Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Cosmic Radiation Risk To Flight Crew  
User currently offlineTsully From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 651 posts, RR: 4
Posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1485 times:


What do you all think about cosmic radiation? Can anyone provide additional insight?

The following information was derived from the UAL pamphlet, "Frequently asked Questions about Cosmic Radiation". This pamphlet was published as a source of information for crewmembers to address their risks.



From what I've read, only those who fly very frequently (i.e. flight crew) are at risk. Apparently, a crewmember flying long haul routes for 20 years would have a 23.3% rate of developing cancer.

The three general hypothetical risks are:

·Cancer risk
·Genetic risks
·Risk to an unborn child.

Three factors which affect the amount of exposure:

1) Flight altitude and duration at that altitude
2) Geographic latitude of that flight
3) Stage of the solar cycle

"Aircraft usually fly at high latitude or polar routes between the U.S. and Europe or Asia; therefore these international routes are more exposed compared to domestic operations".


Your opinions, please.



I love America. I guess that makes me Bush's poodle, but I'd rather be a dog in New York City than a prince in Riyadh.
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineApuneger From Belgium, joined Sep 2000, 3032 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1439 times:

Well, of course this topic is really serious, but I'd rather die from having flown twice a day, then by eating a contaminated cow or so.

Has any institution (FAA,...) ever performed investigations into this, or not? I'd sure like to know, but even when this is true, I won't stop flying. That's my opinion.

Ivan



Ivan Coninx - Brussels Aviation Photography
User currently offlineTsully From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 651 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1434 times:

I won't stop flying, either. I'm sure the FAA has studied this, and I understand that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and NASA have studied the situation in some capacity as well. UAL’s medical department has studied this situation, also.


I love America. I guess that makes me Bush's poodle, but I'd rather be a dog in New York City than a prince in Riyadh.
User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6434 posts, RR: 54
Reply 3, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1433 times:

This issue pops up every now and then.
If it really was a valid issue, then we would know.
There is statistical data enough out there. Remember that every two or three seconds 24 hours a day an airliner takes off somewhere in the world.
Crew unions would negotiate extra benefits for every flight level above 10,000 feet.
The Concorde would have flown as a cargo plane only.
Boeing would never have presented their high flying sonic cruiser as the world's 8th wonder.
Astronauts would... - well, I don't know.
Etc. etc.
I don't believe in it.
Best regards, Preben Norholm



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1417 times:

For those of you that get Aviation Week, there is a good article about this on a story about polar routes.

User currently offlineTsully From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 651 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1412 times:

boeing nut,

What issue? I haven't read this week's yet.



I love America. I guess that makes me Bush's poodle, but I'd rather be a dog in New York City than a prince in Riyadh.
User currently offlineRoberson From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 156 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1404 times:

Does anyone know of the most common types of cancer? I think I've heard that skin cancer seems to be found more frequently in pilot (although research still has a long way to go). I've heard arguments on both sides of the issue. An interesting point some will argue is that since pilots are some of the most healthy people and have medical exams so frequently, they are still at less of a risk for loss of life due to cancer (because the cancer can't spread as far as it might in a normal person who isn't scrutinized healthwise on a regular basis). Just another viewpoint on the issue. Good day.

User currently offlineBostonBeau From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 463 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1403 times:

Didn't Concorde carry solar radiation monitors, and have to descend rapidly to lower altitudes if the alarms went off?

User currently offlineTsully From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 651 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1389 times:

Good point about the medical exams.
regards,
tsully



I love America. I guess that makes me Bush's poodle, but I'd rather be a dog in New York City than a prince in Riyadh.
User currently offlineSkippy208 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1394 times:

There was also a good article abou this in the National Enquirer. They said that the government has irrefutable (although they didn't use such a long word) evidence that cosmic radiation is killing hundreds of flight crews a year. The flights in question are diverted to Roswell, NM and the bodies disposed of discreetly. The next of kin are then quietly eliminated.

I think there is going to be an X Files episode soon about this.

Skippy


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Cosmic Radiation Threat To Ac? posted Sat Oct 15 2005 11:31:22 by C130jbloke
NWA55: Diversion Due To Flight Crew Discretion posted Sun Dec 14 2003 04:46:55 by Pilottim747
Talking To Flight Crew posted Thu Dec 4 2003 06:43:29 by Tcfc424
What To Do When Flight Crew Can' T Get Along posted Thu Mar 16 2006 04:07:34 by Scalebuilder
Ryanair: Flight Diversion Due To Ill Crew Member posted Sun Aug 17 2003 09:07:05 by Fabian Schuetz
What Happened To The SQ 006 Flight Crew? posted Thu Jan 31 2002 12:23:07 by Ryu2
Websites Dedicated To Flight Attendants? posted Fri Nov 10 2006 06:00:48 by ThaiA345
NW Flight Crew Help? posted Mon Oct 23 2006 05:34:07 by Widget1580
CO's "Island Hopper" Flight Crew Staffing posted Fri Oct 13 2006 22:13:40 by Tom in NO
US-West Flights Added To *A Flight Lists posted Tue Aug 15 2006 19:35:24 by Kearnet