Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Emirates Urges More Scrutiny Of Airline Alliances  
User currently offlineAvek00 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4336 posts, RR: 19
Posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3104 times:

BRUSSELS, July 28 (Reuters) - The European Union should scrutinise more closely the competitive advantage enjoyed by transatlantic airline alliances to ensure they do not violate antitrust rules, Emirates Airlines said late on Monday.

Airlines that spent years ramping up their international operations have been hit by the recession that has hammered demand for overseas travel. In response, many major airlines are forging partnerships that allow them to cut costs and capacity.

But such airline alliances and growing government support for consolidation to avert corporate failures, could have an adverse long-term impact on independent airlines, Andrew Parker, a senior vice president at Dubai-based Emirates, told Reuters.

http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idCALS52724220090728?rpc=44


Live life to the fullest.
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17329 posts, RR: 46
Reply 1, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3080 times:



Quoting Avek00 (Thread starter):
The European Union should scrutinise more closely the competitive advantage enjoyed by transatlantic airline alliances to ensure they do not violate antitrust rules, Emirates Airlines said late on Monday.

Wow...EK has a lot of chutzpah



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineIncitatus From Brazil, joined Feb 2005, 4000 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3057 times:

How about "Airline Alliances Urge more Scrutiny of Emirates"?  Wink

This is ridonculous!


User currently offlineKiwiandrew From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 8539 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3057 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would think that EK would be wary of making attacks like this as they could draw the investigators attention to themselves. There are more than a few players out there who consider that EK indulges in capacity dumping which can also be considered anti-competitive if it forces competition out of the market .

[Edited 2009-07-28 07:33:17]


Moderation in all things ... including moderation ;-)
User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7383 posts, RR: 17
Reply 4, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2985 times:

This EK statement seems to me to be just publicity posturing. I cannot believe that they are not already aware that the EU investigations it demands are already underway:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/anti...ions/39595/opening_proceedings.pdf

There is also a not yet completed EU investigation into Skyteam that dates back as far as 2005 or 2006. So although the above document talks of "priority", do not hold your breath!


User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1603 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2952 times:

seems a pretty fair statement from EK to me. There has to be some impact on competition from airline alliances, hasn't there?

alliances could become monopolistic if left unchecked, couldn't they?


User currently offlineSInGAPORE_AIR From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13738 posts, RR: 19
Reply 6, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2902 times:

Not a surprise considering they got their hands on that 'confidential' Star Alliance presentation which posed various ways that member airlines could "deal" with Emirates.


Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineJoeljack From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 933 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2849 times:



Quoting SInGAPORE_AIR (Reply 6):
Not a surprise considering they got their hands on that 'confidential' Star Alliance presentation which posed various ways that member airlines could "deal" with Emirates.

Interesting...can this presentation be found any where or is it still confidential to Star and 'Emirates' now.


User currently offlineSInGAPORE_AIR From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13738 posts, RR: 19
Reply 8, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2830 times:



Quoting Joeljack (Reply 7):
can this presentation be found any where

Unfortunately it eludes me. I've not seen it anywhere  Sad



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineLightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12871 posts, RR: 100
Reply 9, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2763 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I half wonder if this is a bow shot to AC & LH over Canadian?German access bilateral rights?

Quoting SInGAPORE_AIR (Reply 6):
Not a surprise considering they got their hands on that 'confidential' Star Alliance presentation which posed various ways that member airlines could "deal" with Emirates.

If true, that is a huge find for EK. Say what you will about them, this gives them a leg up.

It behoves EK to keep the spotlight on the alliances. This could get very interesting!  box 

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineLipeGIG From Brazil, joined May 2005, 11416 posts, RR: 59
Reply 10, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2665 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR



Quoting Avek00 (Thread starter):
BRUSSELS, July 28 (Reuters) - The European Union should scrutinise more closely the competitive advantage enjoyed by transatlantic airline alliances to ensure they do not violate antitrust rules, Emirates Airlines said late on Monday.



Quoting Incitatus (Reply 2):
How about "Airline Alliances Urge more Scrutiny of Emirates"? Wink

This is ridonculous!

Well, this is because they become too big that airlines and specially alliances begin to be bother by EK. This for sure is the begin of a non-disclosed war of EK against alliances and probably vice-versa.



New York + Rio de Janeiro = One of the best combinations !
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17329 posts, RR: 46
Reply 11, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2634 times:



Quoting Lightsaber (Reply 9):
I half wonder if this is a bow shot to AC & LH over Canadian?German access bilateral rights?

I'm not sure. EK needs Canada and Germany much more than their respective carriers need DXB.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineAvek00 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4336 posts, RR: 19
Reply 12, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2593 times:



Quoting LipeGIG (Reply 10):
Well, this is because they become too big that airlines and specially alliances begin to be bother by EK. This for sure is the begin of a non-disclosed war of EK against alliances and probably vice-versa.

Oh the war has been ongoing for years, and involves more players than just EK (and other Mideast airlines + SQ) vs. "the alliances" -- national governments have gotten involved in a big way, too. The USA, UK, and India have been essentially running negotiators around the globe over the past 3-5 years to sign Open Skies deals with most any country in large part to counter the threat posed by third-country air carriers.



Live life to the fullest.
User currently offlineLightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12871 posts, RR: 100
Reply 13, posted (4 years 12 months 1 day ago) and read 2500 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 11):
EK needs Canada and Germany much more than their respective carriers need DXB.

No doubt. But both have been very resistive to new slots for Dubai (EK). But there is a reason I phrased 'half wonder.' I'm very unsure as EK seems to be getting more 'testy' in the press. I hope that is part of a strategy and not being reactive...

Quoting LipeGIG (Reply 10):
This for sure is the begin of a non-disclosed war of EK against alliances and probably vice-versa.

Nitpick: In my opinion this 'war' has been going on for at least two years. EK has won some battles (e.g., vs. AF to India), but lost others (more Canadian bilateral rights).

I really hope the PowerPoint by *A is just an urban myth. If they were silly enough to do that, it gives ammo to every non-alliance airline to go after the alliances. It has seemed that *A has something against EK for a bit...

Is it just me, or is EK trying FR's tactic to put themselves in the spotlight any way they can? The old 'I do not care what you write about me, just make sure you spell my name correctly.'

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineLipeGIG From Brazil, joined May 2005, 11416 posts, RR: 59
Reply 14, posted (4 years 12 months 23 hours ago) and read 2364 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR



Quoting Avek00 (Reply 12):
Oh the war has been ongoing for years, and involves more players than just EK (and other Mideast airlines + SQ) vs. "the alliances" -- national governments have gotten involved in a big way, too. The USA, UK, and India have been essentially running negotiators around the globe over the past 3-5 years to sign Open Skies deals with most any country in large part to counter the threat posed by third-country air carriers.



Quoting Lightsaber (Reply 13):
Nitpick: In my opinion this 'war' has been going on for at least two years. EK has won some battles (e.g., vs. AF to India), but lost others (more Canadian bilateral rights).

Agree, but during the past years, the economic growing and the global boom, specially in India, China and other countries may have reduce arguments as there was room and market for everyone.
Now that the market become more disputed, and the economy is not doing so well world wide, this brings a more serious issue among the carriers and/or alliances.



New York + Rio de Janeiro = One of the best combinations !
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
History Of Airline Alliances posted Sun Oct 23 2005 23:20:26 by Cadet57
The Reality Of Airline Alliances posted Tue Sep 27 2005 23:42:15 by Airzim
Scrutiny Of Airline-maintenance Firms Grows posted Mon Apr 11 2005 16:26:25 by Luv2fly
Future Of Airline Alliances posted Wed Sep 25 2002 11:49:57 by StarFlyer
Future Members Of Airline Alliances? posted Mon Apr 30 2001 23:02:16 by Srbmod
The Future Of Airline Alliances posted Thu Nov 9 2000 02:40:27 by Caribb
No More Pics Of Airline Logos Please posted Mon Jun 5 2000 04:04:14 by Administrator
Emirates Delivery Of Airline's First Two 773ers posted Mon Mar 28 2005 22:37:40 by Squirrel83
US DOJ/DOT Clash Over Airline Alliances posted Sun Jul 26 2009 06:46:54 by MasseyBrown
Emirates Expanding More In 2009 posted Mon Dec 29 2008 11:34:11 by Behramjee