terminal E. I don't know who uses them, but if they're open WN should be going there and letting an international carrier use the gates they are going to use now.



2013 World Series Champions!
User currently offlineNbgskygod From United States of America, joined May 2004, 726 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (4 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1801 times:



Quoting ChrisNH (Reply 12):
heard last week that the MHT tower was at risk of losing some staffing because flight operations have fallen. One is a function of the other. So, we might see military practice approaches at some airports that need to get their 'operations' numbers up. I've seen Coast Guard C-130s and NHANG KC-135s at Manchester, plus others from time to time.

That will probably increase the rumors of the FAA finally contracting MHT tower out. That is interesting since the FCT contracts are up for negotiation this year. We may see MHT go contract in the near future.



"I use multi-billion dollar military satellite systems to find tupperware in the woods."
User currently offlinePVD757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3406 posts, RR: 17
Reply 19, posted (4 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1787 times:

Today is the first day that NW operations have been absorbed into DL space at PVD. They are still removing the last of the NW signs around the terminal.

User currently offlineRL757PVD From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4630 posts, RR: 12
Reply 20, posted (4 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1780 times:



Quoting PVD757 (Reply 19):
Today is the first day that NW operations have been absorbed into DL space at PVD. They are still removing the last of the NW signs around the terminal.

Can't wait to see stripes of blue or a cursive lowercase "a" behind their old ticket counter!



Experience is what you get when what you thought would work out didn't!
User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4012 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (4 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1760 times:



Quoting B595 (Reply 16):
Do you see any C5's from SWF?

No, but I'm with you: That's an amazing plane to watch and hear. Whenever I go to an air show, the plane I'm most interested in seeing fly (aside from the F-16s/F-15s/F-18s/F-14s) is the C-5. But if MHT is 'at risk' of losing funding or staffing as a direct result of reduced operations, then I would think we'd be calling in all the 'Touch-and-goes' we can.


User currently offlineSectflyer From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 359 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (4 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1739 times:



Quoting PVD757 (Reply 19):
Today is the first day that NW operations have been absorbed into DL space at PVD. They are still removing the last of the NW signs around the terminal.

It will be nice to have mainline service back at pvd!


User currently offlineRL757PVD From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4630 posts, RR: 12
Reply 23, posted (4 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1686 times:



Quoting Sectflyer (Reply 22):
It will be nice to have mainline service back at pvd!

it never left! US still has about 10 daily UA 2-3 daily and NW up to 4. I guess TECHNICALY this marks the return of "Delta" mainline... just need maintine to return to ATL, which i think will happen once the fleets are fully mixed.. the A319 is a better sized aircraft for the route than an MD88



Experience is what you get when what you thought would work out didn't!
User currently offlineSectflyer From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 359 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (4 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1653 times:

Yeah, I was refering to DL. And yes they need it to ATL. I have not flown DL from PVD since they went RJ and I won't!

25 RL757PVD : I havent used PVD hardly at all but thats primarily because of the fares. The CR7 isnt as bad as the CR2. Im actually using PVD for the first time in
26 Mjgbtv : So how does that work? It seems like BTV has always had a fair amount of military approach activity, but I always figured it had something to do with
27 Sectflyer : Has DL/NW given up gate 11 at PVD? Is the former AA gate being used for anything besides overnight parking for WN?
28 PVD757 : No. No.
29 Post contains images Nbgskygod : Lebanon recieved a bit of an inpromtu airshow today. 3 F-15s from the 104th FW made several low passes along runway 36. 78-0474, 78-0475, and 78-0476
30 B595 : Like the shot! Have you considered trying to upload that? It would need some work in Photoshop, maybe an hour or two give or take, but I think it wou
31 Nbgskygod : I was planning on uploading on "the other site". I do still have some work to do on them. I did a bunch of quick and dirty edits (I had 50 something s
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Official New England Thread # 8 posted Sun Oct 19 2008 20:12:54 by WarRI1
Official New England Aviation Thread #9 posted Fri Jan 9 2009 12:46:07 by ChrisNH
Official New England Aviation Thread #8 posted Sun Nov 23 2008 14:46:28 by ChrisNH
Official New England Aviation Thread #7 posted Thu Sep 4 2008 07:50:18 by ChrisNH
Official New England Aviation Thread #6 posted Wed Jul 16 2008 12:20:19 by ChrisNH
Official New England Aviation Thread #5 posted Thu Apr 17 2008 18:18:56 by Diamond
Official New England Aviation Thread #4 posted Thu Feb 14 2008 20:39:44 by BAGoldEx
Official New England Aviation Thread #3 posted Mon Jan 14 2008 11:37:55 by BAGoldEx
Official New England Aviation Thread #2 posted Wed Dec 19 2007 19:21:48 by B752OS
New Zealand Aviation Thread #11 posted Tue Sep 11 2007 12:39:39 by 777ER