Fxramper From United States, joined Dec 2005, 5154 posts, RR: 99 Posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 27570 times:
BA #77 (G-RAES) was parked at LAD while the HU A346 taxied out on the apron and collided at the stand with the Boeing. BA reported the wing hangs significantly down following the collision. Anyone see a picture?
SW733 From Namibia, joined Feb 2004, 3429 posts, RR: 14 Reply 1, posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 27614 times:
Well I tried to check BA.com flight status but the result states that they do not fly to Luanda...someone should have told the crew that, this whole situation could have been avoided
Seriously though, hope everyone is ok. Sounds pretty nasty if what BA is saying is true. There are some pretty cramped places on Luanda's tarmac
Dano1977 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2008, 135 posts, RR: 0 Reply 7, posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 26355 times:
According to Pprune.
A new Aileron has been borrowed from Boeing, and its making its way to Luanda, along with a BA team of engineers to fix. Thats the only damage that has been reported.
If you go to Pprune, and go to the Africa section, there is a whole thread about it on there. along with the possible cause of the accident from an eye witness.
Children should only be allowed on aircraft if 1. Muzzled and heavily sedated 2. Go as freight
TristarSteve From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 2836 posts, RR: 23 Reply 8, posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 26076 times:
The BA B777 was parked on the stand.
The Chinese A340 was taxying too fast onto a parking area and was 18m off the centre line, when it skidded on skydrol contaminated ground.
The BA needs an aileron, which has now been robbed from a BA B777 at Cardiff.
Pawsleykat From United Kingdom (Scotland), joined Jul 2005, 1816 posts, RR: 13 Reply 9, posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 25569 times:
I didn't even know Hainan flew to Luanda.
Quoting TristarSteve (Reply 8): The Chinese A340 was taxying too fast onto a parking area and was 18m off the centre line, when it skidded on skydrol contaminated ground.
Jeeezo, 18m off the centre line. How would one not even notice that they're that far off it?
Quoting TristarSteve (Reply 8): The BA needs an aileron, which has now been robbed from a BA B777 at Cardiff.
At least BA have managed to get a spare Aileron in time. Good ol' BAMC
JG
"Let Go, Get Up And Hit The Dance Floor" - Hannah Montana
SW733 From Namibia, joined Feb 2004, 3429 posts, RR: 14 Reply 10, posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 25516 times:
Quoting Fxramper (Reply 6): I thought I recalled you mentioning previously on the site you flew into LAD.
Aw shucks I'm remembered now? Yeah, LAD can sometimes be a (believe it or not) cheaper way to get to WDH than via South Africa, so I have done it a few times, both on TAAG and BA...not always, because a lot of the times the fares are incredibly high, but every once in a while you get lucky. Plus, Luanda isn't a half bad place actually.
Quoting TristarSteve (Reply 8): The Chinese A340 was taxying too fast onto a parking area and was 18m off the centre line, when it skidded on skydrol contaminated ground.
Yikes, sounds like an awfully big mistake on the Hainan crews part. If my non-photographic memory serves me correctly (probably not), it can get tight, but anything can get tight when you are 18 METERS (!!!) off the centre line...I mean that's about 60 feet, wow.
LHR27C From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 1200 posts, RR: 26 Reply 16, posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 23617 times:
Quoting TaromA380 (Reply 14): I wonder what the capitain of the Cardiff BA777 did say about that. embarrassed
Any 777s at CWL are undergoing heavy maintenance or cabin fittings and able to provide spare parts if needed quickly. BA don't operate any scheduled flights to CWL, let alone with a 777!
Once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned forever skyward
TristarSteve From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 2836 posts, RR: 23 Reply 17, posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 23617 times:
Quoting TaromA380 (Reply 14): I wonder what the capitain of the Cardiff BA777 did say about that
Keep up. Cardiff is the Major Maint Hangar for BA Widebodies.
The aircraft don't have Captains.
A new aileron is en-route from the USA, it was just quicker to rob one in the UK, than wait for the one in the States.
CityofAthens From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 18, posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 20864 times:
Crew flew back to London via LIS with TAP; Chinese aircraft was apparently under guidance from "Follow Me" car after landing; whether this contributed to the incident is something I don't know.
To say that ramp space is tight at LAD would be quite an understatement. I would imagine that the widebodies park in the section with the 747, so for an aileron to get knocked, the Hainan A346 must have been trying to park to the left of the BA 777. A bit too much speed going into that tight turn coupled with a slippery surface, I can easily see it skidding.
Wexfordflyer From Ireland, joined Jun 2009, 205 posts, RR: 0 Reply 20, posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 20595 times:
Anyone know the damage to the 340??
Sounds like someone is gonna get into the sh1t over this anyway.
This kind of links the a question I was thinking about earlier today. Recently had an incident with a ground vehicle colliding (well being driven into) an aircraft and putting a hole into the aircraft, not huge, but substantial enough. I was thinking the driver of the ground equipment could possibly lose his job, it was undeniably his fault and is obviously a very costly mistake to make. Is it likely a situation like this is a sackable offence?
Come with me, there's a place I want you to see, where the leaves are dark, I've got a hiding place in central park.
VV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 3853 posts, RR: 20 Reply 21, posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 17966 times:
Quoting TaromA380 (Reply 14): I wonder what the capitain of the Cardiff BA777 did say about that
Quoting SBON (Reply 15): Any 777s at CWL are undergoing heavy maintenance or cabin fittings and able to provide spare parts if needed quickly. BA don't operate any scheduled flights to CWL, let alone with a 777!
Currently these include two 772s that have been recently delivered to BA and are at BAMC for cabin furbishment. The second of these, G-YMMT , only arrived at CWL on delivery from Paine Field on Friday last. It is not due in service for several weeks. By that time a further 772, G-YMMU that I believe was rolled out onto the Boeing flight line at PAE in full BA livery on Saturday having made its maiden flight on 17 June before it was painted, will be at BAMC. So there is no great urgency to get a spare from Boeing.
GKirk From United Kingdom (Scotland), joined Jun 2000, 23860 posts, RR: 69 Reply 23, posted (5 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 13569 times:
Quoting LHR27C (Reply 16): Any 777s at CWL are undergoing heavy maintenance or cabin fittings and able to provide spare parts if needed quickly. BA don't operate any scheduled flights to CWL, let alone with a 777!
Quoting TristarSteve (Reply 17): Keep up. Cardiff is the Major Maint Hangar for BA Widebodies.
Chaps, I think you've misunderstood his joke
When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
Flylku From United States, joined Apr 2006, 416 posts, RR: 0 Reply 26, posted (5 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 6418 times:
Quoting Wowpeter (Reply 25): hahaha... I would have thought so... I wonder do airline has no claim bonus... hahaha... anyway, I think it will be an insurance claim.
So would we see the captain of the 777 and 346 standing out on the ramp exchanging insurance information? Or maybe the captain from the 346 said "Hey, let's not report this. I know somebody who does great body work, cheap."
HAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 27824 posts, RR: 61 Reply 27, posted (5 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4614 times:
Quoting TristarSteve (Reply 8): The Chinese A340 was taxying too fast onto a parking area and was 18m off the centre line, when it skidded on skydrol contaminated ground.
Isn't there a clean up at the Airports for a fluid spillage?
regds
MEL...
Quoting Wowpeter (Reply 25): hahaha... I would have thought so... I wonder do airline has no claim bonus... hahaha... anyway, I think it will be an insurance claim.
I don't think we have a no claims bonus. After the incident with G-YMMM at LHR last January.
Quoting Pawsleykat (Reply 9): Quoting TristarSteve (Reply 8):
The BA needs an aileron, which has now been robbed from a BA B777 at Cardiff.
At least BA have managed to get a spare Aileron in time. Good ol' BAMC Silly
G-YMMM was broken up and parted out. With parts been sent to BAMC. Maybe the aileron from this aircraft was the one sent to LAD.
BAW217 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2007, 80 posts, RR: 0 Reply 31, posted (5 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3937 times:
Quoting BALHRWWCC (Reply 29): G-YMMM was broken up and parted out. With parts been sent to BAMC. Maybe the aileron from this aircraft was the one sent to LAD.
The 777 L/H Aileron assembly came to LHR from LAX on a BA service, it was put on a truck to Ostend then went on a British Global (MK Airlines) scheduled flight to LAD via TIP.
AirNZ From United Kingdom (Northern Ireland), joined Feb 2005, 3119 posts, RR: 14 Reply 32, posted (5 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3566 times:
Quoting BAW217 (Reply 31): The 777 L/H Aileron assembly came to LHR from LAX on a BA service, it was put on a truck to Ostend then went on a British Global (MK Airlines) scheduled flight to LAD via TIP.
The part(s) arrived there yesterday.
What happened to the parts which were reportedly sent from Cardiff to save time?
BALHRWWCC From United Kingdom (England), joined Dec 2007, 670 posts, RR: 1 Reply 33, posted (5 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3567 times:
BA would never take the part of the two new aircraft that are currently in CWL. From what I have been told in the last hour or so BAW217 is right. A new aileron was sent from LAX to go to LAD.
LHR27C From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 1200 posts, RR: 26 Reply 34, posted (5 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3340 times:
Quoting BALHRWWCC (Reply 33): BA would never take the part of the two new aircraft that are currently in CWL
Doesn't have to be one of the new ones surely? Other 777s at CWL all the time for C/D checks, for which a missing aileron is not the end of the world for a couple of days if it gets a stranded aircraft back into service quicker. Anyway, it sounds like plans changed (they often do in these situations).
Once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned forever skyward
AirNZ From United Kingdom (Northern Ireland), joined Feb 2005, 3119 posts, RR: 14 Reply 35, posted (5 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2929 times:
Quoting BALHRWWCC (Reply 33): From what I have been told in the last hour or so BAW217 is right.
I wasn't remotely suggesting that anyone isn't right. I asked what happened to the aileron that was sent from Cardiff as there was no great urgency to expedite one from Boeing, or why wasn't it used if it was sent?
VV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 3853 posts, RR: 20 Reply 40, posted (5 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1514 times:
Quoting Valley1 (Reply 36): To the best of my knowledge no parts from MMM were ever sent to BAMC
MMM no longer belongs to BA. The BA Annual Report 2008-09 details a payment received by BA for the aircraft from its insurers. It was £63 million. This was a credit in the report.
The debit was a write-off of the book value of MMM, £60 million. The difference between the two figures is probably to cover other costs associated with the accident.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States, joined Dec 2005, 5154 posts, 
From Namibia, joined Feb 2004, 3429 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2008, 135 posts, 
From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 2836 posts, .gif){kind=small}
From United Kingdom (Scotland), joined Jul 2005, 1816 posts, 
From Germany, joined exactly 10 years ago today! 
, 6945 posts, 
From Romania, joined Sep 2005, 301 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Denmark, joined May 2001, 4916 posts, 
From Ireland, joined Jun 2009, 205 posts, 
From France, joined Oct 2001, 1956 posts, 
From Hong Kong SAR, PRC, joined Oct 2006, 111 posts, 
From India, joined Jan 2001, 27824 posts, .gif){kind=small}
From United Kingdom (England), joined Sep 2003, 8744 posts, 
From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 5486 posts, .gif){kind=small}
From United Kingdom (Northern Ireland), joined Feb 2005, 3119 posts, .gif){kind=small}
From United Kingdom (Wales), joined Apr 2006, 4 posts, 
From Austria, joined Nov 2004, 849 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
){kind=link}