Aa777flyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1907 times:
Ya I agree with DutchJet. That is totally lame. Like they show a DC-10 on takeoff then landing on a S80 or something like that. Or they show a DC10 exterior with a 747 interior....Whats Up With That? Dont movie directors go out and study airplanes?
By the way...are there any good airplane movies comming up soon. I thinks its about time...
AerLingus From China, joined Mar 2000, 2371 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (14 years 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1905 times:
I think I've said it once and I'll say it again: 'Pushing Tin' was the last good plane movie. The Delta jet in the movie matched, interior and exterior, but in the scene where Nick Falzone goes berserk with paranoia on the jet, in one scene, the plane was a 767 or an A-310, but the jet that they showed approaching overhead was a T-tail.
I myself am thinking of writing a little script revolving around a long-haul pilot who has to take a job with a rural milk-run line after he gets laid off in a merger.
CO Cargo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1896 times:
You were watching the Dukes of Hazzard? Duuuude.
I posted this topic about a week ago and got about 2 replies, it's been covered before. But I did have one thought today pertaining to the subject: why do producers have to insert the sound of the wheels as they hit the runway during a landing? I've probably watched a million jets land from various vantage points, and you cannot hear the sound like you can in a Cessna.