Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
WN Places Embargo On FedEx Non Rev Travel  
User currently offlineJetBlue From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 393 posts, RR: 5
Posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 23481 times:

To all employees:

"Over the past several months, we have seen a significant increase in pass irregularities from other airline employees. Unfortunately, the most recent event was covered extensively by the media; and as it turns out, it was a nonrevenue pass rider. Pass privileges are just that, a privilege, and can be suspended or taken away if we see abuse. Therefore, effective immediately, and for an undetermined amount of time, FedEx nonrevenue travelers with a ticket issue date later than August 28 will not be eligible for nonrevenue travel on Southwest Airlines. Because tickets were issued prior to the expiration date, please continue to accept the tickets that are currently in circulation for the next 90 days. Please understand that we very rarely embargo an entire carrier due to pass abuse; however, the severity and the cost to the Company of the most recent event warrants this punitive action.

Although travel privileges on Southwest Airlines have been suspended for FedEx employees, this in no way affects the discount Southwest Employees have with FedEx."


I've heard of individuals losing their non-rev benefits but never a whole company. Anyone else ever heard of something like this? And anyone know of what other irregularities that have occured besides the infamous big naked dude that caused the diversion?


We know for you it's not just a seat on a flight to a place. It's a seat on a flight to your life.
116 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineAtlwest1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 1046 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 23161 times:

The only thing i can think of is that there was a rash of incidents involving FedEx employees. Usually the companies just notify the offending company and that individual is dealt with. Its crap like this that ruins Non-rev travel for the rest of us. People need to understand it is not a right it is a privilege and you need to uphold yourself and your companion as well to a standard HIGHER then the average passenger, particularly if its not even your own company. Hopefully the issue can be resolved and the Fedex employees will be able to continue to ride because for alot of there pilots they use Southwest and a host of other carriers to commute let alone travel for leisure.


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co. or Airt
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 23129 times:

There was another thread on this last week started by FXRamper..... I can't seem to find it though....


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineKL911 From Ireland, joined Jul 2003, 5113 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 23090 times:

Why continue the nonrev thing anyway in this economic climate? Shouldn't we save fuel and not fly for free? The least we can do is buy a paid ticket on our own airline right?


Next trip : DUB-AUH-CGK-DPS-KUL-AUH-CDG-ORK :-)
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 23075 times:



Quoting KL911 (Reply 3):

I have actually supported bringing back the service charge fees on our own airlines for a while now. When I was working at AS, it used to be $8 OW in coach and $25 OW in FC.

I think it is time to bring them back.... This is another way to cover some of the costs to occupy open seats....



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 23027 times:



Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 2):
There was another thread on this last week started by FXRamper..... I can't seem to find it though....

I think it was deleted because it was unverified, i.e. he wouldn't (and undoubted couldn't) re-post the internal memo he received. Now that someone has re-posted what was on SWA's employee site, the cat's out of the bag and it's thus confirmed.


User currently offlineStratosphere From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 1651 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 22961 times:



Quoting JetBlue (Thread starter):
I've heard of individuals losing their non-rev benefits but never a whole company

It is more than likley the thug "hubites" that thow boxes in the hub that are cauing the trouble..FedEx used to pre 9/11 allow all employees to ride the jumpseat even in the cockpit. I heard a funny story from a co-worker that some woman who worked in the hub sat in the F/E's seat and when the second officer did his walk around and came back she wouldn't let him have the seat she said "uh uh this is my seat" lol..I know the pilots are glad that jumpseat was taken away from all but those who hold an airman cert..



NWA THE TRUE EVIL EMPIRE
User currently offlineAAAL From United States of America, joined Apr 2009, 127 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 22930 times:

Wow, now that is bad. Any idea what did the fedex guy do?

User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 8, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 22905 times:



Quoting AAAL (Reply 7):
Any idea what did the fedex guy do?

From what FXRamper said in his original thread was that two employees pitched a fit to a gate agent. I have seen CO employees pitching a fit at the gate in SEA before trying to non-rev on AS to JNU many, many times.....

It is not the first time something similar to this has happened, nor will it be the last time. Common Sense prevails.....



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 22877 times:



Quoting AAAL (Reply 7):
Wow, now that is bad. Any idea what did the fedex guy do?

As mentioned in the news coverage, he exposed himself to a female passenger, and also took off all his clothes before being restrained. The OAK-LAS flight turned around and went back to OAK.


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 10, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 22777 times:



Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 9):
As mentioned in the news coverage, he exposed himself to a female passenger, and also took off all his clothes before being restrained. The OAK-LAS flight turned around and went back to OAK.

I thought that was a totally different situation....  confused 



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineBcoz From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 367 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 22753 times:



Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 9):

As mentioned in the news coverage, he exposed himself to a female passenger, and also took off all his clothes before being restrained. The OAK-LAS flight turned around and went back to OAK.

Wow! The dude that did that was a non-rev? Ouch!

bcoz


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 22711 times:



Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 10):

I thought that was a totally different situation....

Indeed, two different situations, and I can't recall which one happened second so as to be the straw that broke the camel's back...

Quoting Bcoz (Reply 11):
Wow! The dude that did that was a non-rev? Ouch!

.

Unfortunate that the actions of a minority punish the majority, but what can one say?


User currently offlineSwa4life From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 384 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 22598 times:

I'm not sure why FedEx is hitching rides on WN anyways. So let me get this straight. FedEx employees are getting flights on Southwest, and Southwest employees are getting 10% off ground shipping? And to top it off, these strokes are trying to play games and exploit something?


Take a hike FedEx..


User currently offlineYVPHX From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 248 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 22538 times:

That is unfortunate for Southwest employees that they only get 10% off on shipping. I get 65% I and I work for the worst airline in the world..

User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3114 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 22495 times:

Quoting Swa4life (Reply 13):
FedEx employees are getting flights on Southwest, and Southwest employees are getting 10% off ground shipping?

FedEx offers a 75% off industry wide discount.

[Edited 2009-09-08 13:10:37]


FLYi
User currently offlineSwa4life From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 384 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 22466 times:

It may not be 10%, I'm not totally sure to be honest. But whatever it is I'll gladly trade it in to be able to ride with the boxes on a FedEx flight.

User currently offlinePWMRamper From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 606 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 22435 times:



Quoting KL911 (Reply 3):
Why continue the nonrev thing anyway in this economic climate? Shouldn't we save fuel and not fly for free? The least we can do is buy a paid ticket on our own airline right?

Is the fuel for flying an extra 200 pounds significant?

Do dispatchers really look and say, "Oh, there's 147 instead of 146 passengers, better throw on more fuel"?


To me it seems that extra 200 pounds is insignificant and it costs the airline absolutely nothing.


But maybe they DO actually take that extra passenger into account when getting fuel costs, and if I'm dead wrong, correct me.


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 18, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 22434 times:



Quoting Swa4life (Reply 13):
...FedEx employees are getting flights on Southwest...

Are we talking about ANY FedEx employee or just the ones who work airport ops?



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineSwa4life From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 384 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 22173 times:



Quoting KL911 (Reply 3):
Why continue the nonrev thing anyway in this economic climate? Shouldn't we save fuel and not fly for free? The least we can do is buy a paid ticket on our own airline right?

Because nonrev travel, for the most part, is what makes working for an airline attractive. If they took that away, they'd better start paying us much better  Wink


User currently offlineRichierich From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 4233 posts, RR: 6
Reply 20, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 22172 times:



Quoting PWMRamper (Reply 17):
To me it seems that extra 200 pounds is insignificant and it costs the airline absolutely nothing.

Well its not "nothing"... besides the incremental fuel costs (depending on plane type and number of passengers, it is likely into the several $ range for an average transcon), there are also the added time of adding reservations, clearing the standbys at the gate, plus any drinks/food that the airline may offer. It all adds up.

Look, I'm not advocating that airlines start charging their own employees for flights (its sort of a slap in the face I think) but you've got to call a spade a spade. It's not free.



None shall pass!!!!
User currently offlineCle757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 1119 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 22095 times:



Quoting Swa4life (Reply 19):
Why continue the nonrev thing anyway in this economic climate? Shouldn't we save fuel and not fly for free? The least we can do is buy a paid ticket on our own airline right?

Its a trade off for low pay (at some airlines) working nights, holidays weekends etc etc.



Cleveland the best location in the Nation
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17278 posts, RR: 46
Reply 22, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 22065 times:



Quoting KL911 (Reply 3):
Why continue the nonrev thing anyway in this economic climate?

It's part of the employees' compensation. Nonrev benefits already allow the industry to pay substandard wages (combined with the value of travel benefits it should be more equal), so a cut to those benefits is a cut in compensation.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 23, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 22026 times:



Quoting Richierich (Reply 20):
Look, I'm not advocating that airlines start charging their own employees for flights...

The airlines had removed the service fee charges for employees on their own airline after 9/11. Again, I'd welcome the surcharges back. Not everything is free....



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineRichierich From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 4233 posts, RR: 6
Reply 24, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 21884 times:



Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 23):
The airlines had removed the service fee charges for employees on their own airline after 9/11. Again, I'd welcome the surcharges back. Not everything is free....

That's fine - and your opinion. I'm sure plenty of people don't agree with this opinion, such as myself, but it doesn't matter what we think of it.



None shall pass!!!!
25 N200WN : For the record, Pilots and Dispatchers riding jumpseat are not included in the embargo.
26 Dvincent : I thought FedEx changed their nonrev policies after FX 705 such that jumpseating by FX employees became very difficult to do? Unfortunately my memory
27 YOWza : Dead wrong! When CX started running their silver bullets (shaving off 200KG/440lbs per frame) they saved HK$2.8M (US$361,000) per year. That was at M
28 Swa4life : Who exactly does the embargo apply to then?
29 PITops : Anyone using the Fedex nonrev passes that are issued for WN travel. Which is usually ground workers.
30 AirframeAS : You mean airport ops workers, not the FedEx home delivery folks, right?
31 PITops : Yes. I don't think FedEx Ground employees could use those benefits. It was just for ground workers at FedEx locations at airports.
32 AirframeAS : That is what I originally thought. Thanks for the clarification....
33 N200WN : Before everyone comes down too hard on FedEx employees, note that the memo above (which, as an internal memo should not have been posted here) states
34 N200WN : It's not just for FX airport workers. I drop off items at the main FedEx shipping location in San Antonio, away from the airport, and the employees t
35 ERJ : As I understand it, all direct employees of FedEx (airport ops, delivery, corporate, etc...) have non-rev benefits with most airlines. In return, empl
36 Swa4life : I'm annoyed that FedEx ground workers were ever getting flight benefits on Southwest to begin with. Nothing personal against those particular individu
37 AirframeAS : If that is the case, then that is not necessarily fair to the rest of the airline employees. Delivery (door to door) folks are not airport workers so
38 N200WN : I'm not annoyed. The WN Pass Bureau must have thought it was a fair deal, and I like and use the discount. Overnight letters are a little higher now,
39 Swa4life : Don't you think it's a little bit uneven? What do you save, a few bucks for shipping an envelope? And these guys are getting flights that cost hundre
40 OPNLguy : I couldn't agree more!
41 PITrules : If one ships often, a 75% discount on premium shipping will be enough to outright buy a positive space ticket on WN. If anything is uneven, it is agai
42 PITops : I have never had a problem with the ones that fly thru PIT.
43 7673mech : If you don't ship a lot I suppose it would bug you. But when I send packages internationally at the holidays - I usually pay $75-200 dollars with the
44 JetBlue : First of all, I don't work for WN and this was a notice that went out to 13,000+ WN employees, along with everyone at FedEx who previously had benefi
45 Jlbmedia : A little off topic, but......dose this mean that you pay taxes on the Nonrev portion of your compensation package? If so, how is it calculated?
46 Luvfa : We pay taxes on Non-rev travel for off-line travel. We pay taxes on the buddy passes that are issued to give to friends.
47 OPNLguy : However it was disseminated at FDX aside, it was issued here as a mention in Today@SWA, a daily e-newsletter, and the prohibitions for its re-use are
48 ERJ : By that logic non-airport employees of airlines shouldn't be allowed to purchase standby travel on other airlines.... dispatchers, maintenance, accou
49 N200WN : Yes, it was sent to all WN employees, as an internal memo. I doubt this was the same letter that was sent to FedEx employees, as the context of the l
50 Lincoln : Ok, I have to ask... was that savings per frame or total? Even if the savings was per frame it's still probably not the best comparison as that 440lb
51 LHR380 : Not ALL airlines give staff free flights. HEAVILY discounted yes, but not free.
52 113312 : First off, FedEx has interline agreements for both revenue business travel as well as non-rev personal travel. Not only does FedEx send considerable b
53 Stratosphere : The embargo applies to all FedEx workers except pilots and dispatchers who use the jumpseat option and my understanding is that it is not permanent j
54 LoneStarMike : Maybe WN employees can't nonrev on FedEx flights, but there are other airline employees who can. IIRC Rebecca Shaw, the FO on Colgan 3407 commuted fr
55 727forever : How many times have you had your base involuntarily changed and thus forced to commute using your pass benefits? Talk to OH folks about how it has af
56 LTBEWR : When something goes out to many 1000's of employees at a company, there is bound to be some leaks. In this case, this disclosure does not release any
57 Silentbob : The problem there would be the US flight attendants.
58 Canoecarrier : Just my .02. In the 3+ years I worked as a CSA I had dozens of FedEx employees non-rev on the airline I used to work for. In that time I used the FX d
59 UAL747DEN : I have to admit that I only had time to read about half of the thread so if I say something that has already been said there ya go. I think I have a p
60 AirframeAS : Actually, it was. Anything I can do to help my airline generate more revenue, I would absolutely give back $10 or $25 out of my paycheck per flight.
61 MEA-707 : It's unusual that a whole company (FedEx) suffers for the actions of 2 or 3 individuals. I think there is more behind this. Probably WN feels FedEx ha
62 SPREE34 : In that case, don't post a specific figure. Who is "us"? Who do you work for, and in what capacity? Again, who is "us"? Why should you be annoyed at
63 Acelanzarote : Just wondering what if anything Fedex is doing about this? What has happened with the staff involved in the incidents? Just a shame that a few have sp
64 Bobnwa : At what airline or airlines do pilots and FA's have more travel options than CSA's? None that I know of if you exclude the jump seat.
65 Bongodog1964 : Rule 1, if you want anything to stay confidential, never put it in writing to more than a handfull of people. In the UK we have a long history of inf
66 Mcdu : I would fully support FedEx removing SWA from the shipping discount. Pretty unfair to the remaining FedEx employees to use the shotgun approach by SW
67 SPREE34 : Ding! Why start a pissing contest? The priveleges are only suspended, not discontinued. Let the two companies fix it between themselves. SWA can't ju
68 727forever : Exactly. This qualifies your statements too. I have been displaced 5 times in my career to another base and I'm still only in my 30's. Am I supposed
69 AvConsultant : This is a slippery slope and discussed in detailed last year during high fuel cost often behind close doors. If the non-rev go the non-revs go, inclu
70 Mcdu : In turn FedEx should should suspend the shipping discount to mirror the policy of SWA. I am sure there have been more than one employee from SWA that
71 SPREE34 : Why, if there have been no infractions by SWA privilege holders? I imagine they have a process for that. I'm sure, that if an SWA privelige holder st
72 Swa4life : Seems to me like It's pretty obvious that I work for Southwest,.. So it does indeed affect me.
73 F9Animal : I honestly had no idea that employees of FedEx got travel benefits. Even more shocking is that "some" of the FedEx employees abused the benefit. It is
74 Mcdu : Really? Not punishing anyone with the decision to ban ALL FedEx non-revs as a result of the stupidity of ONE employee? If that is the case then many
75 SPREE34 : I wasn't. I asked an opinion.
76 UAL747DEN : I don't care what side of this your on that is some funny S*** right there! Flashes of ExpressJet, the Omaha Hilton, and naked pilots run through my
77 OPNLguy : I've seen and heard of some stretches being made when making some "conclusions", but that one about takes the cake....
78 Atrude777 : I think the issue is, when you travel on a non rev ticket, you represent your company. Just like when our university has basketball games and such, y
79 Mcdu : Hardly, SWA has placed themselves in the inconvenient position of being in VIOLATION of the FAR's. They should have had up to 80+ airplanes grounded,
80 OPNLguy : I've heard pretty much the same thing. Likewise, whether it's true or not, the overall issue is a matter between both the companies. While folks ousi
81 N702ML : First of all, it concerns me that someone who does not even work for Southwest Airlines posted an internal memo on a very public forum. That makes me
82 Stratosphere : It is true the travel embargo was requested by FX and not imposed by SWA
83 Atrude777 : Well mcdu, there is your answer. This is why FX has not "banned" WN because FX implemented the embargo on themselves. Alex
84 Stratosphere : The only offline employees who can fly on FX are pilots and I am not sure about offline dispatchers but possibly them but no one else.
85 N702ML : I agree with you...I have also used the FedEx discount a few times. I don't use it often, but its nice to know its there when I need it. Maybe we onl
86 PITops : And Pilots. I always look forward to PHL flights when I am working the gates. YEAH!!!
87 Mcdu : Haven't anything officially posted. Only some internet chatter. Produce the memo then I will become a believer.
88 Stratosphere : You hit the nail on the head...Quite a few of the people that work here have never worked for a passenger airline before and have no idea how to non-
89 Mir : Airline employees are already helping their airlines out in the form of taking pay cuts, reduced or eliminated pensions, changing their hours, etc. A
90 N702ML : After reading all of the posts....I really think all that needs to be said has been said. Perhaps it is time to lock this thread?
91 Mcdu : We should not have negative discussions about SWA?
92 Swa4life : How did it become a negative discussion about Southwest? And if it did, perhaps it should be locked because then this topic has strayed off topic..
93 HAWK21M : I don't think that can be decided generally by an Individual....... regds MEL.
94 Silver1SWA : If you read above, official memos are not to be distributed publically so you won't find your official memo...at least you shouldn't. If you want, yo
95 Stratosphere : Take my word for it..I work at FX we have all received an e mail from upper management explaining the suspension and FX imposing the suspension and t
96 Malaysia : Funny how I hear that even airline caterers do not get flight benefits, but they pay very well and everyone gets free food anyway.
97 Swa4life : Not every airline's flight benefits package is the same. What you're referring to sounds like one specific airline's policy. You also have to remembe
98 Atrude777 : Everyone has responded for me, but since you are directing the quote to me, we cannot post internal memo anyway. Your profile says you are an airline
99 T5towbar : Wouldn't FX's pass bureau explain their employees the basics of non revving, and knowing they won't get on a flight since their priority is low? I kn
100 Fxra : From what i recall, the non-rev (or discount travel) policies were spelled out in the email bulletins boards. As an employee you were repsonsable for
101 777STL : To expand on this - FX works on a franchise model unlike UPS(where everyone is a corporate employee). "Home delivery" and "ground" are run by franchi
102 BillReid : What about pay so we can eat and have a roof?
103 BillReid : Read your interline non-rev rules. Before 9/11 it was very possible. Not sure now. You ay be able to nrsa on FedEx, but the flights are at night. In
104 SPREE34 : Alex, IF he is a pilot, his attitude that of one who missed the cut at SWA ,so he hates SWA. Or, his carrier hasn't been properly managed since 1978
105 SWABrian : mcdu, It's official, but it doesn't include the the cockpit agreement for pilots. There is no memo. Brian Lusk Southwest Airlines
106 Mayor : On your airline, maybe......never on DL. This is odd. I've never heard of an airline employee, traveling on another airline, boarding before employee
107 Skyway1 : I'd imagine the ground side receives no flight travel benefits. All Express side employees, DGO and AGFS, can non rev. Having worked in the industry
108 Bobnwa : Don't know about all airlines but you never got those boarding privalages on AA,DL or NW and I kind of doubt on any other carrier.
109 JetBlue : Exactly, and how many people posted on here that they saw the same memo or got a simliar email from FX. Someone was gonna post something saying "I he
110 Stratosphere : I am not sure what SA1 is because I believe that is a DL baording code..But at NW anything with a 1 was positive space non-revenue usually only peopl
111 Swa4life : I worked for C8 as well.
112 T5towbar : Are you an airline executive or in high management? I've always thought that SA1 (or the equivalent) was for positive space non-rev too. (The Holy Gr
113 Canoecarrier : They were treated as any other airline employee at the carrier I used to work for (not QX) . Basically, if a non-rev from QX checked in 2 min later t
114 VV701 : I guess some of us are "half full" optimists and others are "half empty" pessimists. The optimists amongst us will look at any opportunity our employ
115 Gigneil : I am pretty sure non-airport personnel at airlines get to interline as well. Well, Ground is a wholly owned subsidiary, I believe it used to be RDS.
116 Srbmod : At this point, the thread has run its' course and the discussion has veered away from the topic. This thread is now locked. Any posts that appear afte
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Question For ORD United Emps On NON-REV Travel posted Sat Feb 11 2006 03:40:38 by N8334W
Non-rev Travel On El Al posted Fri Aug 26 2005 23:52:22 by Captover
Do Airlines Pay For Non-Rev Travel? posted Wed Jun 11 2008 01:50:09 by Mir
US Airways Non-Rev Travel & Their 1-800 # posted Sat Sep 1 2007 23:03:17 by VikingA346
VS And BA Non Rev Travel posted Mon Aug 27 2007 01:23:48 by Chepos
Non Rev Travel / CX Load Info posted Sun Feb 4 2007 16:04:02 by BAStew
BA Embargo On Other Airline Staff Travel? posted Sun Jan 28 2007 00:22:16 by FlyEmirates
SK Loads For Non-rev Travel posted Wed Jul 12 2006 23:29:14 by Beowulf
Non-Rev Travel In The Middle East posted Thu Feb 2 2006 14:38:25 by 757ops
Non-rev Travel posted Mon Jun 10 2002 19:40:45 by Luvflng