Aio86 From United States of America, joined exactly 14 years ago today! , 928 posts, RR: 0 Posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1732 times:
Hello. I'm in DC now and I was looking over some international schedules from the Washington area. They have a good amount of international flights to Europe (and 2 important links to Asia), however two European airlines fly to Baltimore Int'l, rather than Dulles. Aer Lingus and Icelandair fly Baltimore - Dublin/Shannon and Reikjavic (pardon the spelling). Why did they chose to go to Baltimore? Is it cheaper? Isn't there a bigger market at Dulles?
Ironminds From Australia, joined Apr 2001, 556 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1671 times:
Got to disagree with you KALB, I used to live in DC. First of all, by car/taxi, BWI was a good deal farther, by 20 minutes and $20. Number two, there's like nothing to eat or do in BWI in terms of restaurants and bars and stuff. I had to walk a mile to get a bite the last time I was tehre flying Iceland Air.
Now this is not to say that Dulles is any great shakes. Whoever designed it with the hurdy-gurdy busses between terminals was a real sadist.
DesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7780 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1667 times:
BWI is indeed cheaper to fly to. As for distance from DC both Dulles and BWI are really equidistant. But BWI does have a direct rail connection, both Amtrak and Marc, plus Baltimore Metro light rail all have connections to BWI. There is now a lot of talk of extending the Orange line from Vienna out to Dulles, but that will take sometime to complete if and when it is approved. Plus BWI has a much larger population cachement in its favor, not only DC and Baltimore but much of Maryland and parts of Delaware and Pennslyvania. However the population growth in Northern Virginia is much faster than in Maryland.
But the short answer is that really all things are equal, but BWI is cheaper.
Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
UnitedIAD From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 18 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1648 times:
BWI has a beautiful new international terminal which is convenient and uncrowded. Also, neither Aer Lingus nor Icelandair are part of Star Alliance, so there is no incentive for them to fly into IAD and connect to UA (unlike bmi's new service).
Trintocan From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2000, 3238 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1640 times:
That is something interesting to think about. JM also serves only BWI from MBJ whereas BWIA flies to IAD. In BW's case, though, it does codeshare with UA there. About 15 years ago BWIA started flying to BWI but the service, which needless to say caused some local confusion as the airline and airport bore the same initials, was cancelled after about 2 years.
Gocaps16 From Japan, joined Jan 2000, 4346 posts, RR: 20
Reply 7, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1632 times:
BWI has other international airlines either then Icelandair and Aer Lingus. British Airways, Air Jamaica, and Ghana Airways operates into BWI. But yes, BWI is A LOT cheaper then fly out of either IAD or DCA. You can save $200-$300 if you're flying outta BWI.
I once paid $202 RT from BWI-SAN on Continental while outta DCA or IAD it'll be $400+ RT. What a difference.
Also, all the JMC charters flies into BWI instead of IAD or DCA. Especially on a sunday all the unusal cool cargo and charter operations flies into BWI.
Republic From Canada, joined Dec 2012, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1619 times:
It was not always that way.Prior to Southwest arriving at BWI, fares were similar to IAD. Whether you personally like Southwest or not, you have to appreciate the effect they have on affordable air travel.
Tomindc From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 127 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1607 times:
I've never flown Southwest but have certainly shared the benefits. I can remember a few years ago having DL quote me a fare of about $650 from DCA to BHM, and that was WITH a Saturday night stay. From BWI, still using DL, it was $298. Why? Southwest flies the route too!
KALB From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 573 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1603 times:
From an airliner nut point of view, I like BWI better tha IAD because of its airliner nut-friendly observation deck (complete with 727 wing, 737-200 flight deck and vertical stablizer). The runways are closer to the terminal, so its easier to watch take offs and landings. If you want great restaurants, take a cab to the inner harbor...great crab cakes.
Gocaps16 From Japan, joined Jan 2000, 4346 posts, RR: 20
Reply 11, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1588 times:
Southwest Airlines ISN'T necessarily cheap outta BWI.
I've never flown on Southwest either and I don't intend to becuase of the long lines when you check in. But couple years ago, I saw an ad on TV about SWA's $99 coast-to-coast special from BWI and other airpoers on the east and west coast. I called up Southwest about the $99 one-way fares and the reps had no idea about it and told us the regular round-trip fares from BWI-SAN was over $400. I said no way and hung up. I went to my local travel agent who I know, found me the $202 RT Continental flight from BWI-IAH-SAN flying the deluxe 727 on the BWI-IAH with a 3 hour layover in IAH. I took it cause of the fares, the CO 727, and the 3 hour layover for spotting at IAH and arrived SAN in mid afternoon. Southwest do have some cheap fares but you gotta look thru them really hard.