Kevinasaurus From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 37 posts, RR: 0 Posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 5433 times:
Not sure if this is of any interest to anyone else (I've had too much time on my hands lately!), but I think it's interesting that YYZ Toronto Pearson no longer has a Terminal 2 - but kept Terminals 1 and 3. Are there any other airports that have this kind of thing?
Krsw757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 114 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 5399 times:
RSW has concourse's B,C,D. The reasoning behind it, is due to expansion if needed. The original plans call for concourse's A and E to be added on the sides of the current building if traffic demands need it. Could explain why they haven't renamed the terminals at YYZ, just a guess though.
BOStonsox From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 2007 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 5261 times:
BOS has A, B, C, and E. D became part of C and E was supposed to become D, however so far nothing has come of it. B is divided into North and South, or "AA side" and "US side", which makes me wonder if in the future that will become a new terminal. Interestingly enough, BOS doesn't have any concourses.
Aeroflot777 From Russia, joined Mar 2004, 3066 posts, RR: 24
Reply 11, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 5239 times:
Moscow's Sheremetyevo is opening it's doors to the brand new Terminal D next month, simultaneously switching the airport sequence from numbers to letters. When the shift occurs, SVO will have a Terminal C, D, E, and F. But the construction on A, B, and G hasn't even been fully planned, although potential projects exist.
Goldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 6148 posts, RR: 14
Reply 23, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 4682 times:
Quoting San747 (Reply 1): ONT only has terminals 2 and 4, but they're numbered that way because the space in between those terminals can theoretically be used to construct terminals 1 and 3, should the need ever occur.
Terminal 1 still exists; it's the old main terminal. It can still theoretically be used until it's torn down (which, as I understand, is soon. ) The old DL terminal used to be terminal 2.
I don't see them putting a new T1 just west of T2 right away for a few reasons:
1) The international terminal, employee parking lot, and mail house are in the way.
2) The fuel farm, and its underground holding tanks are there.
Terminal 3 can fit between 2 and 4. The spots are already numbered and ready to go. I used to tow planes onto 308 all of the time.
Terminal 5 can be built right away on the empty lot just east of T4.
Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.