Aio86 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 929 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted
Sun Apr 22 2001 08:12:58 UTC (14 years 10 months 11 hours ago) and read 1319 times:
Now that a lot of airlines are publishing timetables in computer format, they don't bother to spend money printing them.
I don't think that they will ever do a paper version.
Although it might be a possibility, all members except for Varig already have one printed.
Jiml1126 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted
Sun Apr 22 2001 08:36:37 UTC (14 years 10 months 11 hours ago) and read 1312 times:
I think it might save airlines lots of money if they publish the timetable together.
VirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4579 posts, RR: 36
Reply 3, posted
Sun Apr 22 2001 08:47:44 UTC (14 years 10 months 11 hours ago) and read 1307 times:
OAG - Updated Monthly. What else do you need... Unfortunately, it costs $$$
"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
SailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted
Sun Apr 22 2001 10:04:53 UTC (14 years 10 months 9 hours ago) and read 1288 times:
I just have LH's new timetable in front of me.....I think if there was a combined Star timetable I would have trouble carrying it around
GOT From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 1912 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted
Sun Apr 22 2001 10:49:09 UTC (14 years 10 months 9 hours ago) and read 1277 times:
It's quite easy to use a timetable for only one airline because they have so many codeshares and that's enough unless your not going to a little town without codesharing.
Just like birdwatching - without having to be so damned quiet!
Rafabozzolla From Brazil, joined Apr 2000, 1388 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted
Sun Apr 22 2001 15:35:41 UTC (14 years 10 months 4 hours ago) and read 1256 times:
I have the Star timetable downloaded in my computer. Unfortunately there are no code shared flights.