Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Such A Large Difference In Coach/business  
User currently offline413x3 From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 1983 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1869 times:

Flight during the week for a random week day. LAX to ORD

Coach - $200 RT
Business - $1300
First - same as business...

Why so high for business and first, but rock bottom for coach? I would pay for a business class ticket if it was 500-600. Do they really fill the seats with business/first travelers? Maybe if prices were less they could not upgrade people for free and might come out with more profit?

Just a wild guess I'm not very familiar with ticket pricing schemes.

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJU068 From Serbia, joined Aug 2009, 2579 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (4 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1836 times:

Isn't business class filled by companies who don't really care that much about the prices and don't mind paying a bit more?

User currently offline413x3 From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 1983 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (4 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1836 times:

Yes but are there really enough of them on every flight to warrant such a large fair? the same cost as first class on that particular flight

User currently offlineJU068 From Serbia, joined Aug 2009, 2579 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (4 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1824 times:

Yes but the flights are between two rather large cities, so I suppose there are.
They wouldn't have them if they couldn't fill the empty seats  Smile


User currently offline413x3 From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 1983 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (4 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1813 times:

Well they do seem to have a good number of empty seats, that's why people often get upgraded for free. Why not make the prices a little cheaper and get someone like me to pay instead of giving up a free upgrade

User currently offlineJU068 From Serbia, joined Aug 2009, 2579 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (4 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1786 times:

Well then that just shows how competent the management is  Smile

User currently offlinePEET7G From Hungary, joined Jan 2007, 695 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1705 times:



Quoting JU068 (Reply 1):
Isn't business class filled by companies who don't really care that much about the prices and don't mind paying a bit more?

Well, not really in these days  Sad
Taking our example we do outsourced business processes everything from IT support to financial management, for really big businesses... In the old days "pre-restrictions" traveling for our level was pretty much the highest you could get, for lower ranks eco was target and business for anything longer than 5 hours.
Now we do the same amount of traveling simply on the lowest available fare basis. It means no way in hell to get business on intra-European flights, or whenever flying anywhere short haul. Also ECO cabin for everyone on long haul flights, only getting Business when traveling on a "work on next day" basis (meaning, you arrive in the early morning and required to work upon arrival, so the sleep you get is on the plane  Smile )... First is only when the airline bumps us up there  Smile

The reason why the airlines will not "de-value" their premium product is a simple lesson in any "eco-book"
If you "de-value" your product and your customers will get used to it! It will be almost impossible to raise the prices back up, once the economy recovers.
I guess (and hope they are right) that the airlines believe once the world economy will be back to normal, the companies will start spending on their premium product once again.
"de-valueing" or dumping your premium product could be a good solution for immediate cash-flow stimulation, but it might be an own-goal in the long run...

besides, taking your own numbers, if they dump the business and First seats out on your given rate, It would mean the same amount of cash generated in a full cabin as with an approximately 40% filled cabin, with more stress on the crew, etc... so why go through the hassle and why not fly empty seats for the same amount of cash generated and let some passengers feel privileged by upgrading them to the empty seats?



Peet7G
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What's The Difference Between UA And TED In Coach? posted Fri Dec 5 2003 03:08:35 by Richard28
The Difference In ATR's posted Wed Apr 8 2009 21:45:24 by BrickyardPHL
Can An A380 Seat 3-5-3 In Coach posted Sun Nov 30 2008 20:18:44 by 747400sp
Thomas Cook 767 - 8 Across In Coach?! posted Wed Sep 17 2008 10:35:38 by SSTsomeday
Difference In Flight Times, PER-SIN And SIN-PER posted Tue Jan 8 2008 07:34:04 by Windowplease
AF 744 To Vietnam & PTVs In Coach posted Sun Oct 21 2007 10:09:54 by A350-200
Large Planes In SAN And Profitability posted Thu Oct 11 2007 18:39:41 by DL767captain
Delta Advertising; What A Difference In 2 Years posted Mon Sep 3 2007 21:17:00 by SLCUT2777
Fidelity Sells Large Stake In US Airways posted Thu Jul 12 2007 02:31:19 by TUNisia
AA 763 PTV's In Coach posted Tue Nov 28 2006 22:41:59 by Tommy767