Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
STR Airport Closed Due F100 Emergency Landing  
User currently offlineMH017 From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 1692 posts, RR: 30
Posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 14932 times:

KLC F100 cannot depart as airport closed !!!

Any news ?


don't throw away tomorrow !
56 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4857 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 14934 times:

According to German TV a F100 coming from TXL on its belly...either a gear-up landing or a collapsed gear during the landing. Pax have been evacuated.

User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4857 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 14918 times:

Just showed pictures...Contact Air F100 with a collapsed MLG. Doesn't look too dramatic, but since STR has only one runway this is gonna take a while.

User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4857 posts, RR: 20
Reply 3, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 14885 times:

No injuries, German politician Franz Müntefering was on board.

[Edited 2009-09-14 02:43:15]

User currently offlineN14AZ From Germany, joined Feb 2007, 2840 posts, RR: 25
Reply 4, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 14810 times:

A picture of the F 100 can be seen here: http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/2009/09...ntefering/flughafen-stuttgart.html

Edit: I think it's D-AFKE (no picture in our database).

[Edited 2009-09-14 03:00:10]

User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9746 posts, RR: 31
Reply 5, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 14750 times:



Quoting Racko (Reply 3):
No injuries, German politician Franz Müntefering was on board.

no wonder they make a belly landing.

Does not look too bad, registration is D-AFKE

Let's see how quick they get this off the runway.



Es saugt und blaest der Heinzelmann wo Mutti sonst nur blasen kann. Frueher war mehr Lametta.
User currently offlineTobias2702 From Germany, joined Sep 2008, 731 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 14593 times:



Quoting PanHAM (Reply 5):
no wonder they make a belly landing.

senseless, polemic comment. Please be reminded that this is not the place for political statements.

Was this flight on behalf of LH? I wasn't aware that Contact Air's Fokkers operate out of TXL.



PA, AF, UK, BA, AB, DL, LH, FR, BD, A3, EZY, DY //// A319/320/346, B733/735/73G/738/744/763, AT4, 146, CR2, DH4
User currently offlineGlidepath73 From Germany, joined Mar 2005, 1021 posts, RR: 44
Reply 7, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 14544 times:

According to www.stern.de there was a foam layer laid onto the runway before landing. Maybe some spotter has cought this belly landing on video?


Aviation! That rocks...
User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9746 posts, RR: 31
Reply 8, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 14492 times:



Quoting Tobias2702 (Reply 6):
senseless, polemic comment. Please be reminded that this is not the place for political statements.

calm down. It's not up to you to judge my remarks.

Senseless is the reporting that Mr. M. survived the landing, there were about 87 other people on board who survived it as well and let's all be glad about that. Mr. M. will survive my remark as well, he is an expert at making similar statements.

Flight must have been LH288, they circled for about an hour over STR. Contact Air flies tor LH and LX, I happened to be on a Contact Air F100 last year ZRH-WAW.



Es saugt und blaest der Heinzelmann wo Mutti sonst nur blasen kann. Frueher war mehr Lametta.
User currently offlineLH470 From Germany, joined Jan 2008, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 14484 times:

Quoting Tobias2702 (Reply 6):
Was this flight on behalf of LH? I wasn't aware that Contact Air's Fokkers operate out of TXL

Yes, it was flight LH 288

The F100s of Contact Air are based in STR. They operate for LH to TXL, HAM, BRE (and soon to HAJ). Some F100s are also operated for LX.

Most LH flights from STR to TXL and HAM (and all to BRE) are operated by aircrafts which are based in STR. Therefore, the F100s are now quite common on those routes.

LH 470

[Edited 2009-09-14 03:39:46]


319-321,313,AB6,333,343,346,388,732-738,762/3,772/3,747SP,741-744,DC9,M81/3/8,D10,M11,L10,DH1/3/4,CR1/2/7/9,E70/90,AR8,1
User currently offlineTobias2702 From Germany, joined Sep 2008, 731 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 14484 times:



Quoting Tobias2702 (Reply 6):
Was this flight on behalf of LH?

to answer my own question: seems to be LH 288 / A3 1587. Left TXL at 08:30. According to pax, they circled at STR for a while.



PA, AF, UK, BA, AB, DL, LH, FR, BD, A3, EZY, DY //// A319/320/346, B733/735/73G/738/744/763, AT4, 146, CR2, DH4
User currently offlineEnginebird From United States of America, joined May 2007, 344 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 14483 times:



Quoting Tobias2702 (Reply 6):
Was this flight on behalf of LH?

Yep, LH288. Contact Air's Fokker 100 seem to operate predominantly on behalf of LH and air painted in LH/Star Alliance livery.


User currently offlineLH470 From Germany, joined Jan 2008, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 14457 times:



Quoting Enginebird (Reply 11):
Yep, LH288. Contact Air's Fokker 100 seem to operate predominantly on behalf of LH and air painted in LH/Star Alliance livery

The aircraft involved seems to be D-AFKE, which is the first in LH Regional livery.



319-321,313,AB6,333,343,346,388,732-738,762/3,772/3,747SP,741-744,DC9,M81/3/8,D10,M11,L10,DH1/3/4,CR1/2/7/9,E70/90,AR8,1
User currently offlineEnginebird From United States of America, joined May 2007, 344 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 14406 times:



Quoting LH470 (Reply 12):
The aircraft involved seems to be D-AFKE

Looks like it, check out picture 4 of the pictures found here (thanks to FI for sending me the link):
Stuttgarter Nachrichten


User currently offlineTobias2702 From Germany, joined Sep 2008, 731 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 14372 times:

According to German media, there were 82 pax + 5 crew onboard. 5 pax suffered a traumatic shock, one flight attendant was brought to hospital for checking. Could have been worse, obviously.


PA, AF, UK, BA, AB, DL, LH, FR, BD, A3, EZY, DY //// A319/320/346, B733/735/73G/738/744/763, AT4, 146, CR2, DH4
User currently offlineTobias2702 From Germany, joined Sep 2008, 731 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 14363 times:

there is picture slide:

http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-46568.html



PA, AF, UK, BA, AB, DL, LH, FR, BD, A3, EZY, DY //// A319/320/346, B733/735/73G/738/744/763, AT4, 146, CR2, DH4
User currently offlineLH470 From Germany, joined Jan 2008, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 14295 times:

Some pictures of the actual emergency landing:

http://www.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/st...fering-an-bord-und-unverletzt.html

[Edited 2009-09-14 04:02:40]


319-321,313,AB6,333,343,346,388,732-738,762/3,772/3,747SP,741-744,DC9,M81/3/8,D10,M11,L10,DH1/3/4,CR1/2/7/9,E70/90,AR8,1
User currently offlineKappel From Suriname, joined Jul 2005, 3533 posts, RR: 17
Reply 17, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 14221 times:

Are there any regs that state an aircraft must be able to make a belly landing? It's a true testament to the safety of airliners that the aircraft is able to land on it's belly without any casualties.

Will this be a write-off?



L1011,733,734,73G,738,743,744,752,763,772,77W,DC855,DC863,DC930,DC950,MD11,MD88,306,319,320,321,343,346,ARJ85,CR7,E195
User currently offlineTobias2702 From Germany, joined Sep 2008, 731 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 14189 times:

The plane involved, D-AFKE, entered LH Regional fleet only at the beginning of September this year. It is former PT-MRT (TAM) and B-12296 (Mandarin). Why was it acquired by LH, actually? I thought they are getting Embraers fro their regional fleet.

Here pics of our database:


http://www.airliners.net/photo/Manda...d=7a18634041f8b1533149e9af60c1548a

http://www.airliners.net/photo/TAM/F...d=f7b28dfcfc99334eed553e480ed7475a



PA, AF, UK, BA, AB, DL, LH, FR, BD, A3, EZY, DY //// A319/320/346, B733/735/73G/738/744/763, AT4, 146, CR2, DH4
User currently offlineLH470 From Germany, joined Jan 2008, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 14110 times:



Quoting Tobias2702 (Reply 18):
Why was it acquired by LH, actually? I thought they are getting Embraers fro their regional fleet.

No, the F100s are not beeing acquired by LH but by Contact Air. However, I don't know why C3 chose to get F100s instead of E-Jets since IQ also gets brand new Embraers...

But I guess, C3 usually gets used aircraft. They also took the (used) ATRs from EW, when EW became an all jet fleet.



319-321,313,AB6,333,343,346,388,732-738,762/3,772/3,747SP,741-744,DC9,M81/3/8,D10,M11,L10,DH1/3/4,CR1/2/7/9,E70/90,AR8,1
User currently offlineSomeone83 From Norway, joined Sep 2006, 3513 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 14099 times:



Quoting Tobias2702 (Reply 18):
Why was it acquired by LH, actually?

LH does not own Contact Air


User currently offlineZeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 9231 posts, RR: 76
Reply 21, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 14065 times:



Quoting LH470 (Reply 12):
The aircraft involved seems to be D-AFKE, which is the first in LH Regional livery.

Would they call a photoshop picture of this aircraft DE-FAKE ?  Smile



We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
User currently offlineHiflyer From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2177 posts, RR: 3
Reply 22, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 13875 times:

I am curious why the aircraft was allowed to land at STR....fuel was not an issue nor was time as it is reported as circling for an hour and the runway was foamed. Why would this potential incident be allowed to land at a basically one runway airport probably closing the field to future operations indefinitely? (FRA and MUC are close by just for starters and with far larger amounts of emergency rescue vehicles due to the larger airport size in case something went wrong. ) Luckily everything went well....aside from the airport being closed....

User currently onlineBlueShamu330s From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 3063 posts, RR: 23
Reply 23, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 13546 times:



Quoting N14AZ (Reply 4):
A picture of the F 100 can be seen here: http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/2009/09....html

Am I the only one who clicked on the page, gave the pic a passing glance, and for a second mistook the page arrows for huge winglets?!



So I drive a 4x4. So what?! Tax the a$$ off me for it...oh, you already have... :-(
User currently offlinePVGAMS From China, joined Apr 2009, 55 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 13465 times:



Quoting BlueShamu330s (Reply 23):
Am I the only one who clicked on the page, gave the pic a passing glance, and for a second mistook the page arrows for huge winglets?!

no you are not  Smile


25 Burkhard : 14 years old. Other F100 out there available. Only had three weeks with Contact Air. I assume it will go as spare parts.
26 PanHAM : yes, but easy to spot, an F10 would be too heavy for such a registration. The damage at FRA/MUC in terms of diverted flights would have been greater
27 KL911 : Wow, just oneday after I asked here how many F100's were still in service. Grrrr. Hope they can repair it.
28 Tobias2702 : An airport is not there for the airport's sake, but for the people living there. This has to be outbalanced, because a second rw would drastically in
29 PanHAM : excuse me, but an airport is there for the people and has to have the proper infrastructure so it can serve the people in its catchment area properly
30 BERFlyer : During the time they circled the Aircraft did several "close by" flying manouvers to the tower were some technicans were trying to find out whats wron
31 MUCFLYER : finally the decision where to go rests with the pilot. Yes, STR airport is well equiped for any aircraft rescue and recovery actions. STR airport wit
32 Post contains links MUCFLYER : here are two pics: http://www.flugzeugbilder.de/show.php?id=873510 http://www.flugzeugbilder.de/show.php?id=873511
33 Burkhard : Definitvely a proper belly landing... Congrats to the pilot, well done.
34 Post contains links MUCFLYER : here is a video of the landing: http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/2009/09...-wurde-auf-video-festgehalten.html
35 SandroZRH : Der Flugkapitän hat die FAHRgäste gewarnt. hmmm
36 Post contains links NEMA : BBC News shows a video of the landing here... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8255851.stm
37 Thomas_Jaeger : If ACARS reports are right, then this was only the 12th scheduled leg of D-AFKE with Contact Air: 11SEP09 STR-BRE BRE-STR STR-BCN BCN-STR STR-TXL TXL-
38 SandroZRH : maybe better not to tell them, just imagine if Bild gets that info
39 Viscount724 : I believe Contact Air F100s currently operate LX flights ZRH-WAW and ZRH-VCE, 3 daily roundtrips on each route. Not sure if they do anything else for
40 SandroZRH : ZRH-BUD afaik.
41 Post contains links MATURRO727 : more info: http://www.avherald.com/h?article=41fbf5b9&opt=0 regards. MATURRO727
42 Viscount724 : Helvetic Airways F100s operates LX flights ZRH-BUD, also ZRH-PRG.
43 SandroZRH : aah yeh. Too many F100 operators around here
44 A340Spotter : Also ZRH-BRU on the mid-afternoon flight, at least they were 1-2 weeks ago. JSD
45 Kiwiandrew : that landing certainly put the "contact" into contactair
46 NicoEDDF : Whoooo...didn't know its already political incorrectness to talk about politicians in a democrazy. Who far have we come to dare to talk about our rep
47 Tobias2702 : Just my opinion, may I bring a quote forum description for the Non-Aviation forum: " This is the only forum where political comments are allowed. " A
48 JU068 : @Tobias27207 I seriously think you need to drop it, there is no point, he might have been dumb or rude to mention it but you are being the same now by
49 Burkhard : I found this a nice, harmless, funny joke, and I'm sure that Mr. Müntefering who has some sense of humor would have considered this the same and lau
50 JU068 : I was always wondering, how they remove the plane like that? Do they take it up with some sort of a crane and then on some truck, or how?
51 MHG : Atleast they fly ZRH-STR at weekends ! Just booked last sunday STR-ZRH-BHX-ZRH-STR with SWISS for oct 17/18 and all segments are Fokker 100 !!! (STR-
52 Godbless : The nightstop is always flown with C3 100's (STA STR: 2330; STD STR: 0550). This flight is used to shuttle the crews to ZRH as they are STR-based.
53 Slimshady : Getting back on track from the political discussion.... Doesnt the F100 have emergency blow down or a hand crank or some alternate means to get the ge
54 TurkishWings : The guys who filmed it are speaking Turkish
55 SXI899 : The aircraft is scheduled to be flown to Fokker Services in Woensdrecht (EHWO) tomorrow for repairs. From what I've heard, it should be flying again i
56 Aviopic : Nope, it would not have helped in this case anyway. I was just about to post this. Damage isn't to bad and repair not to much of a problem.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
PHL Clsd Due To Emergency Landing On 27L posted Sun Nov 16 2008 06:49:26 by Gift4tbone
DUR Airport Closed Due To A/c Incident posted Wed Jun 18 2008 03:44:40 by A390
Lhasa Airport Closed Due To Unrest? posted Fri Mar 14 2008 12:49:23 by BuyantUkhaa
Dates Kuwait Airport Closed due to Iraq War? posted Sat Jun 2 2007 22:24:06 by LaPaige
East Timor Airport Closed Due To Violence posted Wed Oct 25 2006 12:47:05 by BuyantUkhaa
BOM Airport Closed Due To Weather posted Tue Jul 26 2005 19:58:25 by SR 103
Luton Airport Closed Due To Terror/Security Alert? posted Tue Jul 19 2005 19:51:16 by Gilesdavies
Airport Closed Due To Weather Conditions posted Mon Feb 21 2005 15:19:58 by Hardiwv
GVA Airport Closed Due To Snow Fall posted Sun Jan 23 2005 14:33:51 by Runway23
ANC Airport Closed Due To Winds... posted Thu Mar 13 2003 11:28:16 by Rydawg82