Stickers From South Africa, joined Sep 2007, 105 posts, RR: 0 Posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3448 times:
There was a thread earlier in which Leahy said he could be shot if they did not learn from A380 and 787 mistakes and get the A350 to customers on schedule. (My quick summary)
What i want to know, is ...were there not these types of delays before on other aircraft series? Did all the Airbus variants eg. the A320 30 40 etc. all have a perfect and on time first flight and EIS?
Did the 727 737 747 757 767 777 with all their varients have perfectly smooth paths into service?
I suspect they didn't, and while i understand that the A380, and 787 are far more sophisticated and break new ground, each new line did the same in its day. Each new series was a huge improvememnt in technology and flight systems.
What have A & B learnt from past delays and mistakes, or if it was on time, what did they do right? Have they repeated the past, good or bad and is there any hope that A350 will have an on time EIS and Mr Leahy won't have to face the firing squad?
Trystero From Portugal, joined Oct 2008, 251 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3317 times:
I think there's a conflict between management and engineering. the first worried about stock markets the later with security. Deadlines are important in any sort of business, but in many cases you stumble on them and usually things turn out worse, if there's no flexibility...