Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CO 764 Makes An Emergency Landing In Brazil.  
User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3231 times:

According to Just Planes N59053 flying from the US to Rio made an emergency landing in Manaus (Brazil) on the 25th.

What Happened ??

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAdam84 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1400 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3124 times:

Yeah I wonder what happened also. Its kind of strange that this happened on Wednesday but there has been no word of anything.

User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3110 times:

Problem with the 764 ???, keeping it low key ????

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineChepos From Puerto Rico, joined Dec 2000, 6235 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3086 times:

Havent heard anythig yet.
Chepos
Puerto Rico



Fly the Flag!!!!
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16907 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3035 times:

Maybe it wasn't reported because it was an ill or unruley passenger which made them divert.

Usualy when an aircraft has to make an unscheduled landing and it doesn't get widely reported it's because of non mechanical issues like an ill or unruley passenger.

Some unruley passenger incidents draw lots of attention,like those sisters on the UAL flight that diverted to Anchorage last week wouldn't have got all the media coverage if the incident wasn't video taped.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3033 times:

Planes divert more than you think. Sick passenger, dead passenger, unruly passenger (like those two
bitches on the San Francisco to Shanghai flight).
Some of these are unscheduled landings, and not
necessarily emergency landings.

ContinentalEWR


User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2998 times:

It was quoted as an Emergency landing.

User currently offlineCoAir@IAH From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 271 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2903 times:

OK,
You'd have to think that if it were something serious, you would have heard more by now. No news is either good news or a conspiracy!

There is nothing wrong with the 764.


User currently offlineTurbulence From Spain, joined Nov 1999, 963 posts, RR: 20
Reply 8, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2895 times:

CoAir@IAH:
Nobody said there's anythiing wrong with the 764s. The word conspiracy has been brought by yourself. Do not be childish, OK? Sometimes airplanes have problems. Sometimes, even, to our disgrace, they crash. That's all. But this is not the point: if every type having had problems had been grounded, today this site would not exist, because there would not be any a/c on the air any longer.

By the way: what's the history about the sisters on the flight SFO-SHA?
or, is there any other about this subject?

Best turbulences


User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2885 times:

Actually, if you read this thread carefully, Turbulence, Hkgspotter1 in his 2nd post says "Problems with the 764? Keeping it low-key?" That statement by Hkg wasn't very bright. Without any information, he's making a mountain out of a molehill. Unfortunately, too many people on airline boards hear of one maintaince problem with a certain kind of aircraft, or a certain kind of aircraft has an accident, and they go nuts wondering "what's wrong with that aircraft". As far as I'm concerened, COAir@IAH was just responding to that when you jumped down his/her throat. Lighten up a little.

User currently offline777kicksass From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2000, 668 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2866 times:

Can someone explain what the sisters did on the SFO-SHA flight?? I haven't heard about that.

User currently offlineAdam84 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1400 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2856 times:

The twin sisters first were arguing, then cussing. They assaulted a few f/a's and the pilot (maybe co-pilot), a few news articles said they were smoking on the plane too but Im not sure about that, the plane then flew back to Anchorage and they were arrested. The plane, crew and all the passengers had to stay in Anchorage for 22 hours because the crew had to rest. They got a nice glacier tour out of it though.

User currently offlineTurbulence From Spain, joined Nov 1999, 963 posts, RR: 20
Reply 12, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2846 times:

Sorry, Alpha1, you're right. I skipped that sentence. Anyway, another childish one. But again, one emergency landing on one airplane DOES NOT MEAN a problem with that airplane, and much less, with the whole series of the same type.

My mistake. One of the consequences of maybe reading too quickly. But also a consequence of too many "hot blooded" posts in favor or against something or someone...

If you read other posts of mine, you'll see that I am one of the ones trying to settle arguments for my opinions, or giving reasons for any subject. I do not criticize just for the pleasure of provoking, and I think you can admit that, if you skip Hkgspotter1's post as I did, CoAir@IAH's is not a very wise one. The truth, though, after all, is that, maybe, the worst sentence is the first one.
My apologies.

Best turbulences.


User currently offlineSA365C1 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2001, 131 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2816 times:

Couldn't have been too much of a problem as this aircraft as I post is on its way back to Newark after operating the CO016/7 EWR-GLA-EWR run

User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (13 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2812 times:

Do you know the word J O K E ????

Its OK for everyone to joke about the `Euro Trash' but whats wrong with a joke on Boeing ???



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Continental Jet Makes Emergency Landing In Brazil posted Fri Jun 15 2001 13:09:33 by Jourdan747
Varig MD-11 Makes An Emergency Landing At REC posted Mon Aug 1 2005 20:04:58 by EMBTucano
CX A343 Makes An Emergency Landing At LHR! posted Wed May 11 2005 15:41:30 by Chris78cpr
DJ Flight Makes An Emergency Landing At SYD posted Wed Dec 1 2004 22:50:13 by Bill142
AF 2390 CDG-IST Makes An Emergency Landing At BUD posted Mon Aug 30 2004 23:15:58 by Robcol99
New York Islanders A/c Makes An Emergency Landing posted Fri Jan 30 2004 03:22:08 by Jcs17
UPS 757 Makes An Emergency Landing At PHX posted Wed Sep 17 2003 07:40:00 by WesternDC1010
AA Just Did An Emergency Landing In PHX posted Fri Nov 3 2000 19:26:47 by VX320
ATA 727 Makes An Emergency Landing At IND... posted Thu Apr 13 2000 06:12:35 by ATA757
TWA MD-80 Makes An Emergency Landing... posted Sat Feb 12 2000 14:57:42 by TWA318