Well, not really. If you open both photos you can see that the yellow circle in the A333's tail is closer to the edge in comparison to the A332. I assume that both circles have the same diameter but due to the smaller tail fin of the A333 it's closer to the edge.
77West From New Zealand, joined Jun 2009, 70 posts, RR: 0 Reply 10, posted (4 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 11275 times:
Quoting N14AZ (Reply 9): Ohh, sorry, just tried to help. Maybe this one is better?
It did illustrate the main differences, but your LH pictures do this even better. Perfect angle to see the bigger tail and different lengths.
In case anyone was wondering, the bigger tail is due to the shorter fuselage of the -200, hence a larger area is needed to preserve the moment arm of the tail. The same tail is used on the -500 and -600 variants.
77West From New Zealand, joined Jun 2009, 70 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (4 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 11213 times:
Quoting N14AZ (Reply 11): Excuse me, where are my manners.... Welcome to A.net!
Thank you! I have been a 'lurker' for some time during my aviation studies and I enjoy reading the various forums, a friend suggested I join up instead of arguing with him all the time over forum postings! (Off topic I know)
As for the A330, there is a nice little table from Airbus for each of the models which might help:
Jfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 7847 posts, RR: 8 Reply 15, posted (4 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 10090 times:
The A330-300 was to be purely a medium haul airplane and the later -200 a lonh haul, a 767-300ER killer. Airbus has increased the take-off weight of the -300 to be able to fly many long haul flights with twin efficiency, Finnair & SAS are heavy users of teh A333 for longer flights.