Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Are ERJ-145 And CRJ-200 Still Cost Effective?  
User currently offlineLPSHobby From Brazil, joined May 2007, 304 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6064 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

what is your opinions abou that?

best wishes from Brazil !!!

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineNorCal From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2459 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6014 times:

Only on certain regional routes where there is little to no competition so you can charge several hundred dollars for a one way ticket. A lot also depends on the cost of gas. When oil was over $100 a barrel I doubt there were many routes that made money. I've heard that when oil is below $50 a barrel RJs can usually make money, don't have anything to back that up besides what I've heard. Of course there are a lot of variables and it's pretty hard to come up with a set of conditions that guarentee a profit everytime for RJs (or any plane).

A lot depends on the CASM of the regional airline flying the route. Pinnacle, Mesa, GoJet etc. can run a flights a lot cheaper than Skywest, ASA, Horizon, etc.

In general routes like ORD-JFK, SFO-LAX, etc. are probably in the red for RJs. While routes flown from major hubs to cities you've never heard of probably are profitable. The best chance for profit in a RJ is probably a small city with one airline, 1-2 flights a day, over 500 nm from the hub. Shorter than 500nm would be best served by a turbo prop.

User currently offlineBrains From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 262 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 5635 times:

At my airline, we operate no hub to hub flights, in fact we operate few flights from our hubs to any of the larger airports in the eastern US. This is for exactly the reasons NorCal explained above. Its more profitable for our parent company to operate mainline flights on modern larger aircraft, carrying more passengers for not terribly different burns. Whereas we can carry a full RJ from any one of our hubs to some dinky little outstation and make a buck, therefore make a buck for our parent company/codeshare partner. It comes down to a cost per seatmile thing. Big plane with a lot of empty seats is probably going to lose you some money. A full 50 seat RJ to our little middle of nowhere outstation (once a day even better, can you say increased ticket prices) is going to do you a lot better. Of course heavier you're going to burn more fuel, but its not going to make a hell of a lot of difference at the end of the day as long as the plane is full and you're not giving the tickets away.

User currently offline9252fly From Canada, joined Sep 2005, 1428 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 5540 times:

It's extremely hard to determine the answer to this question as it's very complex. Mainline carriers outsource a lot of flying to various small jet operators,not so much to make a point to point route profitable,but rather make the entire network profitable. An example would be where they can fly a passenger from a small station to a hub with a connection on to the mainline carrier's longhaul international flight. On it's own the regional flight may not have generated a profit but it did for the network. That's may explain why certain regional routes operate and others do not,it's what the route provides in connection passengers to the network. The point to point customers on these regional routes are the gravy. I can think of one major airline that never cared too much for the O&D market on regional routes and would terminate the service unless it was providing passengers for the entire network,sounds crazy,but there you have it.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Economics Of ERJ-145 Vs CRJ-200 posted Mon Nov 12 2007 19:26:09 by PiedmontINT
Difference Between CRJ-100 And CRJ-200? posted Mon Jul 26 2004 23:18:57 by BCAInfoSys
Selling Prices For DC9 And CRJ-200 posted Thu Feb 13 2003 20:09:21 by Propilotjw
ERJ 135/145 Vs. CRJ-100/200 posted Wed Jun 19 2002 05:20:46 by 762er
Bombardier And Embrear (-200/-145) posted Wed May 27 2009 08:33:13 by FlyASAGuy2005
Is The ERJ-145 Still Good (profitable)? posted Mon May 4 2009 07:15:26 by LPSHobby
ERJ And CRJ Question? posted Wed Dec 5 2007 20:23:06 by Adman737
ERJ And CRJ, Size Difference posted Sun Feb 11 2007 04:25:10 by AirWillie6475
CRJ 200 Strip And Repaint Question posted Wed Dec 13 2006 22:57:00 by Fardoche66
How Much Does An ERJ-145 Cost? posted Fri Nov 10 2006 16:16:25 by Hido28