Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
"No Way BA/AA"  
User currently offlineAio86 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 929 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2837 times:

Hello everyone. Today I flew home from Washington to LA but I saw an interesting aircraft at Dulles. The Virgin Atlantic 744 had a sticker that said, "No Way BA/AA." I suppose this was talking about the alliance between BA and AA (which to the best of my knowledge is not going well). Why does Virgin have this on its plane? How long have they been campaigning against it?

Also, what right do they have to say this (although they can do whatever they want with their own planes), to say no to this alliance, (between now the two largest airlines on each side of the Atlantic), when they themselves have an alliance with Continental?

Any info about this whole campaign, I'd be very interested to hear. Thanks.


7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineVC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 1999, 3727 posts, RR: 32
Reply 1, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2791 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It's been on the side of VS a/c for about 4 years now

User currently offlineEnglandair From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2000, 2228 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2759 times:

The B744 you saw was the only remaining old livery B744 in the fleet (G-VTOP, Vaginia Plane).
The 'NO WAY BA/AA' titles have not been incorporated into the new livery and so only remain now on a few of the old livery planes.

User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2753 times:

China Girl (G-VSEA) still has it...I thought that it would have been taken off by now...

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L

User currently offlineBostonBeau From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 487 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2728 times:

You answered your own question Aio86...it is BECAUSE AA and BA are so large that a small airline like VS is concerned. AA and BA already carry the greatest share of the traffic between the US and the UK, probably more than the remaining airlines combined (anyone got statistics?)

User currently offlineIkarus From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 3524 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2698 times:

The reply to this provocation can now be found on many a BA plane:
"F*ck Virgin"

Just kidding....

Virgin was lobbying rather hard to prevent BA and AA from codesharing out of Heathrow, which would have given this alliance a MAJOR advantage over any other airline, and could have seriously damaged Virgin Atlantic. Of course, they would think otherwise if they had been offered more slots in return for the alliance to be permitted.

So, will they now change to "No Way, LH/BD/AC/UA/RG/SK" - who now together have more than 25% of slots in Heathrow and have been rumoured to build Heathrow into a hub for Star? Methinks not. Branson is only popular as long as he bullies BA....



User currently offlinePhilB From Ireland, joined May 1999, 2915 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2671 times:

Ikarus, you are flying too close to the sun!!!

Branson only popular as long as he bullieds BA...?

Branson and the Virgin companies are popular because they are innovative and, whilst they have not always succeeded in every venture, they are seen as being more in tune with the average guy than big corporations and, in airline terms, BA in particular.

As for bullying BA... I suppose David's slaying of Goliath was bullying in your dictionary.

User currently offlineIkarus From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 3524 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2655 times:

David and Goliath? Never heard of 'em...

Anyway: I truely like VS, and would fly them rather than BA anytime - I just tend to get fed up at Branson... The dirty tricks campaign has been finsihed and paid for long ago, and yet there is still propaganda depicting BA as the evil archenemy and bad guy of the people...

Don't take my post too seriously - it wasn't exactly written in a very serious tone, either



PS Flying too close to the sun.... LOL .... NOW I get it!  Laugh out loud  Laugh out loud

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
"NO WAY BA/AA" posted Fri Jun 1 2001 02:02:10 by PanAm747
"No Way BA/AA" posted Sun Apr 15 2001 08:03:45 by Aio86
"No Way BA/AA" posted Thu Jun 22 2000 19:35:16 by 747orDie
"NO WAY BA/AA" posted Thu Mar 30 2000 05:40:35 by Turboprop
"No Way BA/AA" ? posted Mon Oct 25 1999 04:24:22 by Dazed767
No Way BA/AA posted Sat Oct 27 2001 23:10:23 by N17085
No Way BA/AA? posted Thu Jan 11 2001 21:41:55 by Zsx81
No way BA/AA on VA acft posted Tue Feb 16 1999 12:15:08 by V jet
NO WAY BA/KLM! posted Thu Sep 21 2000 20:00:59 by B737-700
NO WAY BA/AA on VA posted Sun Feb 14 1999 05:34:13 by flyf15